The Factors of the Voting Equation: An Empirical Analysis (original) (raw)
Related papers
Theoretical Approaches to the Study of Voting Behaviour: A Comparative Analysis
sjesr, 2020
The study of voting behavior is a sub-field of Political Science. Voting represents an important aspect of public participation in a democratic system. Keeping in view the importance of voting behavior in a democratic dispensation, social scientists have paid much attention to its determinants. At least three kinds of theoretical models can be discerned in the works of social scientists: a sociological model, a psycho-social model, and a rational choice model. The focus of the sociological model is on social factors, the psychosocial model focuses on psychological or political factors, while the rational choice model emphasizes economic factors. The main aim of the paper is to present a brief overview of these three kinds of models comparatively.
Theoretical models of voting behaviour 1
This article reviews the main theoretical models that explain the electoral behavior -sociological model of voting behavior, psychosocial model of voting behavior and rational choice theory -, stressing the continuity and theoretical complementarity between them. It also proposes a reconceptualization of the concept of partisanship in order to integrate all relevant contributions of the three main models of voting behavior in a holistic approach to electoral behavior.
Determinants of voter participation in Latin American referendums
Política y Sociedad, 2022
Voter turnout in regular parliamentary or presidential elections is a very frequent topic, mainly in the recent debate about its decline. This article works with several theories explaining variations in voter turnout that are subsequently applied on referendums in Latin America. Referendums as one of the main pillars of direct democracy are not, in this regard, sufficiently scientifically explored topic. In this point of view, the region of Latin America is an ideal environment for research of the given subject, because there are many cases of direct democracy applications in the institutional configuration as well as in practice. Voter turnout in referendums is set into a comparative perspective using regression models that allow the researcher to monitor possible correlations and control explaining values. The analysis employs aggregate data from various statistical databases (e. g. V-Dem, Polity IV, World Bank) as well as secondary data from available comparative literature foc...
The impact of turnout on electoral choices: an econometric analysis of the French case
Electoral Studies, 2000
The rational choice theory of abstention and turnout has focused on the "paradox of [not] voting". Because of this focalization, other important problems have been left out, notably the possibility that electoral results are dependent on the number and characteristics of those who decide to vote. This question can be dealt with only within the framework of a simultaneous equation model. Such a model is built and estimated on French data. The results are clear. Not only is interdependence strong, but it also depends on the partisan affiliation of the incumbent (increasing/decreasing participation benefits/hurts the left-wing coalition). The empirical results also confirm that voting is not just an instrumental activity but also a means for expressive and signaling actions. : S 0 2 6 1 -3 7 9 4 ( 99 )0 0 0 5 8 -X
Los factores de la ecuación del voto: un análisis empírico
Reis Revista Espanola De Investigaciones Sociologicas, 2013
The literature on the phenomenon of abstention has shown that participation is determined by certain individual and contextual factors. However, the empirical studies conducted using rational choice theory have not taken these contributions into account. Some authors, more focused on understanding the factors that should be included in the voting equation, have concluded that citizens vote because they overestimate the value of their vote. But is this overestimation random? What does it depend on? The aim of this study, based on the 2008 post-election survey data of the Spanish Centre for Sociological Research (CIS), is to turn the traditional factors of the instrumental voter equation into dependent variables, thereby discovering some of their determinants. The results show that the distribution of these factors is not random and that it does not always match what was predicted.
Abstentionism, Blank Vote and Invalid Ballot Papers. Evidences from Brazil and E.U.
Abstentionism, blank vote and invalid ballots are electoral phenomena that are statistically growing in many Countries but don´t receive much attention and when they do, they are usually treated with a strong negative bias. This article explore this issue and it is divided in three part: In the first part we analyze how the literature currently defines and treats abstentionism, blank vote and invalid ballot. We find out they are usually treated as a single and unique “non-vote area” and we propose a different approach based in a more detailed view, combining methodological individualism and imperfect rationality. In the second part we show the empirical relevance of this three types of electoral outcomes in EU parliamentary elections and in Brazilian presidential ones. In the last part, we notice a negative bias toward these electoral behaviors to which we oppose a different point of view. In this line, at the end, we propose some possible changes in electoral systems in order to better intercept voters will.
Political Science Research and Methods, 2018
Invalid voting and absenteeism are alternative sources of abstention under compulsory voting. Previous research failed to systematically study the mechanisms behind each form of non-voting and the relationships between them. We develop an analytical framework and an empirical strategy to jointly examine invalid voting and absenteeism in Brazil, the world’s largest democracy with mandatory voting. Using Bayesian inferential methods and analyzing both individual and district-level data, we show that less educated and politically knowledgeable citizens are less likely to vote and, when they do, they are typically unable to successfully complete their ballot. Unlike absenteeism, invalid voting also has a political dimension reflecting voters’ disenchantment with elections and democratic performance. Both sources of abstention coexist and, together, undermine electoral participation.
Individual characteristics, institutional incentives and electoral abstention in Western Europe
European Journal of Political Research, 2002
Abstract. This article examines the interaction between individual characteristics and institutional incentives in non–voting, with a special focus on the interaction between these two types of explanatory variables. The analysis of survey and contextual data for parliamentary elections in 15 Western European countries shows that the effect of individual resources and motivations on abstention is not constant across different countries. Conversely, the effect of institutional incentives (compulsory voting, voting facilities, electoral thresholds of representation and preference expression) on non–voting depends on the elector's level of resources and motivations. One of the four institutional incentives considered has even opposite effects for citizens with different individual characteristics. The analysis also shows that when analysing interactions it is fundamental to distinguish between magnitudes and consequences of the effects of explanatory variables. This has important implications for the interpretation of the results of logistic regression analysis.
Rational Choice Theory and Voter Turnout: Models and Problems of a D Term
Thammasat Review, 19(2), 2016
Turnout studies tackle the question, "Why do some people vote while others do not?" Anthony Downs' An Economic Theory of Democracy was the first systematic attempt coping with turnout puzzles by exploiting rational choice theory (RCT). A D term or a civic duty, an important concept used by Downs, explains that people vote only if they care about democracy. There are two important questions regarding voter turnout: (1) Does RCT explain voter turnout successfully? (2) Does adding a D term mean that we no longer have a rational choice model? This paper aims to deal with the latter question only, and my main argument is that a D term makes RCT impossible because while RCT is the conception of investment, the D term is the conception of consumption. I am interested in question (2) only, therefore, even though my answer is that a D term makes RCT impossible, this does not mean that I see that RCT is successful in explaining voter turnout; in contrast, I think it is not. Apart from the discussion of a D term, I also review some RCT models which try to avoid the difficulties raised by a D term. In terms of application, I suggest that different political systems, cultures, history, and so on need different characteristics of RCT, so researchers should be aware of the limits of RCT.