INDONESIA UNDER SUKARNO AND SUHARTO REGIME (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Transition of Post-New Order as a Pattern of the Political System in Indonesia
Artikel Sosial-Politik, 2020
The change in the pattern of the political system in Indonesia is inseparable from the development of democratization and the political turmoil that engulfed it. the most significant change is the shift of authoritarian systems to more democratic systems. This paper will explain the causes of the Reformation Era and their impact on the relationship between the executive and legislative, the relationship between central and local governments, and the democratic process in the region.
Indonesia: from Suharto to democracy?
1997
In recent years there have been some dramatic changes of political leadership in the Asia-Pacific region, and also some dramas without leadership change. In a few countries the demise of well-entrenched political leaders appears imminent; in others regular processes of parliamentary government still prevail. These differing patterns of regime change and regime maintenance raise fundamental questions about the nature of political systems in the region. Specifically, how have some political leaders or leadership groups been able to stay in power for relatively long periods and why have they eventually been displaced? What are the factors associated with the stability or instability of political regimes? What happens when longstanding leaderships change? The Regime Change and Regime Maintenance in Asia and the Pacific Project will address these and other questions from an Asia-Pacific regional perspective and at a broader theoretical level.
Power Shifting and the Challenges of Presidential System in Indonesia (1945-2019)
2021
The dynamics of government system in Indonesia has a long way road since Indonesia secure their independence in 1945. Acco rding to Indonesia constitution, Indonesia adhere the presidential system. Yet, in practice the government system in Indonesia seems more like a Parliamentary system. During the period of 1945-1959, The presidential system in Indonesia doesn’t have any places to operate, entered the guided democracy era, the presidential system obtain its first place. Seeing that, the president success to obtain their power and became a dictator, after Sukarno was remove from the office, Indonesia entered the “new order” regime. This regime just like guided democracy era, the President became center of the power because president was choosed by the parliament and most the fellow comes from the party government. After reformasi in 1998, the presidential system has their own challenges. Considering, the multyparty system felt is not compatible with the presidential system. Hence, ...
Indonesia’s Political and Economic Transition : IPE Analysis of The New Order (1965-1998)
The rapid growth of East Asian economies in the last quarter of the 20-century has often been described as the “East Asian Miracle” (Stiglitz, 1996, p.1). According to Stiglitz (1996) the progress in these developing countries was certainly not a miracle but among others the result of particular policies and government intervention. The purpose of this research paper is to discover what is really behind the “East Asian Miracle” and what are the secrets of, for example, the Indonesian “miracle”?. And to respond to the research question – what have been the impacts of the new order regime in Indonesia?. The methodology of this research is based upon the qualitative content analysis. Furthermore, this paper discusses the political and economic transition that Indonesia went through at the time of President Suharto’s new order from 1965 to 1998. Our research reveals that Suharto obviously established an authoritarian ruling system in the country and used the strong economy and state to justify his dictatorial behaviour and leadership. However, this situation changed insofar as the New Order has evoked major political changes in the post-Suharto Era, while the economic arena remained more or less the same.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Oligarchy and Democracy in Post-Suharto Indonesia
Political Studies Review, 2012
This article presents a systematic review of the literature of oligarchy in Indonesia, which offers a distinctive interpretation of political change in Indonesia. The article argues that this literature is significant in two important ways. First, it invites ongoing rethinking of the ways in which authoritarian regimes fall. In the mainstream literature of democratisation, the fall of authoritarian regimes is often portrayed as the triumph of pro-democratic civil society mobilisation. Whereas many Indonesianists embrace this mainstream account in explaining the fall of the Suharto regime, the oligarchy literature suggests that its fall was driven not so much by the rise of civil society forces as by tensions between Suharto and oligarchs, in which the former was abandoned by the latter. Second, the oligarchy literature also compels a reappraisal of the nature of Indonesia's new democracy. Unlike the mainstream account of democratisation, which holds an optimistic view that the c...