Meaningful expression of uncertainty in measurement (original) (raw)
Related papers
Intrinsic uncertainty in measurement: an interpretation model for metrological standards
Measurement, 1990
The role of uncertainty in the acquisition and processing of experimental data has fundamental relevance, both theoretical and practical, for the metrological assessment of technology. The restitution procedures have been based, traditionally, on the 'error theory' and exploit a mainly statistical formulation in order to approach the 'true value'. In the note the alternative framework, recently proposed by the Italian Standard (UN14546, 1984), based on the concept of 'intrinsic uncertainty', is recalled and the related restitution procedures are discussed, with explicit reference to a probabilistic formulation.
Uncertainty in Measurement: Some Thoughts about its Expressing and Processing
Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 2003
The paper discusses the concept of non-exactness of measurement results, and analyzes it by clearly distinguishing between (i) the way the results are expressed to make their uncertainty explicit; (ii) the way the chosen expression is interpreted as a suitable combination of non-specificity and uncertainty; (iii) the way the interpreted results are formally dealt with. In this perspective the merits and flaws of the ISO Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement are highlighted.
A Beginner's Guide to Uncertainty of Measurement
The ,aim of this ,Beginner’s Guide is to introduce ,the subject of measurement uncertainty. Every measurement,is subject to some,uncertainty. A measurement,result is only complete,if it is accompanied ,by a ,statement of the ,uncertainty in the ,measurement. Measurement uncertainties can come from the measuring instrument, from the item being measured, from the environment, from the operator, and from other sources. Such uncertainties can be estimated using statistical analysis of a set of measurements, and using other kinds of information about the measurement,process. There are established rules for how to calculate an
A Critical Note on the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM)
Economic Quality Control, 2008
In 1809 Carl Friedrich Gauss' masterpiece "Theoria Motus Corporum Coelestium in sectionibus conicis solem ambientium" on the motion of celestial bodies was published. This book contains also a first version of the famous error propagation formula, which is still the basis of modern metrology and of any relevant national and international standard. Gauss' ideas are reflected in the GUM, the "Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement", published in 1993 by ISO, which is a key document for national measurement institutes and industrial calibration laboratories for evaluating uncertainty in the output of a measurement system.
Measurement
The Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM) publishes and maintains reference documents relating to general aspects in metrology. Working Group 1 of the JCGM is responsible for the Evaluation of Measurement Data series of documents that gives information for evaluating and expressing uncertainty in measurement. This paper compares several methods for evaluating measurement uncertainty that are described in these documents. Emphasis is given to situations where more than one input quantity is measured simultaneously. This leads to an investigation into how these methods perform when these quantities are high-frequency electromagnetic scattering parameters. It is shown that for measurements involving a large number of input quantities, such as those involving microwave scattering parameters, the required number of observations for the approach given in the supplements to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) to work can be prohibitively large.
Measurement Uncertainty: Literature Review and Research Trends
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2012
This paper reviews and analyzes studies concerning measurement uncertainty, examining 114 papers published between 2004 and 2010 in the following international journals: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT , Measurement, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, and Precision Engineering. The papers were classified according to six different approaches identified during the research and six different methods of calculating uncertainty used by the authors of the researched articles. This paper provides a short summary of the state of the art of measurement uncertainty, analyzes the research scenario on the theme, and, finally, brings suggestions on future work based on the analysis.