American hýbris : US Democracy Promotion in Cuba after the Cold War (Part 1) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Obama and US Democracy Promotion in Cuba: New Strategies, Old Goals?
The promotion of democracy in Cuba has been, especially after the Cold War, a distinguishing feature of US foreign policy towards Havana. This article analyzes the evolution in US democracy promotion in Cuba, especially after the latest openings to Cuba (December 2014). Regarding the promotion of democracy on the island, the so-called ‘abandonment of democracy’ in US foreign policy never took place, and this implies a renovated effort to foster regime change – or at least a regime evolution – in Cuba. Obama resisted the virulent and invasive rhetoric of the ‘Bush doctrine’, and introduced some changes in US-Cuba state-to-state relations, while giving a strong relevance to the ‘people-to-people's diplomacy’ and ‘public diplomacy’, still perceived as tools to foster a political change on the island.
After Fidel: The US–Cuba System and the Key Mechanisms of Regime Change
International Politics, 2008
This paper critically examines the different ways that analysts and policy-makers have assessed the future shape of the Cuban regime following the future passing of its long-time revolutionary leader, Fidel Castro. Certainly, from a social science perspective, the future of Cuba after Fidel Castro is open. On the other hand, different, often mutually inconsistent scenarios for regime transition suggest that Cuba's future is over-determined. Both features of social reality-openness and over-determination-create space for visions, ideologies, strategies, and other normative interventions designed to impose a particular cognitive and political order on social reality. While social science should try to include such 'subjective factors' in its objective account, it must maintain a critical distance from the normative closure and hopeful predictions that ideologies and strategies of necessity imply. Based on an analytical distinction between relatively stable systems and rapidly changing systems, this paper identifies and goes on to discuss the major systems of primary relevance for Cuba's future.
The US-Cuba System and the Key Mechanisms of Regime Change After Castro
The proximity of the United States of America is surely perceived as a threat by many Cubans. The regime's propaganda is very active in this respect. Yet there is no need to worry much about such a world power–provided it remains democratic. One has to be apprehensive primarily about totalitarian states. Vaclav Havel, in an exchange of letters with Cuban dissident, Oswaldo Paya 1
The international system has for a long period becomes a centre stage where international politics takes place amongst the various actors within the global arena. To a large extent, international politics is driven by commercial and other strategic interests, and this determines who gets what, when and how? Hence, this study examines the core values of Cuba's foreign policy within a historical and geo-political context which has continued to determine its actions since the Twentieth Century. The study adopts a qualitative and multidisciplinary approach in its analysis of the discourse on Cuba as an actor within the American sub-continent. The study observed that Cuba being a socialist country was in constant friction with the United States of America especially during the better part of the Twentieth Century. In conclusion, Cuba after the ill-health of Fidel Castro, and now under the control of his brother Raul Castro opened its doors to the United States of America during the tenure of President Barack Obama. This change in foreign policy posture is a drastic departure from its twentieth century foreign policy stand.
THERE AND BACK AGAIN: UNITED STATES POLICY TOWARD CUBA IN THE 21ST CENTURY
International Journal of Cuban Studies
The article proposes an approach to the US Cuba policy in the 21st century as public policy. We examine the core variables that drive this Cuba policy and their behaviour during the 21st century. We then identify the central axes of the policy and study their expressions. This allows us to explain the evolution of that policy across three administrations, the first year of a fourth and ten and a half legislative periods. The conclusions of the study provide a better understanding of the making and the nature of that policy. Consequently, it will help to explain the framework that the US Cuba policy creates to thwart the development of Cuba.
U.S.-Cuba Normalization: U.S. Constituencies for Change
IdeAs
La normalización entre Cuba y los Estados Unidos: Grupos interesados estadounidenses para el cambio La normalisation des relations entre les Etats-Unis et Cuba: les groupes d'intérêts américains en marche pour le changement
US-CUBA RELATIONS: A NEW WAVE OF CONFRONTATION_Pérez Benitez S., Eremin A.A.
The article seeks to analyze the role of the changes introduced by the administration of the former president Barack Obama in 2014—2016 into the bilateral US-Cuba relations; and the way in which the new presidential team are to reorganize this direction. The question on the attitude of Donald Trump towards currently existing policies aimed at solving the long-lasting problem with Cuban socialism is especially interesting since new US president has multiple times condemned the old ways practiced by the former establishment, but at the same time has shown readiness to act in a straightforward and confrontational manner. One of contributors of the paper, Santiago Perez Benitez, deputy director of the Center for International Political Studies in Havana, is attempting to provide his professional expertise in granting an insider view from the Cuban side, evaluating the progress made since the 2014 and interpret the notion of the upcoming policy changes in Washington. The importance of the Cuban issue in the framework of US. policy in the Western hemisphere is explained by the fact that a solution in this sphere could help remake a negative image of Pan-American policies that haunts Washington. Cuban issue has also been long considered a possible key for reestablish-ment of trust between the United States and Latin American countries. For president Trump, quite unpopular judging by the polls, Cuban issue also has a potential to earn support of his own constituents, who strongly support lifting the embargo from Cuba. However now after certain decisions of Donald Trump the future of US-Cuban relations seems to get gloomier by the day.
Factors Determining Dialogue: Cuba in the U.S. Strategic Plan for the 21st Century
, will probably be recorded as one of the most significant moments in Cuba's history: the simultaneous announcement by Presidents Raúl Castro and Barack Obama of the initiation of a process aimed at restoring formal diplomatic relations and, in the long term, the gradual normalization of the relations between the two countries. This announcement followed a year and a half of secret negotiations, hinting at the complexity of the numerous issues raised, as well as the work undertaken by a broad spectrum of specialists. The intention of this chapter is to explore many of these issues, including those internal to each country, as well as those bilateral and global in scope. There is little doubt of the importance and extent of the relationship between Cuba and the United States. The bilateral link has played a significant role in the evolution of both countries, so it is relatively easy to find commonalities between the two cultures and identify developments born or enhanced by their interactions. Cuba and the United States have played a large role in each other's political, demographic, and economic processes. Since the 1959 Cuban Revolution, historical processes and relations have developed considerably. The consequences of the Cuban Revolution, particularly the reactions of the United States and the rest of the world, set up a long-lasting conflict between Cuba and the United States, with greater or lesser intensity at various times, extending into the first decade of the 21st century. The onset of a dialogue between the two governments was influenced by a number of deeply interrelated processes. The first set of processes fall within a spectrum of internal and bilateral phenomena, which require a systemic perspective in order to develop an in-depth understanding.