Profile of Patients with Maxillofacial Fracture in Emergency Department, Head-Neck Surgery Division, Dr. Soetomo Public Hospital Surabaya in 2020 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Profile of Maxillofacial Fracture Patients at General Hospital in Surabaya
Biomolecular and Health Science Journal, 2021
Introduction: Maxillofacial fractures can be caused by blunt trauma or sharp trauma. The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics in patients with maxillofacial fractures who were treated in the Head and Neck Surgery Division of Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya during 2016.Methods: The research design was cross-sectional from patients with maxillofacial fractures. Those variables were evaluated are gender, age, type of etiology, site of maxillofacial fracture, gender and type of etiology based incidence, age and type of etiology based incidence. Data presented descriptively.Results: From 68 patients, consisted of 57 (83.82%) male, average age of 30.1 years old. The most common type of etiology was traffic accidents (92.64%), most common site of fractures were mandibular (33.33%), gender associated with the type of etiology was men who experienced traffic accidents (79.41%), and the age associated with the most types of events was ages 26-45 years with...
Demographic distribution of maxillofacial fractures in ayub teaching hospital: 7-year review
J Ayub Med Coll …, 2009
Background: This retrospective study was carried out to determine the demographic distribution of Maxillofacial Fractures (MFF) in patients reported to Maxillofacial Surgical Unit, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad from 2001 to 2007. Methods: All the patients having a history of maxillofacial fractures were included according to age, gender distribution and risk factors. Isolated Nasal fractures, Naso-Orbito-Ethmiodal complex fractures and earthquake victims were excluded from this study. Results: This study encompassed a total numbers of 952 patients. Males were 645 (67.8%) and females were 307 (32.2%) with male to female ratio 2.1:1. Most of the fractures occurred during third decade of life. The most common risk factor was Road Traffic Accident (RTA) n= 70 (38.9%). Most of the fractures were occurred during the month of June, July and August. Conclusion: RTA is still the most common risk factor of maxillofacial fractures and is more common in male.
2021
J Babol Univ Med Sci; 23; 2021; PP: 126-134 Received: Jun 7 2020, Revised: Sep 1 2020, Accepted: Nov 11 2020. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Head and neck trauma and related injuries account for a high rate of mortality and neurological defects. Since maxillofacial trauma occurs alone or in combination with other severe injuries, this study was performed to determine the frequency of maxillofacial fractures in patients with head and neck trauma referred to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Babol. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed among all patients with maxillofacial trauma who referred to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Center of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Babol in 2018-2019. Necessary information was collected via history, clinical examinations, facial radiographs and hospital records. CT scan was performed in patients with decreased level of consciousness, neurological symptoms or clinical signs of skull fracture. Data about age, gender, cause of injury, pattern...
Changing pattern of maxillofacial fractures in a sub-urban nigerian teaching hospital
The Nigerian postgraduate medical journal, 2009
To ascertain the current pattern of facial fractures presenting in the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital (OAUTH) and compare this with two earlier reports from the same institution. All patients presenting with facial bone fractures at the OAUTH between January 1996 and December 2004 were included in the study. Information obtained were patients' demographics, date, cause, site and type of injury. The interval before presentation in the hospital was documented. Data was analysed and compared with two earlier studies carried out in the same institution. 451 patients (351 males and 100 females) presented with 632 facial bone fractures between January 1996 and December 2004. This shows a greater female involvement compared with earlier studies. Similar to earlier studies, majority of the patients (39.7%) were aged 21-30 years however, more cases occurred in the first decade of life in the present study than in the previous. Road traffic crashes remained the leading cause...
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF 57 MAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA CASES
DR. P. R. YADAV, 2019
The epidemiology of maxillofacial trauma varies in geographic zones and different countries. Population, lifestyle (culture, social, and economic status), and concentration can affect the control of maxillofacial trauma. So, in this study, the epidemiological data and treatment plan concerning maxillofacial trauma were evaluated and analyzed. This study isa retrospective study which performed on 57 patients who suffer from maxillofacial trauma and suspected facial bone fractures. All patients were presented to the emergency department in three different hospitals and specialist dental center in Karbala city from the period of January 2017 till January 2018. Epidemiological data sheet (checklist) and medical records were depended to achieve the study aims. Based on t-test, statistical analysis was done. Based on accidents causes,the ratio of Road Traffic Accidents (RTA) n=38 (66.67%), Assault n=9 (15.79%), Falls n=7(12.28%), War Injury n=1(1.75%), and other injury n=2 (3.51%) of the samples. In other classify that depend on the anatomical sites, the mandible was the most common fractured bone in RTA, Assaults, and falls. The previous studies and this study that discussed the epidemiology of maxillofacial traumas show various etiologic factors, demographic properties, causes of injuries and fracture patterns probably due to social, cultural and the policy of governmental especially in roads and traffic rules.
Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science, 2021
Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to reveal the pattern of maxillofacial fractures in a tertiary hospital of Bangladesh. Materials and Methods: A sum of 329 cases with maxillofacial trauma was treated in the inpatient department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Dhaka Dental College Hospital from January 2016 to December 2018. The outcome variables included age, gender, etiology, and anatomic site of fractures. Results: The age range was 4-82 years with peak frequency occurring in the age group 21-30 years. The mean age was 28.08 ± 14.77 (Mean ± SD) years. The male to female ratio was 4.98: 1. We observed that, 80.85% cases encountered from road traffic accidents (RTAs) followed by assault (8.51%). The mandible (61.7%) was predominantly affected bone followed by zygomatic complex (9.71%), midface (9.42%). The body (35.78%) was the commonest site of mandibular fracture followed by the parasymphysis (23.32%), angle (17.57%), and condyle (14.07%). The least affected site was the ramus (0.4%) and the coronoid (0.64%) process. In midface fractures, the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) was the most susceptible area (25.40% of midface) followed by maxilla (24.60%). In a nutshell, the incidence of mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures was predominant among maxillofacial fractures. Conclusion: Young men were predominantly affected in maxillofacial trauma, as they were involved in outside activities mostly. Road traffic rules should be strictly implemented. Awareness of safety guidelines should be executed by campaigning. In a nutshell, the incidence of mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures was predominant among all the maxillofacial fractures.
Etiology, Pattern, Treatment and Outcome of Maxillofacial Fractures at Dhulikhel Hospital
Kathmandu University Medical Journal
Background Maxillo-Facial region is one of the prominent parts of human body and is more vulnerable to injury when any form of trauma is encountered. Injury to this region can result in fractures and pattern of fractures often depends upon the mechanism of injury as well as direction of impact. Objective To determine the etiology, pattern, treatment, and outcome of maxillofacial fractures presenting to Dhulikhel hospital. Method The records of all the patients with maxillofacial injuries presenting to the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery of dhulikhel hospital between period of December 2012 to November 2019 were included in the study. The data regarding age, sex and etiology were recorded. The etiologies were classified as Motor vehicle accidents (MVA), interpersonal violence, fall injuries, sports related injuries, occupational hazards, gunshot injuries and animal attacks and others. Similarly, the pattern of fractures was recorded according to classification by anatomi...
Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science , 2021
Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to reveal the pattern of maxillofacial fractures in a tertiary hospital of Bangladesh. Materials and Methods: A sum of 329 cases with maxillofacial trauma was treated in the inpatient department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Dhaka Dental College Hospital from January 2016 to December 2018. The outcome variables included age, gender, etiology, and anatomic site of fractures. Results: The age range was 4-82 years with peak frequency occurring in the age group 21-30 years. The mean age was 28.08 ± 14.77 (Mean ± SD) years. The male to female ratio was 4.98: 1. We observed that, 80.85% cases encountered from road traffic accidents (RTAs) followed by assault (8.51%). The mandible (61.7%) was predominantly affected bone followed by zygomatic complex (9.71%), midface (9.42%). The body (35.78%) was the commonest site of mandibular fracture followed by the parasymphysis (23.32%), angle (17.57%), and condyle (14.07%). The least affected site was the ramus (0.4%) and the coronoid (0.64%) process. In midface fractures, the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) was the most susceptible area (25.40% of midface) followed by maxilla (24.60%). In a nutshell, the incidence of mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures was predominant among maxillofacial fractures. Conclusion: Young men were predominantly affected in maxillofacial trauma, as they were involved in outside activities mostly. Road traffic rules should be strictly implemented. Awareness of safety guidelines should be executed by campaigning. In a nutshell, the incidence of mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures was predominant among all the maxillofacial fractures.
Study of the Pattern of Maxillofacial Fractures Seen at a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2013
Aim The present study was planned to investigate the etiology of maxillofacial injuries and to analyze the pattern of maxillofacial factures as well as the various factors influencing their distribution. Study design A one year cross-sectional study was done and 1,108 patients with maxillofacial fractures were analyzed consecutively from April 2010 to March 2011 who reported to the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the Centre for Dental Education & Research and Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi. A performa was designed to collect the data that included age and sex distribution, etiology, influence of alcohol, type of fractures, use of restraints devices, associated injuries and treatment delivered. Results Out of 1,108 patients, 89.62 % were males with a male:female ratio of 8.63:1. The 21-30 year age group was found to be maximum (39.98 %). Road traffic accidents accounted for 49.01 %, followed by assault (22.38 %) and fall from height (21.66 %). Two wheelers were the most commonly involved vehicle. Out of 437 road traffic accident patients (excluding pedestrian, n = 106), only 52.40 % were found to be using restraints devices at the time of accident. Totally 25.45 % patients were under the influence of alcohol at the time of injury. According to anatomical distribution of fractures, mandibular fractures (33.57 %) were most prevalent, followed by maxilla (31.13 %), nasal (28.33 %) and zygoma (24.36 %). Head injuries (18.32 %) were found to be the most common associated injuries followed by lower limb fractures. Conclusion The motive behind executing this article is to analyze the various trends of facial fractures and all those factors that affect their distribution. A perfect understanding of pattern of maxillofacial fracture will assist the executors of health care in the treatment planning and management of facial injuries. Knowledge gained from the present study would influence in assessing the effectiveness of existing preventive measures and elaboration of future preventive measures and conducting new research.
IOSR Journals , 2019
BACKGROUND: Mortality and injuries from road traffic accidents is a major public health problem in India and it is predicted to increase in the future. Various studies have been published in the literature about maxillofacial injuries from different parts of the world, but demographic data is difficult to analyze and interpret. The aim of this study was to analyze and tabulate the patterns of injuries to the maxillofacial region and the treatment provided in the region of Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. METHODS: The study employed a retrospective case record analysis. Medical case records of those patients who had met with road traffic accidents andundergone treatment for maxillo-facial trauma in the Department of Dental Surgery, Government Medical College, Coimbatore were analyzed retrospectively from January 2018 till December 2018. RESULTS: Among the 209 patient records, it was observed that the age groups between 21-30 years experienced the majority of the maxilla-facialtrauma. Under the injury type mandibular fractures (58.8%) were the most common whereas unilateral maxillary fracture was the least common (0.2%). Inter-maxillary fixation (71.2%) was the most common method used to treat the fractures. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study has thrown light on the various trends of maxillofacial trauma occurring in the Coimbatore region. Common strategies needs to be evolved to reduce the number of road traffic accidents.