The treatment of patients with infected implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems (original) (raw)
Related papers
Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2006
The prognosis for patients with ventricular arrhythmias has improved dramatically with the aid of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Although infection is a serious complication that frequently causes dysfunction and loss of ICDs, the frequency, predisposing risk-factors, and clinical and microbiological features are only partially understood. This study describes a retrospective review of 423 procedures in 278 patients with ICD primary implants and replacements performed at a tertiary-care hospital. Generators were placed in either a pectoral (68%) or abdominal (32%) site, and electrodes were placed transvenously in 97% of the patients. Most (95%) interventions were performed in a one-stage procedure. Infection developed with ten (2.4%) implanted devices. Four cases occurred within 30 days of surgery ('early infections') and six occurred > 1 month after surgery ('late infections'). In univariate analysis, factors associated with the development of an early infection were: two-stage surgery, a sub-costal approach, and abdominal generator placement. In patients with late infections, a significant association was found with trauma or decubitus ulcer in the generator area. Infection presented with local signs without systemic complications. Seven of the ten patients required complete removal of the system.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1997
TURKISHER, V., ET AL.: Successful Management of an Infected Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator with Oral Antibiotics and without Removal of the Device. Infection of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator developed 2 weeks after implantation, presenting with fever, swelling, redness, and tenderness of the skin above the generator site. A cloxacillin resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcus was repeatedly cultured from the abdominal wall pocket fluid. The infection was successfully treated with a combination of two antibiotics, fusidic acid and rifampin, given orally for 3 months. Although the device was not removed, infection did not recur during a 24-month follow-up.
Infections with Nonthoracotomy Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Can These Be Prevented?
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1998
Be Prevented? Nonthoracotomy ICDs are believed to be the best therapeutic modality for treatment of lifethreatening ventricular arrhythmias. Little is known about the risk of infection with initial implantation of these devices. We studied the incidence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors associated with infections in 1,831 patients with nonthoracotomy ICD from the Endotak-C nonthoracotomy lead registry of Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. A transvenous lead was implanted in 950 patients (51.9%) and a combination transvenous plus subcutaneous patch was used in 881 patients (48.1%). Nine preselected data variables were studied, and all investigators identified as having patients with infections were personally contacted. Infections occurred in 22 (1.2%) of 1,831 patients receiving this nonthoracotomy ICD system. The mean time to infection was 5.7 ± 6.5 months (range 1-25 months). Staphylococci were isolated in 58% of patients with reported infection. The presence of a subcutaneous defibrillator patch system was associated with the development of infection. Six of 950 patients (0.63%) with a totally transvenous lead system developed infection versus 16 of 838 (1.9%) patients with a transvenous lead plus subcutaneous patch system configuration (P = 0.015,, with an unadjusted estimated odds ratio of 3.06 ). The risk of infection encountered with the nonthoracotomy ICD is low, estimated from our data to be 1.2%. Placement of a subcutaneous defibrillator patch appears to be an independent risk factor for development of infection. (PACE 1998; 21[Pt. I]:42-55) infection, implantable cardioverter defibrillator Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are well-established as a successful therapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with lifethreatening arrhythmias.^^" From the early development of the ICD, Mirowski and Mower appreciated the feasihility and desirability of nonthoracotomy systems.^~^^ However, due to the many formidable technical challenges encoun-Address for reprints: Peter N, Smith, M.D., FACC, Marshfield Clinic,
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 1998
The objective of this report is to describe the characteristics of patients who develop infections associated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) implanted with sternotomy and thoracotomy approaches. A retrospective chart review identified all patients who underwent ICD implantation at a university medical center from November 1982 through February 1990. Several patient and procedural variables were compared between infected patients and noninfected patients. One hundred fifty-seven patients underwent 202 ICD generator implantations (45 generator changes), and nine of these patients developed infection (4.5% per implantation and 5.7% per patient). Of the patient variables analyzed, a significant correlation (P < .0001) was made only with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: 36% of diabetics versus 3.9% of nondiabetics were infected. The only patient- or procedure-specific variable that was found to correlate with the development of infection was the presence of diabetes mellitus.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1998
Be Prevented? Nonthoracotomy ICDs are believed to be the best therapeutic modality for treatment of lifethreatening ventricular arrhythmias. Little is known about the risk of infection with initial implantation of these devices. We studied the incidence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors associated with infections in 1,831 patients with nonthoracotomy ICD from the Endotak-C nonthoracotomy lead registry of Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. A transvenous lead was implanted in 950 patients (51.9%) and a combination transvenous plus subcutaneous patch was used in 881 patients (48.1%). Nine preselected data variables were studied, and all investigators identified as having patients with infections were personally contacted. Infections occurred in 22 (1.2%) of 1,831 patients receiving this nonthoracotomy ICD system. The mean time to infection was 5.7 ± 6.5 months (range 1-25 months). Staphylococci were isolated in 58% of patients with reported infection. The presence of a subcutaneous defibrillator patch system was associated with the development of infection. Six of 950 patients (0.63%) with a totally transvenous lead system developed infection versus 16 of 838 (1.9%) patients with a transvenous lead plus subcutaneous patch system configuration (P = 0.015,, with an unadjusted estimated odds ratio of 3.06 ). The risk of infection encountered with the nonthoracotomy ICD is low, estimated from our data to be 1.2%. Placement of a subcutaneous defibrillator patch appears to be an independent risk factor for development of infection. (PACE 1998; 21[Pt. I]:42-55) infection, implantable cardioverter defibrillator Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are well-established as a successful therapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with lifethreatening arrhythmias.^^" From the early development of the ICD, Mirowski and Mower appreciated the feasihility and desirability of nonthoracotomy systems.^~^^ However, due to the many formidable technical challenges encoun-Address for reprints: Peter N, Smith, M.D., FACC, Marshfield Clinic,
The American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
Infection is an uncommon (0% to 6.7%) but serious complication after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. All ICD primary implants, replacements, or revisions performed at the Massachusetts General Hospital between April 1983 and May 1999 were reviewed. A total of 21 ICD-related infections (1.2%) were identified among 1,700 procedures affecting 1.8% of the 1,170 patients who underwent a primary implant, a generator change, or a revision of their systems. The mean follow-up time was 35 ؎ 33 months. Of the 959 patients with long-term follow-up, 19 of the 584 patients (3.2%) with abdominal and 2 of the 375 patients (0.5%) with pectoral systems developed ICD-related infections (p ؍ 0.03). There was no significant difference between the infection rate among the 959 primary ICD implants and the 447 replacements or system revisions. Only 5 of the patients (24%) had systemic signs of infection, including fever (T>100.5) and elevated white blood count >12,000. Cultures from the wound revealed staphylococcal species in 16 patients (76%). Nineteen patients were treated with removal of the entire ICD system in addition to intravenous antibiotics for 2 to 4 weeks. A decrease in the incidence of ICD-related infection has occurred since the advent of transvenous pectoral systems. The main organism responsible for ICD infection is Staphylococcus. The mainstay of ICD infection management consists of complete removal of the entire implanted system. ᮊ2001
Management and Outcome of Permanent Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Infections
Journal of The American College of Cardiology, 2007
We describe the management and outcome of permanent pacemaker (PPM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) infections in a large cohort of patients seen at a tertiary care facility with expertise in device lead extraction.Infection is a serious complication of PPM and ICD implantation. Optimal care of patients with these cardiac device infections (CDI) is not well defined.A retrospective review of all patients with CDI admitted to Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2003, was conducted. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and descriptive analysis was performed.A total of 189 patients met the criteria for CDI (138 PPM, 51 ICD). The median age of the patients was 71.2 years. Generator pocket infection (69%) and device-related endocarditis (23%) were the most common clinical presentations. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus, in 42% and 29% of cases, respectively, were the leading pathogens for CDI. Most patients (98%) underwent complete device removal. Duration of antibiotic therapy after device removal was based on clinical presentation and causative organism (median duration of 18 days for pocket infection vs. 28 days for endocarditis; 28 days for S. aureus infection vs. 14 days for coagulase-negative staphylococci infection [p < 0.001]). Median follow-up after hospital discharge was 175 days. Ninety-six percent of patients were cured with both complete device removal and antibiotic administration.Cure of CDI is achievable in the large majority of patients treated with an aggressive approach of combined antimicrobial treatment and complete device removal. Based on findings of our large retrospective institutional survey and previously published data, we submit proposed management guidelines of CDI.
Permanent Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Infection
Archives of Internal Medicine, 2007
Background: The incidence of cardiac device infection is not well understood. Bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients with permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (hereafter, defibrillators) may reflect device infection. Methods: Retrospective, population-based cohort study of all adult patients with cardiac devices who resided in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1975 to 2004. The medical linkage-system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project and standardized criteria were used to identify all cases of BSI and device infection. The incidence of device infection was calculated with person-years of follow-up after device implantation. Results: A total of 1524 patients with cardiac devices were included in the cohort. Total person-time of follow-up was 7578 years. The incidence of definite device infection was 1.9 per 1000 device-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.1). The incidence of pocket infection without BSI was 1.37 per 1000 device-years (95% CI, 0.62-3.05), and pocket infection with BSI or devicerelated endocarditis 1.14 per 1000 device years (95% CI, 0.47-2.74). The cumulative probability of device infection was higher among patients with defibrillators compared with those with pacemakers, PϽ.001. Twelve (54.6%) of 22 cases of Staphylococcus aureus BSI had definite or possible cardiac device infection vs 3 (12.0%) of 25 cases of bloodstream infection due to gram-negative bacilli (P=.004). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first population-based study to describe the incidence of cardiac device infection. Device infection was common during episodes of S aureus BSI. The rate of cardiac device infection was higher in patients with defibrillators than in those with pacemakers.