DOC 20230302 WA0017. (original) (raw)
Related papers
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN EDU.RESEARCH
British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 2016
In recent years, educational researchers in particular have started showing more interest and awareness towards ethical guidelines and codes while conducting educational researches. This trend stems from the popularity of the online researches and sophisticated software to crosscheck if the written text is ethically correct or not exactly plagiarized. This has culminated into the authenticity and validity of some of the contemporary styles of research being employed to new research methodologies. This paper is a theoretical analysis of the concept and importance of ethical guidelines and the cases of plagiarism. In addition, certain reasons of plagiarizing tendencies have also been dealt with. Conclusions have been drawn from personal experience, related works and university norms to incorporate an ethical code of conduct in the domain of educational research.
Ethical Issues in Educational Research Management and Practice
Researches in education are conducted to address educational problems and provide solutions that will stimulate effectiveness within the educational sector. Like other disciplines, educational researches must be conducted without issues or bottlenecks that will hinder the integrity of the study or the researchers. This chapter identifies various issues that are currently practised which are unethical. The chapter also provides insights to the aspects that researchers and scholars must focus in order to ensure that unethical issues are avoided when conducting researches. Conclusions and recommendations were made in order to improve the current practices towards global best practices in educational research management.
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to discuss deviance in science due to increasing pressures on researchers and higher education pedagogues to be more effective and efficient in the ‘academic production’. Design/Methodology/Approach: A literature review and reflection. Findings: The authors present a criminological view of deviance in science, discussing the perception of unsuitable scientific and research practices, questionable research practices, ethics and integrity in science, suitable behaviour of researchers in scientific work, and make recommendations for improving the ethics of scientific research in practice. The discussion on deviance in science is based on Merton’s principles of science (1973): the public presentation of knowledge and sharing of ideas, leading to common ownership of scientific discoveries, in which scientists disclaim their intellectual rights to their own insights in exchange for recognition and reputation. An impartial approach and universalism, in which truth is judged by impersonal, universal criteria, rather than based on race, social and economic status, sex, faith, or nationality and other subjective categories is presented and questioned. A non-profit/selfless orientation in which scientists are rewarded for selfless activities, and planned/organized scepticism – that all ideas must be tested, subject to rigorous scientific rules and public disclosure. The authors discuss these principles and connect them with scientific and research practice in Slovenia and abroad. Research limitations/implications: Research results are generalisable as deviance in science occurs in all cultures and have a global impact. Deviance in science is still an under-researched taboo topic and it needs to be discussed. Practical implications: A useful source of information for awareness raising and the improvement of quality of research work.
Ensuring Research Integrity and the Ethical Management of Data
2018
The purpose of this chapter is to ensure research integrity and the ethical management of data in Nigerian tertiary educational institutions. Research as a process concerns three scopes relating to examination/inquiry, finding, and application. In Nigerian universities, only two dimensions of research are in use, observation/inquiry and discovery. Consequently, there is lack of transfer of knowledge to the society through the visible creation of new technology products, processes, or even the development of the existing ones. More often than not, however, when attempts are made by students and lecturers in Nigerian tertiary educational institutions to engage in research conduct, writings, and publications, chains of unethical issues and actions are involved or practiced. It is the consideration of some of such unethical behaviors, their consequences, and how data are managed that the present chapter reveals.
Ethical considerations and their applications to research: a case of the University of Nairobi
2016
Human beings face many challenges especially when they are expected to make certain ethical decisions in life. Sometimes, it is difficult to classify the difference between ethics and morality. This paper examined the meaning of ethics and research ethics in particular; the characteristics or research ethics and the need to embrace research ethics in academic writing. The study was basically library oriented, emphasizing on the bad apple theory and the stressful or imperfect theory. Emphasis was laid on the need to uphold research ethics in institutions of public learning with particular reference to the University of Nairobi where all Masters and PhD candidates’ reports are subjected to the turnitin anti plagiarism software. It is a requirement that they must comply with the 15% and less plagiarized material rule so as to be approved for graduation and inclusion into the research repository. It is also noted that all post graduate students and academic members of staff are suppose...
Responsible Practice of Research: Safeguarding Research Integrity and Publication Ethics
Journal of Education and Research, 2018
In recent years, there has been an outburst of general interest on how we do ‘research’ (Bossi 2010; Lins & Carvalho, 2014) – right from planning to reporting results – and how we disseminate ‘knowledge’. This rise of interest has particularly resulted from the surfeit of news on dishonest practices of research community. Some of the ‘acts of wrongdoing’ or fraudulent research practices that arise in our academic debate comprise the cases such as creation of false data or manipulating data to generate preferred results, cheating or using other’s ideas as own, disclosing improperly the identity of participants, underserved authorship claims, submission to multiple journals, duplicate publications, salami slicing, and predatory publications. In fact, these practices pose a serious question on research integrity. But what actually is ‘integrity’ in research?
Research Ethics and Plagiarism in Today’s World
Journal for research scholars and professionals of English language teaching, 2023
The word, Plagiarism is defined in different ways by different people however, the most appropriate definition is 'Plagiarism can be defined as; to steal 1 and pass off (the ideas or words of others) as one's own'. There is no harm in calling it as as literary theft. Plagiarism can be the use of other's production without crediting the source. There is an aim behind the production of knowledge and that is improving the human situation and discovering the relevant facts. Using unethical means in research leads to violation of this goal. Plagiarism is a serious odd against publishing ethics; this fact is even believed by many scholars actively involved in academics. Recently many campaigns have taken over to regulate the growth of plagiarism in the world, as plagiarism has become a problem. Nowadays the publishing houses are concerned about the increasing plagiarism problem in all types of publications. The reports are giving evidence of the increment of plagiarism time and again in different countries, fields, educational levels and various fields. The aim of this study is to discuss various concepts which are related to plagiarism, aspects related to it, the process and stages involved in plagiarism investigation, and steps taken to tackle plagiarism (in India specifically).
Research integrity and misconduct: a clarification of the concepts
Curationis, 2006
The commercialization of research and the ever changing scientific environment has led scholars to shift the focus from promoting research integrity to regulating misconduct. As a result, most literature explains research integrity in terms of avoidance of misconduct. The purpose of the paper is to stimulate reflection and discussion on research integrity and research misconduct. This article explores the meaning of research integrity and research misconduct, and how research integrity can be promoted to ensure safer research and scholarship. We believe that the discussion can help clarify some hazy areas in the research and publication processes, and appreciate some crucial aspects that they may have seen taken for granted. The purpose of this article is to share with the readers some clarification or analysis of the two concepts namely: research integrity and misconduct. The objectives are: (1) To explore and analyse the concepts of research integrity and research misconduct from ...