Beyond grantmaking: Philanthropic foundations as agents of change and institutional entrepreneurs (Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2014) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Institutional Isomorphism the Rise of a Hybrid Model in Education Philanthropy
While private foundation involvement in education has expanded significantly over the past three decades, their role and impact education policy has been largely under scrutinized. In particular, how foundations think about their impact and that of their grants, how they approach grantmaking in order to achieve their goals, and the impact such thinking has on other foundations across the philanthropic sector is largely unexplored. In this paper, I draw upon a theoretical framework informed by institutional isomorphism (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983) to analyze the grantmaking practices of traditional and strategic philanthropies, with particular attention to areas of increasing convergence such as the utilization of measurable outcomes and metrics. Drawing from interviews with foundation officers at six philanthropies and grant data from Foundation Directory Online, I find that while differences remain between traditional and strategic philanthropies, a new "hybrid philanthropy" model is emerging that blends outcomesoriented and field-oriented approaches to grantmaking. I also find that the homogenization of practices across foundations and the influence of larger policy trends focused on data-driven decisionmaking may be leading foundations to exercise what might be termed "high stakes grantmaking." To the extent that this might conflict with what is good for students and communities, and the goals of democratic decision making in education policy more broadly, additional research is needed.
education policy analysis archives
Researchers have demonstrated how venture philanthropic networks advance the growth of charter schools underpinned by market tenets. However, little remains known about how progressive charter schools mobilize financial support when most funding from philanthropic networks flows to market-oriented charters. This qualitative study examines how three progressive charter schools in New York City mobilized financial support, the extent to which charters’ financial supporters operated in a networked context, and the extent to which charters’ resource mobilization activities reflected their founding progressive tenets. Findings reveal that the focal charters incorporated market logic when cultivating financial support networks. In doing so, schools endeavored to secure their own resource advantages while reinforcing resource inequities across New York City’s unequal educational landscape, hence undermining the equity and community responsibility dimensions of their progressive missions.
The Expanding Role of Philanthropy in Education Politics
Philanthropic involvement in education politics has become bolder and more visible. Have foundations changed funding strategies to enhance their political influence? Using data from 2000, 2005, and 2010, we investigate giving patterns among the 15 largest education foundations. Our analyses show growing support for national-level advocacy organizations. Furthermore, we find that foundations increasingly fund organizations that operate as “jurisdictional challengers” by competing with traditional public sector institutions. We apply social network analysis to demonstrate the growing prevalence of convergent grant-making—multiple foundations supporting the same organizations. These results suggest that a sector once criticized for not leveraging its investments now increasingly seeks to maximize its impact by supporting alternative providers, investing concurrently, and supporting grantees to engage in policy debates.
Lectures, 2017
In her book Policy Patrons. Philanthropy, Education Reform, and the Politics of Influence, Megan Tompkins-Stange, assistant professor at the Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan, examines the recent commitment of philanthropic foundations to educational policy reform in the United States. She analyzes how these organizations use the returns from the investment of their endowment on the financial markets to finance other organizations, research and various activities related to the advancement of their mission (lobbying, coalition building, media presence, etc.). By providing access to the decision- making and communication processes as well as the investment strategies of four of the twenty largest foundations working in the US education field—Ford Foundation, W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation—the author makes an original contribution to the age-old debate about the role which philanthropic foundations can play in public policy reform in a liberal democracy. Rather than starting with a political- philosophical discussion on the expected role of the private sector in solving a public problem, the author begins with a field investigation to determine precisely how these foundations deploy their influence.
Foundations as honest brokers between market, state and nonprofits through building social capital
European Management Journal, 2010
The ability of foundations to build social capital has been considered insufficiently. Using a case study design describing a successful project with a network structure, this study presents abilities and characteristics of foundations that allow them to develop networks, norms, and trust, the core components of social capital. Based on 20 interviews, the findings come from a project of the Eberhard von Kuenheim Foundation that saved a traditional glass manufactory by involving 60 different partners, including former employees, the employment office and other state authorities, nonprofits and investors, as well as local politicians. This paper contributes to a better understanding of the role of foundations as ''honest brokers'' that allows them to mediate between other social actors. ª