Comparative Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 OpenVPN Protocol Performance Based on QoS Parameters (original) (raw)
Related papers
Performance analysis of tunnel broker through open virtual private network
TELKOMNIKA Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control, 2019
Tunnel Broker uses automatic configuration tunneling mechanism for IPv6 clients connected to IPv4 internet. Connectivity between clients and service providers in IPv6 is urgently needed. Open VPN as a provider implemented configures it by a VPN network, so IPv6 and IPv4 public IP clients can easily connect to the server. In this research focused on the performance of tunnel broker mechanism by utilizing open VPN as access to the network. IPv6 tunnel broker is developed by installing Open VPN and providing IPv6 IPs. Implementation of public IP usage in observing the performance of tunnel broker development is done in BCN Telkom Laboratory Network. The measurement results show that TCP and UDP throughput of IPv6 is slightly higher than IPv4. The research using OpenVPN as a server Tunnel Broker for client access to the server is still rarely done, especially in the field of the network based on Internet Protocol.
Applications based on IPv4 and IPv6 Networks
2015
Abstract—With the expansion of Internet, the current protocol address space (IPv4) is faced with a shortage and the new generation Internet (IPv6) is raised in order to solve this problem. Also with increasing interest of users in real-time and multimedia applications, the Internet and how to implement these applications to improve the quality of service (QoS) has become a significant challenge. In this paper, a network with both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols is simulated by using OPNET Modeler and implementation of QoS is tested on it. Packet loss, end-to-end delay and jitter were evaluated as network performance metrics. The results showed that satisfying the needs of multimedia applications on IPv6 are slightly weaker than IPv4, but the benefits have evolved more and more and the difference is negligible. Also according to the methods used in terms of this study, the combination of DiffServ and MPLS QoS implementation is the best option for both Internet Protocol versions.
A Comparative Review Of Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4) and Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6
Many computers and devices are becoming more connected to the internet in recent years; the use of the Internet Protocol (IP) has made the connectivity and identification of these devices possible in large scale. In this paper, we will discuss the evolution of Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4), its features, issues and limitations and how Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) tends to solve some of these issues including the differences and transition between these two protocols.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN IPv4 AND IPv6
International Journal of Information Systems and Engineering, 2015
The internet protocol (IP) has become the driving force over the decade for which devices and organizations that tend to rely on as a means of communication between hosts or nodes. As such it becomes a necessity to have a reliable protocol that will be adaptive to change. This review work will be comparing and analyzing the two versions of internet protocol, IPv4 and IPv6 in term of address space, feature, functionality and transition mechanism which resolve the issue of incompatibility. Also aim of the work is to provide a detailed discussion about the reasons for migration from IPv4 and IPv6 and also outline the various differences that exist between the two protocols in term of their performance.
Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) is the latest version of the Internet Protocol (IP). IPv6 is intended to replace IPv4, which is still widely used, in order to deal with the problem of IPv4 address exhaustion. In addition to evaluating the performance of IPv6, it is important to consider the interoperability between IPv4 and IPv6 networks, in addition to the migration process from IPv4 to IPv6. One way for IPv4 users to access IPv6 users/hosts is by encapsulating IPv6 packets within IPv4, in effect using IPv4 as a link layer for IPv6. This is known as tunnelling. The aim of this paper is to compare and evaluate the performance of IPv4, IPv6 and tunnelling (6to4) using OPNET 17.5. A computer simulation shows the theoretical comparison in terms of delay, throughput and packet loss.
Comparison and Transition Study of Internet Protocol Version 4 & 6 (IPV4 &IPV6)
International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 2017
With the evolution of internet over the years the transition from ipv4to ipv6 has become a great necessity. Due to the shortage of ipv4 address space provided by the IANA (internet assigned numbers authority) we are left with no choice but to go for ipv6 transition process. By default, ipv4 and ipv6 network cannot communicate with each other, so we have to provide the facility of communication between them. This facility can be provided by various transition mechanisms which includes dual stack mechanism, tunnelling and NAT protocol translation. This paper demonstrates comparison study between ipv4 and ipv6 and the transition from ipv4 to ipv6.
Comparitive Study on IPV4 and IPV6 Internet Protocol
As we know daily many devices are manufactured which need an IP address to get connected to internet. IPv6 is known as next generation IP which is currently being used at few places and still more research are going on in this region, this paper contains the comparison between the two IP address schemes namely IPv4 and IPv6. The header formats and performance parameters of the both scheme are discussed. Also th e benefits of IPv6 over IPv4 is discussed in brief .
Analysis of Packet Transmission Overhead of IPv4 and IPv6 through Simulation
2014
Internet Protocol (IP) is becoming a dominant network layer protocol in the current network. Due to some limitations, mainly the shortage of address space in IP version 4 (IPv4), the newer version of the protocol named IPv6 is increasingly getting its popularity. But there is already a huge investment made towards the implementation of IPv4. Also, new applications have started developing using IPv6. So, there is a great confusion among users of IP based network whether to deploy IPv6 or stay back with IPv4. This paper is a general comparative study of both the versions of IP and intended to outline few scenarios that may be considered during the selection of IP version as a network layer protocol. The findings of this work are presented in the form of graphs which focus few positive sides of using IPv4. The advantages of IPv6 over IPv4 are tabulated to realize the benefits of using IPv6 as well. The conclusion drawn from the work carried out may be considered as a basis for the prop...