Perspectives on Comparative Law and Jurisprudence, Preface (original) (raw)

The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law

Cambridge University Press eBooks, 2024

This chapter introduces the aims and scope of this handbook. In this handbook, we seek to showcase the diverse perspectives offered by contributors from all over the world concerning topics of comparative law. We begin by outlining the proposition that one's culture and identity shape what we do and how we think, but we also suggest that understanding law in a global context requires us to transcend a radical scepticism about the comparative law enterprise and also avoid exclusionary 'identity politics'. We proceed by explaining the structure of the handbook and summarising the key contents of each chapter in the handbook.

Introduction: The Philosophies of Comparative Law

Critical Analysis of Law, 2021

This introductory essay outlines the Special Issue's aims and contents. After having offered a general overview of the development and state of comparative law as a discipline, it introduces the reader to the issue's articles. The issue features articles by leading scholars and emerging researchers that make significant contributions to the academic debate on the current status and future directions of comparative legal analysis and methodologies of research. More particularly, combining theoretically-oriented essays with empirical accounts of socio-cultural, pluralist dynamics of ordering from the Global South (i.e., Latin America) and Asia (i.e., Japan), it takes a further step towards molding a body of interdisciplinary, pluralist, critical, and contextual comparative legal scholarship by (a) critically exploring what "philosophies" have been informing and shaping its development over the past few decades, and (b) suggesting possible new directions of thought for an age, such as ours, characterized by increasing regulatory density and complexity, and geopolitical instability. It is by meaningfully embracing this critical, interdisciplinary, and pluralist spirit that this Special Issue moves away from reductionist understandings of the comparative enterprise and speaks of "philosophies" of comparative law.