Importance of Diagnosis and Treatment of Anterior Root Tear of the Lateral Meniscus from a Biomechanical Perspective (original) (raw)
Related papers
Biomechanical consequences of anterior root detachment of the lateral meniscus and its reinsertion
Scientific Reports
Treatment of posterior meniscal roots tears evolved after biomechanical evidence of increased pressures on the tibiofemoral cartilage produced by this lesion and the subsequent accelerated development of arthritis or osteonecrosis observed clinically. However, little is known about the consequences of the detachment of the anterior roots. This in-vitro study analyzes the biomechanical changes in the tibiofemoral joint caused by avulsion of the anterior root of the lateral meniscus. The effectiveness of surgical root re-insertion to restore the pre-injured conditions is also evaluated. Using cadaveric knees at flexion angles from 0° to 90°, results show that the lesion significantly reduces the contact area and raises the pressure on the tibiofemoral cartilage of the injured compartment at all angles. Said modifications become larger at low flexion angles, which are the most frequent positions adopted by the knee in daily and sports activities, where they result similar to total meni...
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2014
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the meniscofemoral ligament (MFL) in maintaining lateral-compartment contact pressures after injury to the posterior root of the lateral meniscus, and to measure the ability to restore intra-articular loads to normal by repairing the posterior root to the tibia after transection of the posterior root and the MFL. Methods: Ten human cadaveric knee joints were axially loaded to 100 N. A digital pressure sensor measured the contact pressure in the lateral compartment. Five different conditions were tested: intact, after release of the posterior root of the lateral meniscus, after transection of the MFL along with release of the posterior root, refixation of the posterior root of the lateral meniscus to the tibia using an anatomic transosseous tunnel, and refixation of the root of the lateral meniscus using a tibial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnel. Results: After transection of the posterior lateral meniscus root, the contact pressure did not increase significantly. The additional transection of the MFL led to a significant increase in the contact pressure. Anatomic fixation of the meniscus posterior horn reduced the femorotibial pressure to nearly pre-sectioning values. The reattachment of the meniscus posterior horn through a tibial ACL tunnel was equivalent to an anatomic fixation. Conclusions: In the case of a root tear of the lateral meniscus, the MFL maintains meniscus function and stabilizes the pressure in the lateral compartment. A complete detachment of the posterior meniscus horn (MFL and root tear) leads to an increase in the intra-articular pressure. A root repair normalizes the pressure down to normal values. The tibial ACL tunnel is suitable to perform the repair and to lead out the suture. Clinical Relevance: In the case of a complete detachment of the meniscus posterior horn, fixation of the posterior root is necessary to restore the meniscus function and to guarantee an equal pressure distribution in the lateral compartment. It can be combined with an ACL reconstruction. T he knee joint menisci increase femorotibial congruency, and they contribute significantly to load transmission and joint stability. During load transmission, the forces acting on the meniscus are transformed into circumferential hoop stress. 1 This circular hoop stress is transmitted to the tibial plateau by the anterior and posterior roots of the menisci. 1 Therefore From the Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2014
An avulsion of the posterior root attachment of the lateral meniscus or a radial tear close to the root attachment can lead to degenerative knee arthritis. Although the biomechanical effects of comparable injuries involving the medial meniscus have been studied, we are aware of no such study involving the lateral meniscus. We hypothesized that in situ pull-out suture repair of lateral meniscus root avulsions and of complete radial tears 3 and 6 mm from the root attachment would increase the contact area and decrease mean and peak tibiofemoral contact pressures, at all knee flexion angles, relative to the corresponding avulsion or tear condition. Eight human cadaveric knees underwent biomechanical testing. Eight lateral meniscus conditions (intact, footprint tear, root avulsion, root avulsion repair, radial tears at 3 and 6 mm from the posterior root, and repairs of the 3 and 6-mm tears) were tested at five different flexion angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°) under a compressive 100...
Meniscal Root Tears: Significance, Diagnosis, and Treatment
The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2014
Meniscal root tears, less common than meniscal body tears and frequently unrecognized, are a subset of meniscal injuries that often result in significant knee joint disorders. The meniscus root attachment aids meniscal function by securing the meniscus in place and allowing for optimal shock-absorbing function in the knee. With root tears, meniscal extrusion often occurs, and the transmission of circumferential hoop stresses is impaired. This alters knee biomechanics and kinematics and significantly increases tibiofemoral contact pressure. In recent years, meniscal root tears, which by definition include direct avulsions off the tibial plateau or radial tears adjacent to the root itself, have attracted attention because of concerns that significant meniscal extrusion dramatically inhibits normal meniscal function, leading to a condition biomechanically similar to a total meniscectomy. Recent literature has highlighted the importance of early diagnosis and treatment; fortunately, these processes have been vastly improved by advances in magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. This article presents a review of the clinically relevant anatomic, biomechanical, and functional descriptions of the meniscus root attachments, as well as current strategies for accurate diagnosis and treatment of common injuries to these meniscus root attachments.
Meniscal Root Tears: Current Concepts Review
2018
Meniscal root tears are defined as radial tears located within 1 cm from the meniscal attachment or a bony root avulsion. This injury is biomechanically comparable to a total meniscectomy, leading to compromised hoop stresses resulting in decreased tibiofemoral contact area and increased contact pressures in the involved compartment. These changes are detrimental to the articular cartilage and ultimately lead to the development of early osteoarthritis. Surgical repair is the treatment of choice in patients without significant osteoarthritis (Outerbridge grades 3 or 4). Root repairs have been reported to improve clinical outcomes, decrease meniscal extrusion and slow the onset of degenerative changes. Here we describe the anatomy, biomechanics, clinical evaluation, treatment methods, outcomes, and post-operative rehabilitation for posterior meniscal root tears.
PloS one, 2018
Transtibial pullout suture (TPS) repair of posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) tears was shown to achieve good clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare biomechanically, a novel technique designed to repair PMMR tears using tendon graft (TG) and conventional TPS repair. Twelve porcine tibiae (n = 6 each) TG group: flexor digitorum profundus tendon was passed through an incision in the root area, created 5 mm postero-medially along the edge of the attachment area. TPS group: a modified Mason-Allen suture was created using no. 2 FiberWire. The tendon grafts and sutures were threaded through the bone tunnel and then fixed to the anterolateral cortex of the tibia. The two groups underwent cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test. Displacements of the constructs after 100, 500, and 1000 loading cycles, and the maximum load, stiffness, and elongation at failure were recorded. The TG technique had significantly lower elongation and higher stiffness compared wit...
International Orthopaedics
Purpose To compare biomechanical behaviour of the anterior root of the lateral meniscus (ARLM) after a transtibial repair (TTR) and after an in situ repair (ISR), discussing the reasons for the efficacy of the more advantageous technique. Methods Eight cadaveric human knees were tested at flexion angles from 0° to 90° in four conditions of their ARLM: intact, detached, reinserted using TTR, and reinserted using ISR. Specimens were subjected to 1000 N of compression, and the contact area (CA), mean pressure (MP), and peak pressure (PP) on the tibial cartilage were computed. For the TTR, traction force on the sutures was registered. Results ARLM detachment significantly altered contact biomechanics, mainly at shallow flexion. After ISR, differences compared to the healthy group persisted (extension, CA 22% smaller (p = 0.012); at 30°, CA 30% smaller (p = 0.012), MP 21%, and PP 32% higher (both p = 0.017); at 60°, CA 28% smaller (p = 0.012), MP 32%, and PP 49% higher (both p = 0.025). ...
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2017
The biomechanical effects of lateral meniscal posterior root tears with and without meniscofemoral ligament (MFL) tears in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees have not been studied in detail. To determine the biomechanical effects of the lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root tear in ACL-intact and ACL-deficient knees. In addition, the biomechanical effects of disrupting the MFLs in ACL-deficient knees with meniscal root tears were evaluated. Controlled laboratory study. Ten paired cadaveric knees were mounted in a 6-degrees-of-freedom robot for testing and divided into 2 groups. The sectioning order for group 1 was (1) ACL, (2) LM posterior root, and (3) MFLs, and the order for group 2 was (1) LM posterior root, (2) ACL, and (3) MFLs. For each cutting state, displacements and rotations of the tibia were measured and compared with the intact state after a simulated pivot-shift test (5-N·m internal rotation torque combined with a 10-N·m valgus torque) at 0°, 20°, 30°, 60°,...
Effect of Posterior Horn Medial Meniscus Root Tear on In Vivo Knee Kinematics
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2014
Background: Medial meniscus root tear (MMRT) is a recently recognized yet frequently missed meniscal tear pattern that biomechanically creates an environment approaching meniscal deficiency. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of MMRT on tibiofemoral kinematics and arthrokinematics during daily activities by comparing the injured knees of subjects with isolated MMRT to their uninjured contralateral knees. The hypothesis was that the injured knee will demonstrate significantly more lateral tibial translation and adduction than the uninjured knee, and that the medial compartment will exhibit significantly different arthrokinematics than the lateral compartment in the affected limb. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Seven subjects with isolated MMRT were recruited and volumetric, density-based 3-dimensional models of their distal femurs and proximal tibia were created from computed tomography scans. High-speed, biplan...
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of lateral meniscal posterior root avulsions combined with intact meniscofemoral ligaments (MFLs), deficient MFLs, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and reconstructions, and root repairs using an established tibiofemoral contact mechanics testing protocol. Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested with six knee conditions (1: intact; 2: lateral meniscal posterior root avulsion; 3: root avulsion and deficient MFLs; 4: condition 3 with ACL tear; 5: condition 4 with ACL reconstruction; 6: ACL reconstruction with root repair) at five flexion angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°), under a 1000-N axial load. Contact area and pressure were measured with Tekscan sensors. Compared to the intact state, condition 2 did not significantly change lateral compartment contact area or pressure. Changes in contact mechanics were greater at increased flexion angles; for condition 3 at 0° and 90°, contact area decreased 37 and 52 % [95 % CI ...