Guiding the (MDG and SDG) goals; Empowering Local Actors (original) (raw)
Related papers
At the Millennium Summit in 2000, all Member States of the United Nations reaffirmed their commitment to sustainable development and eliminating poverty by the adoption of the Millennium Declaration that is internationally accepted as a common global development framework. The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), consists of eight goals, 18 targets and 48 indicators, of which three goals are related to health, two to development, one each to education, empowerment and the environment. They frame the achievement of developmental goals in a time-bond inter-related, inter-dependant and complementary/mutually reinforcing manner. It seeks to mobilise developmental efforts involving national governments and development partners and thus, provide an opportunity for achieving the commitments made at UN Summits in 1980s and 1990s. The MDGs, therefore, provide an excellent example of “global governance” which can be defined as a set of “collective efforts to identify, understand or address wo...
International Journal of Engineering and Techniques, 2019
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) differ from the MDGs in purpose, concept, and politics. This article focuses process and comparison of the predecessor to the SDGs. The identification of Millennium Development Goals and the follow-on Sustainable Development Goals are referred to here as examples of such policy forming activities. The Millennium Declaration was adopted on 8th September 2000. According to David Hulme, the drafting process attempted to please both the rich countries insisting on their Development Assistance Committee (DAC) prepared list of International Development Goals and everybody else. It argues that the SDGs address several of the key shortcomings of the MDGs and incorporate a broader and more transformative agenda that more adequately reflect the complex challenges of the 21st century and the need for structural reforms in the global economy. The SDGs also reverse the MDG approach to global goal setting and the misplaced belief in the virtues of simplicity, concreteness, and quantification. While the SDGs promise the potential for a more transformative agenda, implementation will depend on continued advocacy on each of the targets to hold authorities to account. The future of global public participation may move beyond invitation (and its deficiencies), to one based on collecting passive information of the global public. It still remains to be seen whether SDGs really demonstrate the longterm public concerns especially with the set of global priorities until 2030.
THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS: Evaluating Their Transition Into The SDGs
The MDGs are now in the spotlight since we have reached the year 2015, the target year for achieving these goals. There has been much debate and discussion about these goals since their conception. Hence one half of the discourse focuses on the past, how these goals have improved outcomes in various countries and the world in general while the other half is talking about the path ahead and how to ensure that the momentum gained by the goals is maintained. The result of such discussions have now culminated in the formation of the Sustainable Development Goals. It has been a long, interesting journey since 2000 for the world on the development front because never before have all the countries risen together to tackle development ailments together at this level and intensity. Hence with this background, this paper attempts to talk about the MDGs and provide some constructive criticism of their conception and design. I will also talk about a few cases from India and hence set the stage for improvements in the MDGs that the SDGs are trying to fulfill.
The Sustainable Development Goals
Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks, 2023
The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) (2000-2015) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (2015-30) illustrate that we are one global human family. We are interconnected. Issues of poverty, ill health and natural disasters have an impact directly or indirectly on all the people and nations of the world. Today, the SDGs represent the global development agenda. Governments have the primary responsibility for implementing the SDGs, and ensuring follow-up and review over the coming 8 years, at the national, regional and global levels. However, according to SDG 17, which concerns partnerships, there is also a place for all stakeholders (government, business, academia, civil society and local community) to play a role. This entry, after a brief summary of the global development agenda, explains the relationship between SDGs and the social and solidarity economy (SSE) principles and models to illustrate the compatibility of the two, and showcases the SSE as a community-based strategy for the effective localising of the SDGs.
Lancet, 2010
The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) represent an unprecedented global consensus about measures to reduce poverty. The eight goals address targets to increase incomes; reduce hunger; achieve universal primary education; eliminate gender inequality; reduce maternal and child mortality; reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; reverse the loss of natural resources and biodiversity; improve access to water, sanitation, and good housing; and establish eff ective global partnerships. Progress in some goals has been impressive; however, global targets will not be met in some regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia. As we approach the 2015 target date, there is considerable interest in assessment of the present goals and in consideration of the future of development goals after 2015.