On Prosecuting Syrians for War Crimes (original) (raw)
Related papers
The International Military Tribunal, which took place in Nuremberg, Germany, following World War II, was a significant event in the history of international law. Its primary aim was to prosecute high-ranking Nazi officials for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. However, the tribunal was heavily criticized at the time and in the years since its conclusion. One major criticism was that the tribunal applied international law retroactively, holding the defendants accountable for crimes that were not illegal at the time they were committed. Another criticism was that the tribunal was biased in favor of the Allied powers and did not include representatives from the Axis powers. Some also criticized the tribunal for focusing solely on the actions of the defeated Axis powers while ignoring similar actions by the Allied powers. Moreover, some critics argued that the tribunal failed to uphold basic principles of fairness, such as the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial. The tribunal was also accused of being driven by revenge rather than justice, leading some to label it a show trial. Nevertheless, the International Military Tribunal established critical legal precedents and served as the foundation for future international criminal tribunals. Its legacy remains a subject of debate, with some seeing it as a crucial step in holding leaders accountable for international crimes, while others view it as a flawed and politically motivated exercise in retribution. This essay will evaluate the criticisms of the International Military Tribunals on the prosecution of war crimes after World War II, weigh it against its achievements and the ways in which both have advanced the field of international law, lastly it will explore how the perpetrators of war crimes were brought to justice.
Criminology, 2002
Turk's conflict theory of political criminality is used to account for the virtual cessation of international criminal law enforcement following the Nuremberg Tribunal and its revival through the establishment of The Hague Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Turk's theory further helps to contextualize the little known contribution of Sheldon Glueck to the development of the Nuremberg Trials. Glueck helped overcome Soviet wishes to turn Nuremberg into a show trial and developed the organizational plan for the visual and witness evidence of the Holocaust that led to the most important convictions for crimes against humanity in the Nuremberg Trials. The contributions of Glueck and Turk provide an underappreciated foundation for the crirninological study of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Reflections on the Prosecution of War Crimes by International Tribunals
American Journal of International Law, 2006
Just over sixty years ago, the international community, seeking to heal the wounds of a brutal war, embarked on a bold legal experiment. For the first time in history, legal mechanisms were invoked to bring to justice the perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity in international tribunals specifically established for that purpose. The trials at Nuremberg and Tokyo were extraordinary and risky; and, above all, unique in their time.
THE TWO MOST FAMOUS TRIALS: NUREMBERG AND TOKYO
NUREMBERG AND TOKYO, 2023
THE NUREMBERG TRIAL - The author analyses the trials held by the Allies against representatives of the defeated Nazi Germany, for plotting and carrying out invasions of other nations. The author resumes and analyzes the trial opened in Nuremberg on November 14, 1945, against the main political and military leaders of the Third Reich. The Tokyo Trial - The author analyses the trial of the twenty-eight senior Japanese officers before the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, known as the “Tokyo Trial,” which was the second attempt after Nuremberg at an international response to the crimes committed during World War II. The book highlights the procedural weaknesses and political negotiations in the work of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East.
War Criminals and the Jurisdiction of the Nuremberg IMT
STRASAM - Strategical Research Center's digital publication, 2023
In our previous article on the "Evolution of International Criminal Tribunals", we mentioned that the Nazi regime that ruled Germany during the Second World War committed crimes of genocide and violations of humanitarian law. In this article, we will discuss the jurisdiction of the International Military Tribunal established in Nuremberg to try the Nazi authorities after the War. ... The documents are in the archives of the countries that established the court and some documents are not available on the internet. In order to make an evaluation by considering the conditions, possibilities and limitations of the period as a whole, it can be said that national archives, especially in the USA, should be examined by experts on the subject. However, in the light of the available data, there is no doubt that this court is a great step towards the realisation of the ideal of universal human rights. STRASAM link : bit.ly/3rFWxh2
Law, War and Crime. A History of International Criminal Law and War Crimes Trials
This course examines the history of international criminal law and war crimes trials. Beginning in the mid-nineteenth century, we analyze the first attempts to establish international rules that sought to regulate the conduct of warfare and limit its effect for humanitarian reasons. The aftermath of the First World War led to the establishment of the League of Nations, an institution whose aim it was to curb aggressive war. But it was in response to the extreme violence of the Second World War that international law underwent a revolution: the August 1945 London Charter, signed by the four main Allies, defined certain acts as crimes, divided these into three categories (crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity) and determined that individuals who had committed one or more of these acts could now be held criminally responsible under international and not just under domestic law. In the course, we will analyze the 1945-46 International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg and the 1946-48 International Military Tribunal for the Far East at Tokyo, but we will also discuss the politics of justice and retribution more generally, which included tens of thousands of hybrid (that is, a mix of international and domestic) war crimes trials that took place in post-World War II Europe and Asia. The course also examines two more recent international war crimes tribunals: the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and discusses the establishment of the International Criminal Court. It concludes with an examination of several crucial questions that lie at the heart of any attempt to seek justice, but perhaps even more so in international criminal law and war crimes trials: can justice be found for grave crimes such as genocide? What alternative ways exist outside criminal courts? Is there such a thing as neutrality or objectivity in war crimes trials? And what kind of history is written at trials?