Changes in PDGF concentration in surgically treated colorectal carcinoma (original) (raw)
Related papers
Gastrointestinal Tumors, 2018
Background/Aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with high incidence and mortality rates. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a prognostic biomarker for recurrent CRC following curative resection, suffers from low sensitivity, especially in early-stage screening. Intraplatelet angiogenesis regulators (IPAR), such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), have been identified as important regulators of tumor growth in CRC. The aim of this study was to confirm the higher preoperative level of IPAR (VEGF and PDGF) in CRC patients compared to controls and to measure IPAR in CEA-negative CRC patients. Methods: The data and blood of 30 CRC patients and 30 presumably healthy controls were prospectively analyzed and compared. Results: We confirmed elevated preoperative intraplatelet VEGF and PDGF levels in CRC patients compared to controls. Importantly, IPAR were significantly elevated even in CEA-negative CRC patients. Conclusion: Elevated pre...
Relevance of biologic markers in colorectal carcinoma: A comparative study of a broad panel
Cancer, 2002
BACKGROUNDAlthough pathologic stage is currently the main prognostic indicator for patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC), mounting evidence suggests that, in its current form, it is insufficient to predict clinical outcome. To assess biologic markers of primary CRC that may improve clinical staging and provide useful information for the application of novel therapeutic strategies, the authors investigated a panel of markers that included transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α), epithelial growth factor receptor (EGF-R; the protein product of the c-erb B2/HER-2 oncogene), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and angiogenesis, as evaluated by microvessel density (MVD).Although pathologic stage is currently the main prognostic indicator for patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC), mounting evidence suggests that, in its current form, it is insufficient to predict clinical outcome. To assess biologic markers of primary CRC that may improve clinical staging and provide useful information for the application of novel therapeutic strategies, the authors investigated a panel of markers that included transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α), epithelial growth factor receptor (EGF-R; the protein product of the c-erb B2/HER-2 oncogene), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and angiogenesis, as evaluated by microvessel density (MVD).METHODSTwo groups of CRC were studied: 1) surgical samples from patients who achieved a disease free survival of at least 6 years (CRC-M0) and 2) surgical specimens of both primary tumors and synchronous or metachronous liver metastases (CRC-M1).Two groups of CRC were studied: 1) surgical samples from patients who achieved a disease free survival of at least 6 years (CRC-M0) and 2) surgical specimens of both primary tumors and synchronous or metachronous liver metastases (CRC-M1).RESULTSChi-square analysis revealed that expression levels of TGF-α, c-erb B2/HER-2, MMP-2, IGF-II, VEGF, and MVD (but not EGF-R) were significantly higher in CRC-M1 samples compared with CRC-M0 samples (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that TGF-α, IGF-II, and MMP-2 had significantly greater expression in CRC-M1 samples independent of the other variables (including tumor classification, histologic grade, and patient age). If all three markers had ≥ 25% expression, then the probability of developing liver metastasis was 99.5%.Chi-square analysis revealed that expression levels of TGF-α, c-erb B2/HER-2, MMP-2, IGF-II, VEGF, and MVD (but not EGF-R) were significantly higher in CRC-M1 samples compared with CRC-M0 samples (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that TGF-α, IGF-II, and MMP-2 had significantly greater expression in CRC-M1 samples independent of the other variables (including tumor classification, histologic grade, and patient age). If all three markers had ≥ 25% expression, then the probability of developing liver metastasis was 99.5%.CONCLUSIONSBased on the evidence of this study, TGF-α MMP-2, and IGF-II seem suitable candidates for a selective panel of markers designed to provide significant additional information with respect to the current pathologic staging system for patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2002;94:647–57. © 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10277Based on the evidence of this study, TGF-α MMP-2, and IGF-II seem suitable candidates for a selective panel of markers designed to provide significant additional information with respect to the current pathologic staging system for patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2002;94:647–57. © 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10277
European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), 2001
Introduction: Neo-angiogenesis, of great importance for tumour growth and nutrition, is preferentially mediated by the cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which has a direct effect on vascular endothelial cell proliferation and migration. This study was designed to clarify whether VEGF is a suitable tumour marker in sera of patients with a colorectal cancer, and whether VEGF concentrations in sera and tumour tissues are correlated with tumour extension (pTNM) and especially with tumour volume or size. Furthermore, the influence of VEGF levels on patients' prognosis was examined. Methods: VEGF serum concentrations of 122 patients with colorectal cancer and 65 controls were determined with an ELISA kit. Additionally, VEGF concentrations of tumour and normal tissue were measured in 38 patients using the same ELISA. Results: Our results demonstrate that VEGF is not a suitable diagnostic tumour marker in patients with colorectal cancer due to its low sensitivity (36%). However, a combination of the serum tumour markers CEA and VEGF can significantly increase the pre-operative diagnostic sensitivity to 62%. VEGF serum levels differed significantly between patients (mean 438 pg/ml) and controls (mean 203 pg/ml), and also between tumour and normal tissue (984 vs 89 pg/ mg protein). Serum concentration showed a significant correlation to tumour volume and size. Patients with VEGF serum levels greater than cutoff had a poorer prognosis than those less than or equal to cutoff. For this reason VEGF could be used as a predictor of patients' outcome.
The Diagnostic Significance of PDGF, EphA7, CCR5, and CCL5 Levels in Colorectal Cancer
Biomolecules
In this study, we compared the levels of C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5), C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and EphrinA7 (EphA7) in patients with colorectal carcinoma and healthy controls in order to investigate the significance and usability of these potential biomarkers in early diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The study included 70 colorectal carcinoma patients and 40 healthy individuals. The CCR5, CCL5, PDGF, and EphA7 levels were measured using ELISA in blood samples. PDGF-BB, EphA7, CCR5, and CCL5 levels of the patients with colorectal carcinoma were significantly higher compared to the control group (p < 0.001 for each comparison). Our logistic regression analysis (the area under the curve was 0.958) supports the notion that PDGF-BB, EphA7, and CCL5 are potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of colon cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were found to be 87.9%, 87.5%, 92.1%, and 81.4%...
Angiogenesis, 2000
In order to investigate whether the high bFGF serum levels encountered in cancer patients are derived from the tumour, we analysed serum bFGF levels in 18 untreated randomly selected patients with operable colorectal, cervical and ovarian cancer in the blood draining the tumour, i.e., in mesenteric and uterine veins, and compared these with arterial samples. No significantly elevated bFGF levels were found in the veins draining the tumours compared with arterial samples in our patient population. This suggests that, in contrast to what is generally presumed, serum bFGF levels might also be derived from other sources besides the tumour, e.g., platelets.
British Journal of Cancer, 1997
The concentration of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was determined in the serum of 90 untreated and 42 treated metastatic cancer patients, including patients with colorectal, breast, ovarian and renal carcinomas, with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Levels higher than the 95th percentile of the concentrations of a control group, i.e. 7.5 pg ml-' for bFGF and 500 pg ml-1 for VEGF, were identified as 'elevated'. One measurement during follow-up was included into the analysis per patient. For 19 treated patients, consecutive serum samples were analysed. Fifty-seven per cent of all untreated patients had elevated serum levels of one or both angiogenic factors. The fraction of patients with elevated serum levels of bFGF and/or VEGF was similar in the different tumour types. Agreement of bFGF levels and VEGF levels, classified in relation to their respective cut-off values, was present in 67% of all patients. Fifty-eight per cent of the patients with progressive disease during treatment compared with 15% of the patients showing response to treatment (chi-squared test P < 0.05) had elevated bFGF and/or VEGF serum levels. When consecutive serum samples were analysed, two-thirds of the patients showing progressive disease had increasing serum levels of the angiogenic factors compared with less than one-tenth of the patients showing response (chi-squared test P < 0.05). The lack of association between the serum bFGF and VEGF levels and the tumour type may suggest an aspecific host reaction responsible for solid tumour-related angiogenesis. The main determinants of the serum bFGF and VEGF concentration are the progression kinetics of the metastatic carcinomas. aNumber of patients with elevated level(s) / total number (percentage). P-values are related to chi-squared tests.
Clinical Cancer Research an Official Journal of the American Association For Cancer Research, 1999
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a secreted endothelial cell-specific mitogen and permeability factor. Malignant human tumors have been shown to produce VEGF. Elevated levels of VEGF have been detected in sera of cancer patients, but its origin is unsettled. We analyzed VEGF concentrations in serum, plasma, whole blood, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) and platelets in 56 cancer patients and 52 healthy controls using ELISA. The VEGF concentrations in the lysed whole blood samples [blood VEGF (B-VEGF)] were higher in cancer patients than in healthy controls (median, 464 versus 298 pg/ml; P < 0.0001). The highest B-VEGF values were found in disseminated cancer. In cancer patients, a high B-VEGF concentration was associated with a high peripheral blood leukocyte count (P ؍ 0.0012) and platelet count (P ؍ 0.019). In healthy individuals, a high B-VEGF was associated with a high leukocyte count (P ؍ 0.0001) but not with the platelet count (P > 0.1). The cancer patients regularly had higher B-VEGF concentrations than healthy individuals with comparable leukocyte or platelet counts. The VEGF content of isolated PBMNCs and platelets was severalfold higher in cancer patients than in healthy controls (median, 10.6 versus 0.9 pg per 10 6 PBMNCs, and median, 1.6 versus 0.5 pg per 10 6 platelets; P < 0.0001 and P ؍ 0.0008, respectively). Serum VEGF and B-VEGF correlated strongly (P < 0.0001). Very little or no VEGF was found in the plasma. The results indicate that VEGF in the bloodstream is transported by blood cells, including leukocytes and platelets. The blood cells of cancer patients contain greatly elevated amounts of this major angiogenic growth factor, and this reservoir of VEGF may have a role in tumor angiogenesis and metastasis formation. VEGF in serum samples originates from blood cells, and the use of VEGF of whole blood or of isolated blood cells may improve the clinical value of VEGF measurements.
BMC Cancer, 2010
Background: Angiogenesis is a multistep process in which many growth factors and cytokines have an essential role. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent angiogenic agent that acts as a specific mitogen for vascular endothelial cells through specific cell surface receptors. The interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway is another mechanism linking angiogenesis to malignancy. C-reactive protein (CRP), a representative marker for inflammation, is known for its association with disease progression in many cancer types. The aim of this study was to determine preoperative serum levels of VEGF, IL-6, and CRP in colorectal carcinoma, and to correlate them with disease status and prognosis. Methods: A 132 of 143 patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study. 11 patients with resection margin positive were excluded. Factors considered in analysis of the relationship between VEGF, IL-6, and CRP and histological findings. Patient prognosis was investigated. Serum levels of VEGF and IL-6 were assessed using Enzyme-Linked Immuno-Sorbent Assay (ELISA), and CRP was measured using immunoturbidimetry. Results: Median follow-up duration was 18.53 months (range 0.73-43.17 months) and median age of the patients was 62 years (range, 26-83 years). Mean and median levels of VEGF and CRP in colorectal cancer were significantly higher than in the normal control group; 608 vs. 334 pg/mL and 528 (range 122-3242) vs. 312 (range 16-1121) (p < 0.001); 1.05 mg/dL vs. 0.43 mg/dL and 0.22 (range 0.00-18.40) vs. 0.07 (range 0.02-6.94) (p = 0.002), respectively. However mean and median level of IL-6 in patients were not significantly higher than in control; 14.33 pg/mL vs. 5.65 pg/mL and 6.00 (range 1.02-139.17) vs. 5.30 (4.50-13.78) (p = 0.327). Although IL-6 and CRP levels were not correlated with other pathological findings, VEGF level was significantly correlated with tumor size (p = 0.012) and CEA (p = 0.038). When we established the cutoff value for VEGF (825 pg/mL), IL-6 (8.09 pg/mL), and CRP (0.51 mg/dL) by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, we noted that high VEGF levels tended to reduce overall survival (p = 0.053), but not significantly. However, IL-6 and CRP demonstrated no significance with regard to disease free survival (p = 0.531, p = 0.701, respectively) and overall survival (p = 0.563, p = 0.572, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that VEGF (p = 0.032), CEA (p = 0.012), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002), and TNM stage (p = 0.025) were independently associated with overall survival. Conclusions: Preoperative serum VEGF and CRP level increased in colorectal cancer patients. High VEGF level has been proposed as a poor prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer.