Current management of portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Patients with Pre-existent Portal Vein Thrombosis
Journal of Liver, 2017
Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a surgical challenge with technical difficulty. The aim of this study was to analyze the operative planning for management of PVT in LDLT and the impact of PVT on the outcome in comparison to patients without PVT. Methods: Between July 2003 to August 2016, 213 patients underwent LDLT. The patients were divided into two groups with and without PVT. The preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were analysed. Results: Thirty six patients (16.9%) had different grades of PVT at time of liver transplantation (LT); grades I, II, III and IV were 18 (50%), 14 (38.9%), 3 (8.3%) and 1 patient (2.8%) respectively. The management of PVT was by; thrombectomy in 31 patients (86%), bypass graft in 2 patients (5.6%), portal replacement graft in 1 patient (2.8%), anastomosis with the left renal vein in 1 patient (2.8%) and with large collateral vein in 1 patient (2.8%). Overall postoperative PVT occurred in 10 patients (4.7%), 4 patients of them had preoperative PVT. The perioperative mortality in patients with PVT, and patients without PVT was 33.3%, and 20.3%, respectively (P=0.17). The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7y survival in patients with PVT was 49.7%, 46.2%, 46.2%, 46.2% respectively and in patients without PVT it was 65%, 53.7%, 50.8%, 49% respectively (P=0.29). Conclusions: Preoperative PVT may not keep a patient from undergoing successful LT with comparable outcome to patients without PVT specially with partial PVT.
Portal Vein Thrombosis in Adults Undergoing Liver Transplantation
Transplantation, 2000
Background. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has been seen as an obstacle to liver transplantation (LTx). Recent data suggest that favorable results may be achieved in this group of patients but only limited information from small size series is available. The present study was conducted in an effort to review the surgical options in patients with PVT and to assess the impact of PVT on LTx outcome. Risk factors for PVT and the value of screening tools are also analyzed.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2017
To report the final analysis of the safety and efficacy of portal vein (PV) recanalization (PVR) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation (PVR-TIPS) in patients with PV thrombosis (PVT) in need of liver transplantation. Sixty-one patients with cirrhosis and PVT underwent PVR-TIPS to improve transplantation candidacy. Median patient age was 58 years (range, 22-75 y), and median pre-TIPS Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 14 (range, 7-42). The most common etiologies of cirrhosis were nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in 18 patients (30%) and hepatitis C in 13 patients (21%). Twenty-seven patients (44%) had partial PVT, and 34 patients (56%) had complete thrombosis. Forty-nine patients (80%) had Yerdel grade 2 PVT, and 12 (20%) had Yerdel grade 3 PVT. Twenty-nine patients (48%) had cavernous transformation of the PV. PVR-TIPS was technically successful in 60 of 61 patients (98%). PV/TIPS patency was maintained in 55 patients (92%) at a median follow-up ...
Transplantation Proceedings, 2005
Introduction. Although portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is no longer considered a contraindication for liver transplantation (OLT), it is still considered a high risk because of the complexity of the surgical procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PVT in the recipient during OLT on intra-and perioperative management and outcome. Patients and Methods. Between April 1986 and October 2003, 721 primary OLT included 64 patients (8.8%) with PVT. The underlying liver disease was postnecrotic cirrhosis in most cases (n ϭ 37). Intraoperative (length of surgery, packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusion requirements, ischemia time, complications) and postoperative parameters (ICU stay and hospitalization time, complications, actuarial graft and patient survival at 1 month and 1 and 5 years) were compared with a control group of patients submitted to OLT without PVT (n ϭ 657). Results. Portal flow was reestablished in 56 patients with thromboendovenectomy, in seven patients with a venous graft from the superior mesenteric vein, and with cavoportal hemitransposition in one case. The average ICU and hospital stay as well as the 1-month and 1-and 5-year patient survivals were not significantly different in the PVT versus the control group. We observed slightly more PRBC transfusions and longer surgery procedures in the PVT group. Conclusions. Our experience suggests that thromboendovenectomy is the procedure of choice for PVT. The results are good in terms of survival rates and postoperative complications, although the presence of PVT may lead to more technical problems during surgery.
HPB, 2007
Background. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a well recognized complication of patients with end-stage cirrhosis and its incidence ranges from 2 to 26%. The aim of this study was to analyze the results and long-term follow-up of a consecutive series of liver transplants performed in patients with PVT and compare them with patients transplanted without PVT. Patients and methods. Between July 1995 and June 2006, 26 liver transplants were performed in patients with PVT (8.7%). Risk factors and variables associated with the transplant and the post-transplant period were analyzed. A comparative analysis with 273 patients transplanted without PVT was performed. Results. The patients comprised 53.8% males, average age 40, 7 years. PVT was detected during surgery in 65%. Indications for transplantation were: post-necrotic cirrhosis 73%, cholestatic liver diseases 23%, and congenital liver fibrosis 4%. Child-Pugh C: 61.5%. Techniques were trombectomy in 21 patients with PVT grades I, II, IV, and extra-anatomical mesenteric graft in 5 with grade III. Morbidity was 57.7%, recurrence of PVT was 7.7%, and in-hospital mortality was 26.9%. Greater operative time, transfusion requirements, and re-operations were found in PVT patients. One-year survival was 59.6%: 75.2% for grade 1 and 44.8% for grades 2, 3, and 4. Discussion. The study demonstrated a PVT prevalence of 8.7%, a higher incidence of partial thrombosis (grade 1), and successful management of PVT grade 4 with thrombectomy. Liver transplant in PVT patients was associated with an increased operative time, transfusion requirements, re-interventions, and lower survival rate according to PVT extension.
The role of TIPS for portal vein patency in liver transplant patients with portal vein thrombosis
Liver Transplantation, 2006
The purpose of this research was to study the efficacy and outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic shunt (TIPS) in end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) eligible for orthotopic liver transplant. Nine consecutive patients with PVT underwent TIPS as a nonemergent elective outpatient procedure. The primary indication for TIPS was to maintain portal vein patency for optimal surgical outcome. Eight patients underwent contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) and 1 magnetic resonance imaging diagnosing PVT. Shunt creation was determined by available targets at the time of TIPS and by prior imaging. Patients were followed with portography, ultrasound, CT, or magnetic resonance imaging, and the luminal occlusion was estimated before and after TIPS. Primary endpoints were transplantation, removal from the transplant list, or death. Stabilization, improvement, or complete resolution of thrombosis was considered successful therapy. Failures included propagation of thrombosis or vessel occlusion, and poor surgical anatomy due to PVT. Of 9 patients with PVT, TIPS was successfully placed in all patients without complication or TIPS-related mortality. Eight of 9 patients (88.8%) had improvement at follow-up. One patient failed therapy and re-thrombosed. Two patients (22.2%) were transplanted without complication and had no PVT at the time of transplant. Eight of 9 patients were listed for transplant at the time of their TIPS. Eight of 9 PVTs were nonocclusive. Four of 9 patients (44%) had evidence of cavernous transformation. Two patients expired during follow-up 42 and 44 months after TIPS. Three patients remain on the transplant list. One patient has not been listed due to nonprogression of disease. One patient has been removed from the transplant list because of comorbid disease. In conclusion, TIPS is safe and effective in patients with PVT and ESLD requiring transplant. Patients can be successfully transplanted with optimal surgical anatomy. Liver Transpl 12: 1544-1551, 2006.