Social Audits and Multinational Company Supply Chain: A Study of Rituals of Social Audits in the Bangladesh Garment Industry (original) (raw)
Related papers
Dynamics of Social Auditing in the Global Textile and Apparel Supply Chain
Pivoting for the Pandemic, 2020
In the past three decades global sourcing of textiles and apparels (T&A) from developing countries is on the rise. However, international retailers' received criticism on their ability to manage social non-compliances at supplier factories. Retailers are implementing code of conduct policies to ensure conformity with social standards and avoiding businesses with non-complaint suppliers (Jaiswal & Brookshire, 2018). One of the major tool retailers use across the global apparel value chain is social auditing, which is a workplace assessment and a way of measuring, understanding, reporting, and ultimately improving an organization's social and ethical performance (Hussain, 2015). International retailers require apparel manufacturing firms from developing countries to conduct social audits and get accreditation as a precondition to the commercial relationship (Sanders, Cope, & Pulsipher, 2018). Social audits are meant to identify any violations of workers' rights in production facilities; assess suppliers' social performance; and improve overall workplace standards. However, incidences such as Ali Enterprises fire in Pakistan and collapse of Rana Plaza building in Bangladesh suggest flaws in the current practices of social auditing and indicate gaps to understand dynamics of auditing process. Several issues such as time, pressure, budget constraints, social ties, management control, national and organizational culture, etc. affects audit quality (
Social auditing in the supply chain: business legitimisation strategy rather than a change agent
Meditari Accountancy Research, 2022
Purpose-This paper aims to examine the role of social auditing in legitimising the relationship between the buyer and supplier firms rather than strengthening corporate accountability in the global supply chain. Design/methodology/approach-Applying case study methodology and drawing on Suchman's theory on societal legitimacy, it is argued that social audits are artefacts of legitimacy, and global firms dominate the buyer-supplier relationship across the supply chain. The analysis is based on data collected from different secondary sources, including Walmart's corporate sustainability reports. Findings-Using Walmart's relationship with Tazreen Fashions Limited around the Tazreen factory fire incident as a case study, it explains that the practices which attempt to symbolically demonstrate accountability from social audits need to shift to a more continuous and sincere demonstration of accountability through the social audit process. For this to occur, the cognitive and pragmatic approaches that international buyers have previously used in auditing their supply firms' social responsibility are no longer sufficient to achieve societal legitimacy. Instead, a moral turn needs to underpin the intentions and actions of these buyers to maintain legitimacy and demonstrate accountability across the supply industry in developing economies. Originality/value-The findings of the study answer the questions raised in the extant literature about the expectation from social auditing and whether social auditing serves to ensure corporate accountability. The paper contributes to the policymaking discussion of how social auditing can be configured to include a legal provision to ensure that social auditing is not a parroting tool for corporations.
Human Relations
This paper reports the findings of a field study on the emergence of collective agreements led by global brands enacting compliance measures to improve safety and working conditions in the Bangladesh garment industry. We explore how key actors in the Bangladesh garment sector who constitute the local production system of the global supply chain experienced the implementation of global agreements on factory safety. We argue that global safety compliance measures through multi-stakeholder initiatives provide legitimacy to multinational corporations and their global brands but do little to address the structural problems arising from exploitative pricing and procurement practices, which are the key reasons for deplorable working conditions in garment factories. Our findings indicate that neoliberal development policies of the state where local economies are incorporated into global production networks resulted in differential treatment and regulation of specific populations that comprise garment factory workers. The reconfiguration of state power to meet the demands of global supply chains also involved use of state violence to suppress dissent while undermining labour rights and working conditions. Our paper contributes to the politicization of multinational corporations in global production chains by showing how contestations between workers, factory owners, the state, trade unions and multinational corporations create new private forms of governance and new regimes of compliance in the industry.
Journal of Operations Management, 2016
For sustainability, research in operations and supply chain management historically emphasized the development of environmental rather than social capabilities. However, factory disasters in Bangladesh, an emerging market and the second largest clothing exporter in the world, revealed enormous challenges in the implementation of social sustainability in complex global supply chains. Against the backdrop of a building collapse in Bangladesh's clothing industry, this research uses multiple case studies from two time periods to explore the skills, practices, relationships and processes e collectively termed "social management capabilities" (SMCs) e that help buyers and suppliers respond to stakeholder pressures; address regulatory gaps; and improve social performance. The study not only captures the perspectives of both multinational buyers and their emerging market suppliers, but also provides supplementary evidence from other key stakeholders, such as NGOs and unions. Our findings show that, in the absence of intense stakeholder pressure, buyers can lay the foundation for improved social performance by using their own auditors and collaborating with suppliers rather than using third-party auditors. However, in the face of acute attention from customers, NGOs and media, we observed that consultative buyer-consortium audits emerged, and shared third-party audits offered other advantages such as increased transparency and improvements in worker education and training. Finally, we present research propositions derived from our empirical study to guide future research on implementing social sustainability in emerging markets.
Closing the Governance Gap: From CSR to enforceable agreements in the global garment industry
This research starts with a simple premise: namely, that the statist model of labour regulation is increasingly anachronistic as it fails to cover transnational corporations (TNCs) and their global supply chains. The garment industry has not only become a textbook example of how economic globalisation has led to poor and unsafe working conditions; it has also become a laboratory for new forms of transnational collective bargaining. This research will look at five different worker-driven strategies for engaging TNCs in a system of negotiated supply chain accountability. It will examine the counter-hegemonic potential of these initiatives to challenge corporate-led globalisation and to chart alternative paths of corporate accountability. As such, it seeks to contribute to new discourses and socio-legal strategies on advancing social justice within global supply chains.
Governing Global Supply Chain Sustainability through the Ethical Audit Regime
Globalizations
Over the past two decades multinational corporations have been expanding ‘ethical’ audit programs with the stated aim of reducing the risk of sourcing from suppliers with poor practices. A wave of government regulation—such as the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act (2012) and the UK Modern Slavery Act (2015)—has enhanced the legitimacy of auditing as a tool to govern labor and environmental standards in global supply chains, backed by a broad range of civil society actors championing audits as a way of promoting corporate accountability. The growing adoption of auditing as a governance tool is a puzzling trend, given two decades of evidence that audit programs generally fail to detect or correct labor and environmental problems in global supply chains. Drawing on original field research, this article shows that in spite of its growing legitimacy and traction among government and civil society actors, the audit regime continues to respond to and protect industry commercial interests. Conceptually, the article challenges prevailing characterizations of the audit regime as a technical, neutral, and benign tool of supply chain governance, and highlights its embeddedness in struggles over the legitimacy and effectiveness of the industry-led privatization of global governance.
The Limits of Voluntary Governance Programs: Auditing Labor Rights in the Global Apparel Industry
2011
Corporations have increasingly turned to voluntary, multi-stakeholder governance programs to monitor workers' rights and standards in the global apparel industry. While much has been written on whether, in general terms, these Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs are or are not effective, the literature has not fully explored under what conditions these programs fail and succeed. This paper argues that CSR effectiveness varies significantly depending on stakeholder involvement and issue areas under examination. Corporateinfluenced programs can be effective in detecting and remediating minimum wage, hour, and occupational safety and health violations because addressing these issues provides corporations with legitimacy and reduces the risks of uncertainty created by activist campaigns. Corporate-influenced programs, however, are less effective in ensuring workers' right to form unions, bargain, and strike because these rights are perceived as lessening managerial control. I explore this argument by first contrasting corporate and labor-influenced programs, and then analyzing 730 factory audits of the Fair Labor Association between 2002 and 2009. This analysis is complemented with a case study of Russell Athletic in Honduras. Since the 1990s, there has been a considerable shift toward voluntary, multi-stakeholder governance mechanisms to monitor compliance with labor standards and rights in the global economy (Fung et al. 2001; 2007; Rodríguez-Garavito 2005; Seidman 2007). These-Corporate Social Responsibility‖ (CSR) initiatives are a response to new challenges presented by economic globalization, notably corporate efforts to oversee the operations of increasingly-complex global supply chains. As media exposés and social movement activists highlight extreme labor abuses in factories producing for well-known global brands, corporations have been pushed to monitor their employment relations practices through multi-stakeholder programs. 1 The author thanks Dong Fang and Katherine Cornejo for their research assistance in coding FLA factory audits.
Review of International Political Economy, 2019
Workers' rights violations have been pervasive in many global supply chains. In the apparel sector, production workers often face precarious working conditions, including persistently low pay, excessive and often forced overtime, unsafe buildings, and repression of their right to form unions and bargain collectively. This article explores how purchasing practices of lead firms adversely affect working conditions and workers' rights in supplier factories. It attributes these trends to a price squeeze and a sourcing squeeze in which lead firms pay increasing lower prices to suppliers while also imposing short lead times and high order volatility. To test this argument, trade data of apparel imports to the United States and the European Union are explored. The article then turns to original surveys of Bangladesh supplier factories and workers carried out in 2016 and 2017. The final section of this paper examines the impact of the squeeze on working conditions and workers' rights using the Labour Rights Indicators.
2013
There have been multiple calls to examine the issues surrounding exploitation of workers in Ready Made Factories in Bangladesh in their own right. In response to their call this study presents a preliminary exploration into the social compliance system within RMG factories by taking support of the compliance theory established in management literature. In-depth interviews and observations of 50 workers and managers from three large RMG factories are used in the study. An initial guiding framework for social compliance system is developed to assess the capabilities and commitment of RMG workers and managers and suggests managerial implication to RMG firms on ways to socially comply with fair work practices in their factories.
Power to the People? Private Regulatory Initiatives, Human Rights and Supply Chain Capitalism (D. Brinks, J. Dehm & K. Engle, eds) (Penn Press), 2020
In this chapter I engage with a number of critical case studies written by scholars and advocates regarding efforts to improve human rights outcomes in global supply chains through private regulatory initiatives (PRIs). More particularly, I suggest that situating these PRIs in the political economy of corporate power that I and others term “supply chain capitalism” helps to explain many of the difficulties PRIs have had in achieving their justice objectives. My argument proceeds in three parts. First, I give more context to the political economy of supply chain capitalism and suggest why it is significant for development policy, inequality, and human rights outcomes in global supply structures. Next, I argue that the power imbalances and competitive conditions that predominate in supply chain capitalism are a significant factor contributing to the limited justice impact of the PRIs. I conclude with some suggestions for ways in which PRIs might increase their impact by using their unique knowledge, organizational capacity, and relationships in particular supply chains to challenge the concentrations of corporate power that are shaping the unjust distributional and human rights outcomes of supply chain capitalism.