International Journal of Testing 2013 Reviewers (original) (raw)

2023

The International Bibliography of Historical Sciences (I. B. O. H. S.) is a selective and descriptive bibliography, and the works it mentions, both books and articles, are arranged according to a methodical and chronological scheme originally drawn up and established by the Bibliographical Commission of the International Committee of Historical Sciences; the scheme has been revised only in details. The volume LXXXVII, 2018 mentions the works published with the date 2018. The I. B. O. H. S. mentions the works published in the following languages: Afrikaans, Arab, Azerbaijani, Belarusian, Bengali, Bulgarian, Castilian Spanish, Catalan, Chinese, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Kurdish, Latin, Latvian, Lithuanian, Norwegian, Panjabi, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Slovak, Swahili, Swedish, Tamil, Turkish, Ukrainian.

Brief of 13,922 Current Law Students at Accredited American Law Schools as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondants, Grutter v. Bollinger, No. 02-241 (US Feb. …

2003

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

Acknowledgement to reviewers 2009

Emergency Radiology, 2009

Consistent high-quality of papers published in “Chemico-Biological Interactions” can only be maintained with the co-operation and dedication of a number of expert referees. The Editors would like to thank all those who have donated the hours necessary to review, evaluate and comment on manuscripts; their conscientious efforts have enabled the journal to maintain its tradition of excellence. We are grateful to the following reviewers for their contributions during 2009.

Thank you to all of our reviewers in 2020

Communications Biology

5314 individual reviewers contributed to the peer review process at Communications Biology in 2020. We acknowledge and thank each of them here.

Thank You to Reviewers 2018

Cancer, 2018

Cancer's reputation is determined by the quality of the manuscripts submitted and the expertise, dedication, and promptness of the individuals who critically review the manuscripts. We here at Cancer are therefore pleased to continue our Outstanding Reviewer Recognition Program. This program is meant to congratulate and acknowledge our top reviewers for their outstanding peer review efforts from the period spanning from September 1, 2017, through August 31, 2018. These individuals go beyond expectations by consistently and expeditiously delivering comprehensive, discerning reviews. The criteria involved in these selections include the number of reviews conducted per year; the quality and constructiveness of the reviews as rated by the Section Editors; and the timeliness of review completion. Cancer wishes to thank and congratulate the following conscientious and committed reviewers who are the 2018 recipients of this recognition. As a small token of our gratitude, Outstanding Reviewers will receive a 10% discount on OnlineOpen charges

International Journal of Testing 2013 Reviewers (original) (raw)

Related papers