Ambiguous Encounters: Revisiting Foucault and Goffman at an Activation Programme for Asylum-seekers (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Production of Precarity in Denmark’s Asylum Regime
Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 2020
The special issue discusses the intersections between social welfare and migration control, as well as how stratified access to welfare services is used to govern ‘unwanted’ groups. This article explores these intersections in Denmark’ deterrence-oriented asylum policy regime, analysing the discourses and practices whereby people seeking protection are constructed as ‘undeserv-ing’ poor. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in different sites of enforcement of Denmark’s asylum regime as well as interviews with street-level workers and people who sought asylum in Denmark, I trace how the Danish deterrence ap-proach operates through the production of poverty and precarity among people seeking protection in asylum reception camps, deportation-oriented integration programmes, and finally, deportation camps. I show how the Danish welfare state, as a result of the merging of external and internal bordering practices, produces a condition of precarity and (non)deportability that extends from the asylum camps to those awarded temporary protection status. Hence, while the deterrence-oriented Danish policy regime has not proven ‘effective’ from the point of view of immigration control, it has served to reinforced a dualised, hierarchically ordered welfare rights’ regime that gradually erodes the rights and life opportunities of unwanted noncitizen ‘others’.
Migration Studies, 2017
Drawing on elite interviews with UK asylum policymakers, this article entails a detailed elaboration of how policy programmes are produced by particular ways of imagining asylum seeking in an effort to reduce the complexity of the phenomenon and thus devise policy responses to it. The article explores how such processes can lead to the curtailment of the economic rights of asylum seekers with specific reference the UK policy of severely restricting labour market access for asylum seekers. The policy imaginary-the story which is utilized in reducing the complexity of irregular migration in this context-is the idea of the 'economic pull factor'. That is that disingenuous asylum seekers (economic migrants in disguise) are 'pulled' to particular countries by economic opportunities. This construal of what drives irregular migration for asylum is not natural or inevitable, it is the outcome of institutionally embedded ways of viewing the world and Britain's place within it. This discussion brings insights from critical policy studies to bear on asylum policy making, offering new ways of understanding the practices and processes of policy making in this field.
Social work towards immigrants integration into the labour market in Denmark
This study aims to explore what is the impact of discourses and power relation in social work practice towards immigrants’ integration into the labour market in Denmark, what types of discourses exist and what is the impact of those discourses in social work practice in this field. Also, it aims to identify what kind of challenges do social workers face when they work with immigrants’ integration into labour market as a result of power relations generated by discourses. Therefore, in-depth interviews were conducted with social workers working in Aalborg Jobcentre-Integration; IntergationsNet and Kofoeds Skole nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) operating in Aarhus and Copenhagen. The empirical data was analysed using Foucault’s discourse-analytic approach. According to the research, integration laws and programmes have control and impact on immigrants’ behaviours and lives. Furthermore, through discourses and technologies of governmentality, the state also impact on social work practice, which sometimes creates challenges for social workers at a service provisional level. This research might enhance social work practice through awareness raising toward power relations exercised at the different levels and discourses around immigrants’ integration. Moreover, ensuring more space, power and self-governance for both social workers and immigrants in policy designing and decision making processes may also advance social work practice towards immigrants’ integration into the labour market, as opposed to social workers being solely responsible for implementation or immigrants being passive recipients of integration programmes, respectively. This may balance Integration Act’s requirements, social work values and ethics, also immigrants’ needs, therefore, ensuring the efficiency of social work practice with immigrants. Keywords: international social work, governmentality, discourse, power, immigration, integration, labour market
2022
This paper discusses the regulation of the Ausbildungsduldung implemented in Germany in 2016 to integrate rejected asylum-seekers through vocational training into the labour market. I here intertwine the literature of neoliberal welfare state with the theories of border studies to understand the intersectionality of race and class in the lives of refugees put to work. Drawn on ethnographic fieldwork from 2016 to 2020 with refugees and practitioners, I shed light on a moral economy of deservingness underpinning the Ausbildungsduldung and affecting its implementation as well as the process of construction of the self negotiated by refugees during the vocational training. The analysis of the discursive, formal, and subjective dimensions of the Ausbildungsduldung shows how the control feature prevails over the integration aim. This pushes refugees into a legal, social-economic, and existential precarity that is institutionally produced. To be integrated, refugees have to prove their worthiness by embodying the ideal migrant: a good worker with a "Beruf " (profession) in the low-paid sectors of the German economy. Ultimately, this paper addresses the concept of "Neoliberal Asylum" to discuss how the Western states use the category of "deservingness" as moral criteria to guide the juridical measures to govern refugees through their economies.
The constructed illegitimacy of most asylum migration leaves NGOs working on refugee and asylum issues caught between the implementation of government programmes and the advocacy of asylum seekers and refugees on the basis of compassion. The article examines the consequences of these tensions for a resistant politics of asylum migration. Employing Foucault's bio-political concept of the recipricocity of security and freedom of mobility, it situates pro-asylum resistance within the political context of neo-liberal, communitarian, and liberal-authoritarianism that developed within the New Labour regime of managed migration. Whilst elaborating a Foucauldian methodology, I suggest that Foucault's concept of the immanence of the conflict of politics to government provides a weaker basis for social justice than Gramsci's notion of anti/hegemonic politics. Arguably, the NGO strategy of working within the prevailing power structures has legitimised the criminalisation of asylum immigration. Foucault's biopolitics of mobility The control of borders, circulation and networks have been seen as central to the management of relationships between sovereignty, people and territory in the post-Cold War environment. Foucault (1991, 102-3) described the liberal government of these relationships as the work of biopolitics, which seeks to optimise the well-being of the national population. Foucault's concept of government is broader than statist accounts of power: government comprises calculated and rational activity, undertaken by a multiplicity of authorities and agencies, employing a variety of techniques and forms of knowledge, that seek to shape our conduct by working through our desires, aspirations, interests and beliefs, for definite but shifting ends (Dean, 1999: 209). The rationale of a government of mobility is the optimal arrangement of the relations between circulations and stasis and the well-being of the population (Foucault, 2004a: 20-2). This governmentality is also concerned with the relations amongst the different categories of circulation. Although I focus on migration, migration is just one form of mobility amongst others including trade, finance, politics, information and culture. The liberal government of mobility does not just work on behalf of and through the consent of the disciplined population of citizen-subjects (Dean, 199: 122) but also extends modes of government to other populations. The extension of a visa regime, for example, works to govern the circulation of a foreign population. Short of a paradigm of open borders, the government of mobility requires measures of exclusion grounded in coercion and/or force. Liberal government takes form on a continuum ranging from facilitative