The Interpretation of Graphical Information in Word Processing (original) (raw)
Related papers
Towards a systematic understanding of graphical cues in communication through statistical graphs
Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 2014
Statistical graphs-in particular, line graphs and bar graphs-are efficient means of communication in a wide range of non-expert settings. In communication settings, statistical graphs do not only serve as visualizations of individual data points but also provide visual access to various aspects of the information contained in data. Moreover, specific types of graphs are better means for providing visual access to certain aspects of data. For instance, trend information is visually conveyed through line graphs and bar graphs in the time domain. The interpretation of the information content in a graph is influenced by several factors, such as perceptual salience of line segments in a line graph. In addition, the presence of graphical cues substantially influences the interpretation of graph readers. Graphical cues are visual elements, usually in the form of point markers, non-directional lines, curves and arrows. They play a communicative role in communication through graphs. The present study reports an experimental investigation, in which the participants provided verbal descriptions of a set of graphs with/without graphical cues. The stimuli involved line graphs and bar graphs that represented the same data. The analyses of eye movements and verbal protocols reveal that the interpretations of the participants are systematically influenced by the presence or absence of a graphical cue, the type of the graphical cue (i.e., a point marker vs. an arrow), as well as the type of the graph (i.e., a line graph vs. a bar graph).
Processing Information in Graphical Form
The puipose of this exploratory, descriptive study was to examine how children process different tasks of comprehension presented in graphical form. During the Spring 1981, 8 fourth graders and 9 seventh graders-were interviewed. The children were presented with graphs accompanied by six questions reflecting thiee levels of comprehension: "reading the data," "reading between the data," and *reading beyond the data." The children approached the tasks of comprehension by_employing text --/schema ;based processing strategies, text-based processing strategies, and sOhema-..based processing strategies. These three types, of strategies led to both correct and incorrect responses. Most students were' aware of the need for, and also used, a text-based strategy for "'reading the data" directly from the graph. Host, seventh-grade and higher achieving fourth-grade students demonStrated the text/schema integration strategy successfully on problems. Seventh graders seemed to know when to rely on schema-based strategies, even when not required by the example, _----idurmam fourth graders failed to note4process, and/or adjust for inconsistent information an a bar-graph.designed with numbers decreasing from bottom to top on the vertical axis.
Process and representation in graphical displays
1993
To survive and succeed in the world, people have to comprehend both diverse natural sources of information, such as landscapes, weather conditions, and animal sounds, and human-created information artifacts such as pictorial representations(ie, graphics) and text. Researchers have developed theories and models that describe how people comprehend text (for example, see [8]), but have largely ignored graphics.
An Examination of Cleveland and McGill's Hierarchy of Graphical Elements
2010
Two experiments were conducted to examine Cleveland and McGills’ theory of graph perception. In Experiment 1 participants made judgments about the individual perceptual elements. In Experiment 2, participants were presented with graphs that isolated specific perceptual elements. Although the original hierarchy included ten elements, the current research suggested that, depending on the task, there may be no more than three or four individual rankings. This research presents the first attempt at a comprehensive examination of the relationship between the perception of isolated graph elements and how these elements affect graph reading.
Cognitive Science, 1997
We discuss external and internal graphical and linguistic representational systems. We argue that a cognitive theory of peoples' reasoning performance must account for (a) the logical equivalence of inferences expressed in graphical and linguistic form and (b) the implementational di erences that a ect facility of inference. Our theory proposes that graphical representations limit abstraction and thereby aid processibility. W e discuss the ideas of speci city and abstraction, and their cognitive relevance. Empirical support comes from tasks (i) involving and (ii) not involving the manipulation of external graphics. For (i), we t a k e Euler's Circles, provide a novel computational reconstruction, show h o w i t captures abstractions, and contrast it with earlier construals, and with Mental Models' representations. We demonstrate equivalence of the graphical Euler system, and the nongraphical Mental Models system. For (ii), we discuss text comprehension, and the mental performance of syllogisms. By positing an internal system with the same speci city a s Euler's Circles we c o ver the Mental Models data, and generate new empirical predictions. Finally, w e consider how the architecture of working memory explains why s u c h speci c representations are relatively easy to store.
Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication
Memory & Cognition, 1999
Interpretations of graphic displays of information seem to be rooted in principles of cognitive naturalness and information processing rather than arbitrary correspondences. Both of these considerations predict that people should more readily associate bars with discrete information because bars are discrete entities and facilitate point estimates. Similarly, people should more readily associate lines with trends because lines connect discrete entities and directly represent slope. In two experiments, viewers tended to describe bar graphs in terms of discrete comparisons between individual data points, while they tended to describe line graphs in terms of continuous trends. In a third experiment, participants sketched graphic displays to illustrate verbal descriptions of data; they tended to use bar graphs to convey discrete comparisons, and line graphs to convey trends. The strength of the bar/line convention seems to depend on the communicative situation as well as the perceptual and conceptual properties of the graphic displays.
Effects of Graphs on Text Comprehension
2000
Abstract Sources of information, from textbooks to multimedia encyclopedias combine text and graphics. This paper applies the construction-integration model of text comprehension to the processing of text and quantitative graphs. The model suggests that, when reading a graph that has information that is redundant with the text, a reader may directly connect the propositional information from the graph and the text due to overlap.