New developments in immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Evolution of Immunosuppressive Agents in Renal Transplantation: An Updated Review
Suppression of allograft rejection is the central issue in renal transplantation (RT). Thus, development of immunosuppressive agents is the key for successful allograft function. Immunosuppression agents in RT have evolved over the last six decades beginning with total lymphoid irradiation to the currently available immunosuppressive strategies, which have significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes and improved short-term graft and patient outcomes. However their use is associated with long-term graft dysfunction, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, infections and malignancies. Chronic antibody-mediated rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction still remain the major problems, often leading to graft loss and shortened long-term graft survival.
Targets of new immunosuppressants in renal transplantation
Kidney International Supplements, 2011
Although current immunosuppression is highly effective in avoiding acute rejection, it is associated with nephrotoxicity, cardiovascular morbidity, infection, and cancer. Thus, new drugs dealing with new mechanisms, as well as minimizing comorbidities, are warranted in renal transplantation. Few novel drugs are currently under investigation in Phase I, II, or III clinical trials. Belatacept is a humanized antibody that inhibits T-cell co-stimulation and has shown encouraging results in Phase II and III trials. Moreover, two new small molecules are under clinical development: AEB071 or sotrastaurin (a protein kinase C inhibitor) and CP-690550 or tasocitinib (a Janus kinase inhibitor). Refinement in selecting the best combinations for the new and current immunosuppressive agents is probably the main challenge for the next few years.
Immunosuppressive Drugs in Renal Transplantation
Drugs, 1992
Currently, expected IO-year first graft survival rates for kidneys from HLA-identical sibling, I-haplotype-matched relative, and cadaver donors are 74, 51, and 40%, respectively. Histocompatibility, immunological conditioning with blood products, and immunosuppression with glucocorticoids, azathioprine, cyclosporin, and the antithymocyte (antilymphocyte) antibody preparations have been significant factors in the gradual improvement of kidney graft survival rates. Nearly all immunosuppression regimens are cyclosporin-based, Antithymocyte antibody induction therapy with delayed administration of cyclosporin is widely practised to avoid cyclosporin nephrotoxicity while the kidney graft is recovering from preservation injury. Late cyclosporin withdrawal results in inferior cadaver kidney transplant survival rates. Rejection crises usually respond to high dose glucocorticoid therapy. Glucocorticoid-resistant rejection usually responds to treatment with antithymocyte antibody. FK-506 is a promising new immunosuppressant that has properties similar to cyclosporin. Prophylaxis against viral, bacterial and fungal infections is necessary to reduce the morbidity of immunosuppression. The incidence of malignant conditions associated with viral infections is significantly increased with immunosuppression.
Immunosuppressive Minimization Strategies in Kidney Transplantation
Organ Donation and Transplantation - Current Status and Future Challenges, 2018
The long-term graft survival in renal transplantation results is still controversial, the toxicity and adverse reactions of the immunosuppressive drugs are implicated, as well as cellular and humoral antigen-specific immune mechanisms; therefore, different strategies for adapting immunosuppression are used to reduce the complications associated with the use of these drugs. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) require an adequate dose-dependent concentration leading to the appearance of drug-related adverse reactions. The variability in the required dose of CNI leads to minimization strategies that do not result in a higher acute rejection (AR) incidence when compared to other immunosuppressive agents. Early steroid withdrawal is another strategy, although with an increase in AR, but without an impact on the function and survival of the renal graft. The reduction of mycophenolate mofetil to 1.5 g/day seems to be a therapeutic option, decreasing the infectious, hematological and gastrointestinal adverse reactions. Finally, alemtuzumab, bortezomib, belatacept and cellular therapies are in the search for the new treatments, whose premise is the induction of donor-specific nonresponse in the context of operational tolerance or mixed chimerism. The use of adapted and adequate immunosuppression has led to variable results and some are very encouraging; however, they must be validated with experimental studies.
A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF FK506BASED IMMUNOSUPPRESSION AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1
Transplantation, 1995
A group of 204 adult patients was entered into a prospective, randomized trial comparing FK506/ prednisone with FK506/azathioprine/prednisone after renal transplantation between August 1, 1991 and October 11, 1992. The purpose of the study was to see if the addition of azathioprine would reduce the incidence of rejection and improve graft survival. The recipient population was unselected, with 61 (30%) patients undergoing retransplantation, 37 (18%) having a panel-reactive antibody greater than 40%, and 33 (16%) over 60 years of age. The mean recipient age was 43.8 ± 13.7 years (range 17.6-78). The mean donor age was 34.0 ± 20.1 years (range 0.3-75); 13% of the cadaveric kidneys were from pediatric donors less than 3 years of age and were transplanted en bloc. The mean cold ischemia time was 31.4 ± 8.4 hr. Living donors were the source of 13% of the kidneys. The mean follow-up was 22 ± 4 months (range 12-29). Overall one-year actual patient survival was 94%. Overall one-year actual graft survival was 87%. Patients starting on double therapy had a one-year actual patient survival of 96% and a one-year actual graft survival of 92%. Patients starting on triple therapy had a one-year actual patient survival of 91% (P = ns compared with double therapy), and a one-year actual graft survival of 82% (P < 0.02, compared with double therapy). Overall results with first cadaver transplants included a one-year actual patient survival of 94% and one-year actual graft survival of 88%, with no differences between double and triple therapy. The overall incidence of rejection was 48%, with 54% in the double therapy group and 41% in the triple therapy group (P < . 07). The incidence of steroid-resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy (OKT3 or ATGAM) was 13%, and was not different between the double and triple therapy groups. The mean serum creatinine was 1.8 ± 0.8 mg/dl. The mean BUN was 33 ± 21 mg/dl, with no significant difference between the therapy groups. The mean serum cholesterol was 192 ± 49 mg/dl. A total of 56% of the patients are off prednisone, and 35% of the patients are not taking any antihypertensive medications. Other complications included cytomegalovirus-14%; new-onset diabetes-16% (half of which was reversible); and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder-1%. There was a high incidence of crossover between the two groups, 27% of the patients in the double therapy group requiring the addition of azathioprine, and 45% of the patients in the triple therapy group requiring its discontinuation (usually temporary). These results show that FK506 is an excellent immunosuppressive agent after renal transplantation and that azathioprine is not routinely effective 1
Minimizing calcineurin inhibitor drugs in renal transplantation
Transplantation Proceedings, 2003
Calcineurin inhibitor drugs (CNI), primarily cyclosporine then tacrolimus, have been the centerpieces of maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplantation since their introduction in the 1980s. While these drugs have been responsible for improved short-term outcomes and diminished rates of acute rejection, they are nephrotoxic and can cause permanent renal injury in many patients. Indeed, some have found that at 10 years after transplantation, the benefits of CNI drugs have been lost compared to the previous generation of maintenance immunosuppression. The use of these agents over many years contributes to the antigen-independent decline in renal function referred to as chronic allograft nephropathy. However, it remains unclear to what degree the use of CNI drugs contribute to ultimate graft loss. For these reasons immunosuppressive alternatives to CNI drugs have begun to emerge during the past few years. The recent introduction of the potent immunosuppressive agent sirolimus has afforded an opportunity to develop a regimen designed to maximize prophylaxis of early acute rejection, absent drug-induced nephrotoxicity. It was our feeling that the combination of antibody induction therapy combined with sirolimus substitution in a three-drug maintenance regimen, would provide the best posttransplant renal function and lowest rates of acute rejection. We have developed a CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen consisting of basiliximab induction, followed by sirolimus, MMF and steroids. Using this protocol we demonstrated comparable transplant outcomes with improved renal function in adult recipients of primary renal transplants. Limiting nephrotoxic immunosuppression should be considered an important goal; but requires sufficient long-term follow-up to support the benefits suggested from initial analysis of the data.
Calcineurin Inhibitor–Free Immunosuppression in Renal Transplantation
2005
Purpose. To describe our initial results using a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression protocol in renal transplants. Patients and methods. Between October 2001 and June 2003, 56 recipients of a renal allografts were started on an immunosuppression protocol without calcineurin inhibitors, consisting of basiliximab, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. We analyzed patient and graft survival, acute rejection episodes, and renal function.
Clinical Transplantation, 2006
Background: The application of antibody induction therapy in adult living-related kidney transplantation remains under discussion. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of living-related (LRT) and unrelated renal transplant recipients (LURT) using standardized immunosuppressive protocols. From October 2000 to October 2004, 72 adult LRT (TX) were performed at our institution. Thirty-nine LRT (group A) and 33 LURT (group B) recipients received a standardized immunosuppressive therapy consisting of tacrolimus (Tac), steroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) without antibody induction therapy. This prolective analysis included immediate graft function, rejection rate and loss of the transplanted organ. The incidence of post-operative good graft function (>90%) was similar for both groups, as well as the rejection rate showed 57.8% for patients of group A and 58.8% for patients of group B (p<0.5). However, the number of rejections (>1 rejection) was significantly higher in group B (11.8%) compared to patients in group A (4.4%). No difference concerning loss of transplanted kidney was observed for both groups. Conventional Tac, MMF and steroid-based immunosuppression therapy is equivalent in efficacy of therapy in living-related and unrelated renal transplants. In our opinion, induction therapy in patients without immunologic risk factors has no favourable effect.
[Immunosuppression after renal transplantation]
Nefrología : publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española Nefrologia, 2000
Immunosuppression (IS) is administered to kidney transplant recipients to prevent rejection episodes and loss of the renal allograft. Most centers rely on a triple IS after induction with either interleukin-2 receptor antibodies or antithymocyte globulin. The most frequently used substances for maintenance IS are glucocorticoids, antimetabolites, mTOR inhibitors (mTORi), calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and the costimulation blocker belatacept. Guidelines recommend a triple combination consisting of CNIs, antimetabolites and corticosteroids for the majority of patients. The long-term risk for malignancy in general is increased in solid organ recipients compared to the general population. Modification of IS may result in reduced risk for nonmelanoma skin cancers but results in higher graft rejection rates and in the case of mTORi, deaths. In the case of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) treatment options are reduction of IS, rituximab, chemotherapy, radiation therapy or a combination of these. The optimal protocol has not yet been established and depends on patient age and status, tumor load, laboratory findings, organ functions (heart, kidney, liver) and PTLD subtype. Posttransplantation diabetes mellitus is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation. Tacrolimus more than cyclosporine A, sirolimus and corticosteroids are considered to be diabetogenic; however, tacrolimus remains the first choice as the mainstay of IS. In general, the IS regimen should be tailored for optimal kidney allograft survival rather than better diabetic