Ethiopia's Criminal Law Evolution from the Perspectives of Major Legal Theories: An Overview (original) (raw)
Related papers
Legal Theory in Interpretation of the Ethiopian Criminal Law
Mizan Law Review, 2020
The criminal law is adopted as a means of achieving the common good; it is interpreted and applied by the court. The judge chooses the type of legal theory and method to employ in the interpretation and application of the criminal law. Such theories may be acquired from higher norms or from the decision of the Supreme Court. Because such choice of theory and method determines the outcome of the case, the judge is also expected to be guided by the doctrines in criminal law inspired by the values of rule of law and respect for fundamental rights, enshrined in the Constitution. This article examines how courts harmonise the application of the positive criminal law with the non-positivist theories of higher norms. After reviewing various criminal rules and their judicial application, it finds that the court applies the criminal law as it is written in disregard of the non-positivist theories of higher norms, at times in contradiction to the basic doctrines of the criminal law itself.
Bahir Dar University Journal of Law , 2024
While a constitution vests (limited) power on a government, criminal law may be used to effectively deny power to any contending party (group). This article argues that besides achieving its legitimate ends of prevention of crime, the criminal law is used to govern the country by denying power to contending parties. This is done based on the analysis of the adoption of the respective constitutions, the adoption of the criminal laws and the attending sociopolitical circumstances of the adoption of the criminal law.Emperor Haile Selassie adopted the 1930 Penal Code on the day of his coronation which is later sanctioned by the 1931 Constitution which makes his power perpetual "divine right". When the Provisional Military Government had come to power, it adopted a Special Penal Code to be applied by a Special Courts-Martial, and the PDRE Constitution came only 13 years later. Likewise, as soon as EPRDF came to power, it detained the previous regime officials, both civilian and military, in the first few days. It is only after such action that the Transitional Period Charter was drawn up.
The Centre of Governance and Human Rights (CGHR), launched in late 2009, draws together experts, practitioners and policymakers from the University of Cambridge and far beyond to think critically and innovatively about pressing governance and human rights issues throughout the world, with a special focus on Africa. The Centre aims to be a world-class interdisciplinary hub for fresh thinking, collaborative research and improving practice.
Rule By Law in Ethiopia: Rendering Constitutional Limits on Government Power Nonsensical *
2012
Rule of law is one of the most controversial yet universally appealing contemporary legal political concepts, a buzzword for a range of actors - political leaders, international organisations and academics. Jumping on the bandwagon, the Ethiopian Constitution aims to build 'a political community founded on the rule of law' and conditions the success of this laudable goal on the full respect of individual and people's fundamental freedoms and rights. Scholars have distinguished between formal and substantive, "thin" and "thick" conceptions of the rule of law. This paper will assess the constitutional basis and understanding of the rule of law and limits on government power in Ethiopia. It discusses the manifestation of rule by law or the law of rules (much in line with the thin or formal conceptions of rule of law) in practice particularly since the most contested 2005 Ethiopian elections. The article also identifies the different factors that breed an...
Law and Development in Ethiopia
The paper discerns the role and failure of law as a development tool of a nation. Even if the paper particularly address in the Ethiopian context, it could as well apply for any developing nations in Africa or Latin America or Asia.
An Introduction to Ethiopian Legal Culture
Springer eBooks, 2023
Ethiopia is a diverse country, with a predominantly agrarian and religious population. It enjoys a long but equally contested history. Its traditional legal system revolved around issues of ascension to power, land use, and rituals of a good life. Modern Ethiopia, marked by the attainment of centralized administration, only began at the turn of the 20th century, and the codification of its laws during the 1950s and 1960s has been a major milestone in this period. In recognition of its diversity and hoping to stem recurring political conflicts, federalism was introduced as a state structure in 1991. Accordingly, state power is divided between the federal and regional governments. The federal government is parliamentarian and has a bicameral parliament, with the upper house uniquely tasked with settling constitutional disputes. Religious and traditional dispute-resolution mechanisms are also given constitutional recognition. While the legal system principally features the civil law legal tradition, it has recently introduced a partial precedent system. Weak democratic institutions, undeveloped legal education, and a nascent legal profession render discussions on distinct legal methods in Ethiopia difficult. Despite these limitations and by focusing on federal laws and institutions, this chapter presents the salient features of the Ethiopian legal culture, following the Legal Cultural Model developed by Professor Jørn Øyrehagen Sunde.
Legisprudential Evaluation of Ethiopian Criminal Law-Making
Mizan Law Review, 2020
The state adopts criminal rules and punishment in order to achieve various state ends. There is very little agreement regarding the content of 'good criminal law'. However, there is a general agreement regarding 'good' criminal lawmaking process. This article argues that the lawmaking process may be used to evaluate the legitimacy of the criminalisation process. Thus, it discusses pre-legislation, legislation and post-legislation phase duties of the legislature and finds that these processes were not complied with in various Ethiopian laws that contain penal provisions.
Criminalisation is the most intrusive state action; as such, it requires strong justification. Looking merely at the doctrinal justifications, in the common-law system, harm is the single most important justification for criminalisation. In the continental system, however, there are positive and negative requirements to be complied with. The positive requirement is that the law is intended to protect ‘legal good’. Such legal good covers interests that are essential for the social existence of the individual. The negative requirement is ultima ratio. Further, when the criminal law is used, the means-end proportionality is required to be maintained. The criminal law is one body of law. Thus, the General Part of the criminal law is applicable to offences stated both in the Special Part of the Criminal Code and those stated in special penal legislation or penal provisions contained in administrative regulatory legislation. The notion of legal good is incorporated into Art 1 of the Criminal Code in broader context as ‘common good’. However, the law maker adopted several pieces of penal legislation and extensive penal provisions contained in administrative regulatory legislation contrary to such ‘legislative promise’. In those penal provisions, the law maker criminalises conducts that were already criminalised in the Criminal Code, save they increase the punishment. The legislator criminalises conducts contrary to the principles of criminalisation, including the principles in the General Part of the Criminal Code, such as, the principle of legality and the principle of lenity. The legislator is consistent in choosing increased penal sentence both in absolute and relative standards. It is this excessive use of criminal law and excessive punishment that is presented as over-criminalisation.