A Learning Pathway to an Integrated Approach Involving Natural, Applied and Social Science, Humanities and Arts to Face Climate Change (original) (raw)
Related papers
Exploring Climate Change through Science and in Society
Exploring Climate Change through Science and in Society 'I doubt that anyone on Earth can match Mike Hulme's deep understanding of both the scientific and social aspects of climate change. Yet of course what really matters, and what is so clearly on display in this volume, is the way he combines, with a sensibility that is at once rigorous and enormously generous, these two knowledge domains to provide insight and, indeed, wisdom into the true and many meanings of climate change.' Dan Sarewitz, Arizona State University, USA 'Climate change was first an issue of climate science. But climate change is now mostly a political process, which needs recognition of its diverse cultural dimensions. Mike Hulme allows us to follow this development by presenting himself as an involved person, who has learned that climate change is not a matter of preaching the truth but of us deciding how we want to live.
Climate change – the challenge of translating scientific knowledge into action
International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2011
In spite of solid scientific evidence that anthropogenic climate change will affect the conditions for life on earth, little climate action is taking place. This paper discusses this apparent paradox. The main message is that lack of climate action has to do with the ways in which climate change interlinks with society. Climate change is representative of what in the paper is defined as 'modern environmental problems'. Unlike 'traditional' environmental problems, 'modern' environmental problems are 'internal' to society and are 'societal' problems as much as they are environmental problems. The paper discusses how climate change must be understood in an overlapping interface between nature and society, and based on this theoretical analysis the paper discusses a number of contradictions and paradoxes illuminating the problems of linking knowledge and climate action. The concluding section calls for new methodological approaches to linking knowledge and climate action.
Syllabus: Climate Change: Disciplinary Challenges to the Humanities & the Social Sciences A Special Workshop at the Neubauer Collegium for Culture and Society, 2015-16 Faculty sponsors: Emily Osborn, Benjamin Morgan and Fredrik Albritton Jonsson Visiting speakers: Joshua Howe, Jason Kelly, Tobias Menely, Christophe Bonneuil, and Jason Moore Graduate Assistant: Michael Dango The problem of climate change forces us to rethink many of the basic analytical categories in the humanities and humanistic social sciences. Within the humanities, writers and artists are experimenting with new ways in which their practices can catalyze environmental awareness, and emerging research is beginning to integrate the history of culture with the history of the earth’s climate. This project will bring together faculty and graduate students from across the humanities, natural sciences, and social sciences in a reading group. We are especially interested in the place of the humanities in meeting the challenge of climate change. How might humanistic perspectives inform the science and politics of climate change? We will also consider how climate change is transforming our understanding of history, politics, literature, and ethics, inspiring new approaches within the humanities.
The Importance of the Humanities to the Climate Change Debate
This chapter examines connections between the humanities (understood as a grouping of academic disciplines that include history, philosophy, literature, language, art and music) and climate change. The relationship between the two has a long and complex past; a past that has informed, directed and helped co-create the current debate and its understanding as a 'crisis'.
An Education Guide to Climate Futures
Turn it around! An education guide to climate futures, 2022
For more than six decades, scientists have warned us of the catastrophic effects of the escalating climate crisis on the planet and people. The United Nations (UN) member states have met annually since the mid-1990s at the UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP) meetings, setting goals and delivering metrics, making promises and offering hope, but failing to enforce policy action. The recent UN COP 26 in Glasgow fell short of keeping the goal of 1.5°C global heating alive as measured against its own objectives. Despite booming policy declarations and deafening science alarms, we have yet to see the radical change in the existing systems and institutions, lifestyles and behaviors, and mindsets and hearts. Perhaps by their very objectivity, the words and numbers distance us from the searing heat of a wildfire or the smell of fear and despair as animals and humans watch the floods wash away their homes and witness the fires burn their habitats. They also reduce the complexity of intertwined webs of life by fragmenting our common planetary home into isolated ‘problems’ to be managed and fixed without addressing a much larger challenge of dismantling unjust systems and reconfiguring our relationships with each other and the planet.Building on the scientific evidence and keeping in focus policy promises made over the decades, this report mobilizes the power of socially engaged art to bring together visions and voices of youth from across the globe in a collective effort to address the root causes of the climate crisis. It starts with the premise that education is directly implicated in the climate crisis and our failure to imagine alternatives. But it can also be the catalyst for radical change. Aiming to shift and shuffle the dominant knowledge systems and categories with the cards from the Turn It Around! deck, this report urges you to turn toward the reality of the climate crisis by capturing its devastating impacts from youth perspectives in a way statistical data might not. It challenges existing education policies, practices, and patterns as no longer possible, tolerable, or even thinkable. With the powerful imagination and creativity of youth, the report activates a series of turning points — intergenerational, decolonial, methodological, and pedagogical — in order to turn around the environmental catastrophe, while reconfiguring the role of education toward ecologically just and sustainable futures. Recognizing that most of the human-induced damages on earth are irreversible, we invite you to follow these turns in order to unlearn harmful patterns and begin relearning how to be a part of the Earth’s ecological community. The invitation to Turn it Around! is more than an urgent call to action — it is now the responsibility of every reader to re-imagine education and work out new ways of living with the Earth.
Climate change: A discourse of our contemporary world
Mucahit Coskun and Gbadeyanka Gbadebo Edward, 2021
The academic community has been contentious in the discourse regarding climate change. This study aims to conduct an indepth investigation and assessment of the past years' articles with a crystal focus on how often climate change is mentioned in our sampled articles. The statistical data originated from Taylor & Francis's publications focused and limited yearly. Vital literature review and citations are equally considered with 211 articles. The evaluation showed no notable change in the number of articles published in the context of research. Instead, it revealed the articles that believe and denied the phenomenon of climate change, climate change education and strategies, and people's knowledge and attitude towards climate change. The articles assessing quantitative and qualitative or mixed research were significantly valued through detailed calculation and critical discussion. There is a need to collaborate ideas from different fields of life to unify climate change ideas into educational science networks.
Climate change studies and the human sciences
Poul Holm, Verena Winiwarter, Climate change studies and the human sciences, In Global and Planetary Change, Volume 156, 2017, Pages 115-122, ISSN 0921-8181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.05.006\. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092181811630306X), 2017
Policy makers have made repeated calls for integration of human and natural sciences in the field of climate change. Serious multidisciplinary attempts began already in the 1950s. Progress has certainly been made in understanding the role of humans in the planetary system. New perspectives have clarified policy advice, and three insights are singled out in the paper: the critique of historicism, the distinction between benign and wicked problems, and the cultural critique of the ‘myths of nature’. Nevertheless, analysis of the IPCC Assessment Reports indicates that integration is skewed towards a particular dimension of human sciences (economics) and major insights from cultural theory and historical analysis have not made it into climate science. A number of relevant disciplines are almost absent in the composition of authorship. Nevertheless, selective assumptions and arguments are made about e.g. historical findings in key documents. In conclusion, we suggest to seek remedies for the lack of historical scholarship in the IPCC reports. More effort at science-policy exchange is needed, and an Integrated Platform to channel humanities and social science expertise for climate change research might be one promising way.