Enforcing Copyright Online in Scandinavia: Economic Consequences of Nuances in National Implementations of International Law (original) (raw)
Related papers
Mediating Surveillance: The Developing Landscape of European Online Copyright Enforcement
Journal of Contemporary European Research, 2013
After a period of relative laissez faire, governments around the world are beginning to attempt to regulate online life, for a variety of reasons, through various mechanisms of surveillance and control. The drive to enforce the respect of copyright is at the forefront of these attempts, a highly controversial topic which pits proponents of the rights of the creative industry against advocates of freedom of speech. Apart from their inflammatory nature, one distinguishing characteristic of most of these schemes is that they are mediated: that is, they are conducted with the help of third parties, most often internet service providers. The mediation of surveillance is something as yet relatively underexplored by the field of surveillance studies, whose theoretical tools are by and large focussed on a two way relationship between watcher and watched. This article seeks to remedy this deficit, by examining the dynamics of mediation in the context of online copyright enforcement. We argue that, far from being a neutral process, the displacement of surveillance to third parties has a crucial impact on the way in which it is conducted. In particular, the expanding capacity of mediators becomes a reason for justifying surveillance in and of itself.
The European Political Order and Internet Piracy: Accidental or Paradigmatic Constitution-Shaping?
European Constitutional Law Review, 2010
Modern age technology spurs legal development – Temporal coincidence of conflicting national and Union legislative processes triggers interdependence between EU and member states – French Loi Hadopi cuts Internet without recourse to a court – Conseil constitutionnel enshrines Internet as fundamental freedom – EU telecoms reform incorporates several French fundamental rights safeguards
The role of Internet intermediaries in copyright law online enforcement
This chapter discusses the importance of copyright law enforcement as a prerequisite for the emergence of a digital single market. It firstly analyzes the reasons for the current crisis in copyright law enforcement and focuses on the role of Internet intermediaries in this context. The question is examined of whether the Internet intermediary's liability should have been abandoned fifteen years ago with the enactment of the E-commerce Directive, whereby the intermediaries' safe harbor was established. However, this chapter shows that the law itself, together with an audacious jurisprudential interpretation, leads in practice to the application of a fault-based approach to Internet intermediaries' liability. As this evolution is obviously not sufficient to resolve the issue of online enforcement of copyright law, this analysis is supplemented by the emerging topic of gag orders. This method, combined with the trends in case law related to pan-European judicial orders, despite being incomplete, nowadays offers the most promising solution towards effective copyright law enforcement.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019
an attorney admitted in Italy, Argentina and in the State of Illinois, currently practicing in Chicago. I graduated with an LLM in International Intellectual Property at Chicago-Kent College of Law in May 2019 with honors. I express immense gratitude to my daughter Jasmine who supported me during my studies and to my mother. I would like to also thank my professors in Legal Writing: Edward Lee and Runhua Wang, as well as, professors: Alain Villeneuve, for his encouragement; and Graeme Dinwoodie, for precipitating my great interest in international copyright issues.
Behind the Scenes of Online Copyright Enforcement: Empirical Evidence on Notice & Takedown
Copyright enforcement was one of the early challenges to the rule of law on the internet and has shaped its development since the early 1990s. The Notice and Takedown (N&TD) regime, enacted in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, offered online intermediaries immunity from liability in exchange for removing allegedly infringing materials upon receiving notice from rights holders. The unequivocal power of rights holders to request removal and the strong incentives for online intermediaries to remove content upon receiving a removal request have turned the N&TD regime into a robust clean-up mechanism for removing any unwarranted content. The N&TD procedure applies to private facilities, makes use of proprietary software, and is administered by private companies. This enforcement procedure is nontransparent and lacks sufficient legal or public oversight. Unlike copyright enforcement in court, where decisions are made public, we know very little about the actual implementation of the N&TD regime: Which players make use of the system? Who is targeted? What materials get removed and why? How effective is the removal of infringing materials, and does it comply with copyright law? This Article offers empirical evidence on the implementation of the N&TD regime based on the systematic coding and analysis of a large-scale data-set of removal requests sent to Google Search. The findings shed light on the major changes that have taken place in copyright enforcement following the transition to the online arena over the past decade. Analysis of the data reveals that the N&TD procedure has been extensively used to remove noninfringing materials, and most removal requests pertained to allegedly inaccurate, defamatory, or misleading content. These findings raise serious concerns that the N&TD procedure is becoming fertile ground for misuse. Moreover, online enforcement is dominated by multinational companies, which prefer to target global intermediaries rather than attempt to remove materials hosted by local platforms. This may lead to underenforcement of copyright online, as the exclusive focus on removal of links to allegedly infringing materials may limit access to these materials, yet fail to actually remove these same materials. The local hosting platforms which facilitates access to repeat infringments, are widely known within the relevant community of users. This calls into question the effectiveness of this enforcement strategy. At the same time, however, the data demonstrates instances of overenforcement, where some materials have been removed on questionable grounds. Thus, the findings raise concerns over the implications of the N&TD regime for access to knowledge and freedom of speech. Overall, the study shows that in the absence of sufficient oversight, the N&TD regime is vulnerable to misuse, carrying consequences to copyright goals, access to justice, and due process. By uncovering the invisible dynamics at work in online copyright enforcement, this Article may contribute to identifying the challenges facing policymakers in shaping online enforcement procedures and developing the appropriate measures to address them.
Anti-Piracy laws: Mobilization process at the European Union
Abstract Current regulations and policy initiatives concerning copyright and the Internet use of content in multiple countries have generated a strong lobby process which includes a media campaign between the different agents who consider these regulations essential for their interests. The entertainment industry argues that some uses of new technologies are a risk for their business and because of that they lobby for strong policies against piracy and the free use of content by search engines.
ISPss Copyright Liability in the EU Digital Single Market Strategy
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017
The EU Commission is eager to reform the current rules governing Internet Service Providers' copyright liability. According to the Commission, online services providing access to copyright protected content uploaded by their users without the involvement of right holders have become main sources of access to content online. This affects right holders' possibilities to determine whether, and under which conditions, their works and other subject-matters are used as well as their possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration for them (value gap). In order to close the reported value gap between right holders and online platforms, the Proposal for a Directive on copyright within the Digital Single Market strategy endorses a wider definition of the communication to the public and imposes new control obligations on ISPs. Such a policy choice raises some concerns. First, it is doubtful whether the Proposal is consistent with both the interpretation of the notion of communication to the public provided by the European Court of Justice case law and the safe harbor granted by the E-Commerce Directive. Moreover, the Proposal is not supported by any empirical evidence. The lack of robust statistical evidence of displacement of sales by online copyright infringements undermines the ratio of the intervention, that is, the reported value gap and the consequent need to assure the right holders of an adequate remuneration for the circulation of works on the Internet.
National and International Dimensions of Copyright Law in the Information Age
ABSTRACT: Despite international and European cooperation, copyright law remains a predominantly national affair dominated by national policy. The article examines if this framework is up to the challenges presented by the internet. Two problems are found: the laws of all the receiving countries apply to an internet publications, and these laws often differ substantially. This is so because states wish to remain free to draft national copyright policy and apply it to their public sphere. As a consequence, exemptions from copyright protection are not harmonised. Using the example of digital libraries and the problem of copyright protected works whose right holders are unknown or unlocatable (so-called orphan works), the article demonstrates how divergence of laws impairs internet-related use of copyrighted materials. As these orphan works cannot legally be used, an exemption from copyright protection may be warranted. However, to facilitate online distribution, an international approach is required. This article discusses the possibilities of such an approach by means of choice of law, and harmonisation and unification of copyright law in the EU.
Intellectual property law compliance in Europe: Illegal file sharing and the role of social norms
New Media & Society, Volume 14, Number 7, 2012
The gap between copyright law and social norms has been widely discussed. We have empirically shown the existence of this gap. Theoretically founded in the sociology of law, the study uses a well-defined concept of norms to measure changes in the strength of social norms before and after a legal implementation. The ”IPRED law” was on 1 April 2009 implemented in Sweden, following the EU IPR Enforcement Directive 2004/48/EC. The law aims at enforcing copyright, as well as other IP rights, when violated, especially online. We conducted a survey three months before the IPRED law was implemented in Sweden, and the survey was repeated six months after. The about 1000 respondents between 15 and 25 years-of-age showed, among other things, that although the actual file sharing behaviour had to some extent decreased, the social norms remained unaffected by the law.