Learning-in-Relation: Implementing and Analyzing Assets Based Pedagogies in a Higher Education Classroom (original) (raw)

Abstract

This article discusses the assets-based pedagogical theories used in one higher education classroom while analyzing the ways the co-authors, instructor, and students' learning process and identities were impacted by such pedagogies, lessons, and structures. We examine the ways members of the classroom community were impacted and impacting one another as a result of trialogic interactions-with one another, with multiple scholars whose pieces were read and discussed, and with/in themselves. We then offer pedagogical implications while discussing main themes that emerged from reflective discussions: grappling, citationality, and incompleteness. We frame this work as a community of learners who came to understand their own incomplete and in process growth as learners. This article details a case study for the ways projects in humanization, culturally sustaining pedagogies, and storying can be operationalized in classroom spaces to center moments of tension, grappling, and awakening. "We should see ourselves as stewards not of specific pieces of knowledge but rather of the productive and generative spaces that allow for finding knowledge."-Leigh Patel (2015, p. 79) Pedagogical practices and theories have remained largely unexplored in higher education (Bozalek, Ng'ambi, Wood, Herrington, Hardman & Amory 2014). 1 Educational research should focus on the equitable pedagogical practices instructors use in higher education classrooms that center the experiences, lived realities, tribal and cultural knowledges, and histories that students bring with them (Tachine, Cabrera & Yellow Bird 2017). Although not always the case, much of the teaching practices that occur in higher education rely on what Freire (1970) refers to as the banking style of education, where instructors/professors hold all the pertinent knowledge related to the course and their job is to transfer that knowledge to students. The assumption of the banking style of education is that students have little to no knowledge currency. Often, this results in unidirectional learning settings where instructors make knowledge deposits to students. To counteract inequitable learning settings, Webb and Alvarez (2018) argue for the importance of moving "beyond an adult-centered or institution-focused approach to social capital and wellbeing" and toward "community-building capacities and cultural agency" (p. 419) for students and instructors within schooling settings. Many pedagogical theorists have countered banking styles of education; however, the context of such research usually lies in K-12 school settings, rather than in higher education settings (K.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (36)

  1. Since co-authors of three or more are often graduate students, community members, and/or junior scholars, we feel it is important to include their names in first reference for in-text citations. This runs counter to the APA Style Guide (7 th ed.).
  2. Archibald, J. (2008). Indigenous storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. UBC Press.
  3. Ayvazian, A., & Tatum, B. D. (2004). Women, race, and racism. In J. V. Jordan, M. Walker, & L. M. Hartling (Eds.), The complexity of connection: Writings from the Stone Center's Jean Baker Miller Training Institute (pp. 147-164). The Guilford Press.
  4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.
  5. Bennett, C. (2001). Genres of research in multicultural education. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 171-217. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002171
  6. Bozalek, V., Ng'ambi, D., Wood, D., Herrington, J., Hardman, J., & Amory, A. (2014). Activity theory, authentic learning and emerging technologies: Towards a transformative higher education pedagogy. Routledge.
  7. Brayboy, B., Gough, H., Leonard, B., Roehl, R., II, & Solyom, J. (2012). Reclaiming scholarship: Critical indigenous research methodologies. In S. D. Lapan, M. T. Quartaroli, & F. J. Riemer (Eds.), Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs (pp. 423-450). Jossey-Bass.
  8. Calderon, D. (2016). Moving from damage-centered research through unsettling reflexivity: Moving from damage-centered research. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 47(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12132
  9. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed). Sage.
  10. Denzin, N. K. (2014). Interpretive autoethnography (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  11. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
  12. Giroux, H. (1997). Rewriting the discourse of racial identity: Towards a pedagogy and politics of whiteness. Harvard Educational Review, 67(2), 285-321. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.2.r4523gh4176677u8
  13. Golden, N. A. (2017). "In a position I see myself in:" (Re)positioning identities and culturally-responsive pedagogies. Equity & Excellence in Education, 50(4), 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2017.1393641
  14. Green, T. L. (2017). From positivism to critical theory: School-community relations toward community equity literacy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(4), 370-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09518398.2016.1253892
  15. Gutierrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005019
  16. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
  17. Kinloch, V., & San Pedro, T. (2014). The space between listening and story-ing: Foundations for Projects in Humanization (PiH). In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing Research. (pp. 21-42). Sage Publication.
  18. Kirkland, D. (2013, March 25). Beyond multiculturalism [Blog post]. https://davidekirkland.wordpress.com/2013/03/ 25/beyong-multiculturalism/
  19. Kovach, M. E. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press.
  20. Lee, C. (2017). An ecological framework for enacting culturally sustaining pedagogies. In D. Paris & H. S. Alim (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 261-274). Teachers College Press.
  21. McCarty, T., & Lee, T. (2014). Critical culturally sustaining/revitalizing pedagogy and indigenous education sovereignty. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 101-124. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.q83746nl5pj34216
  22. Palmer, P. (1999). The grace of great things: Reclaiming the sacred. In S. Glazer (Ed.), The heart of learning (pp. 15-32). Penguin.
  23. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy a needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
  24. Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
  25. Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
  26. Patel, L. (2015). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. Routledge.
  27. Patel, L. (2016). Pedagogies of resistance and survivance: Learning as marronage. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49 (4), 397-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2016.1227585
  28. Rampton, B. (2003). Hegemony, social class and stylisation. Pragmatics, 13(1), 49-83. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.13\. 1.03ram
  29. San Pedro, T. (2013). Understanding youth cultures, stories, and resistances in the urban southwest: Innovations and implications of a Native American literature classroom. ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (UMI 3558673).
  30. San Pedro, T. (2017). 'This stuff interests me': Re-centering indigenous paradigms in colonizing schooling spaces. In D. Paris & H. S. Alim (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogy: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. (pp. 99-116). Teachers College Press.
  31. San Pedro, T. (2018). Abby as Ally: An argument for culturally disruptive pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 55(6), 1193-1232.
  32. San Pedro, T., Carlos, E., & Mburu, J. (2017). Critical listening and storying: Fostering respect for difference and action within and beyond a native American literature classroom. Urban Education, 52(5), 667-693. https://doi.org/10\. 1177/0042085915623346
  33. San Pedro, T., & Kinloch, V. (2017). Toward projects in humanization: Research on co-creating and sustaining dialogic relationships. American Educational Research Journal [Centennial Issue], 54(1), 373S-394S. https://doi.org/ 10.3102/0002831216671210
  34. Tachine, A. R., Cabrera, N. L., & Yellow Bird, E. (2017). Home away from home: Native American students' sense of belonging during their first year in college. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 785-807. https://doi.org/10\. 1080/00221546.2016.1257322
  35. Webb, A., & Alvarez, P. (2018). Counteracting victimization in unequal educational contexts: Latin American migrants' friendship dynamics in Chilean schools. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(3-4), 416-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2019.1582377
  36. Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Pub.