China’s Normative Power in Central and Eastern Europe: ‘16/17 + 1’ Cooperation as a Tale of Unfulfilled Expectations (original) (raw)
Related papers
Who or what is a normative power? In response to this query the article suggests that normative powers are those actors that are recognized as such by others. This qualifies Ian Manners’s oft-quoted proposition that normative powers are only those actors that have the ability to ‘shape what can be “normal” in international life’. The proposition is that the definitions of the ‘normal’ are not merely undertaken by normative power, but they emerge in the context of its interaction with others. Recognition, in this setting, is indicated by the specific reactions of target states. In this respect, the issue is not merely about being and becoming a normative power, but also about being recognized as one by others. The article details this proposition through a parallel assessment of normative power Europe and normative power China. The intention of such comparison is to elicit the key elements of normative power in global life.
The Unexpected Consequences of China’s Cooperation with Central and Eastern Europe
International Studies, 2019
The Central and East European (CEE) region is often overlooked in the conversations on contemporary geopolitics. Yet, owing to China’s growing relations in the CEE countries, the region has been subject to increasing international attention. By process tracing the development of the ‘17 + 1’ mechanism, this article offers a brief overview of Sino-CEE relations. Situated within the broader Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the ‘17 + 1’ has provided a unique regional arrangement for extending Chinese influence in the CEE countries. This article explores whether there is something else than the instrumental economic reasoning for the willingness of CEE countries to partner with China. The analysis detects three distinct (and not always complementary) strategic narratives, motivating the participation of CEE states in the ‘17 + 1’ mechanism. The study concludes with an enquiry on China’s preparedness to respond to such identity geopolitics not only in the CEE region but also throughout th...
China and the Frustrated Region: Central and Eastern Europe’s Repeating Troubles with Great Powers
China Report, 2020
Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) had few historical opportunities to interact with China, but with the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the 16+1 platform, that changed dramatically in recent years. The article discusses recent development in the China-CEE relations with the aim of explaining why the CEE countries became excited about China initially, but also why this excitement led prevailingly to disappointment. It will be argued that the frustration with the EU in the aftermath of the 2008 crisis created an environment in which China was for a moment perceived as a promising alternative. A few years into the new diplomatic initiatives, however, most of the CEE countries started to be unsatisfied with the lack of economic results. Eventually, the article will assess the implications of the new era of China-CEE relations for the EU affairs and broader Chinese relations with the developing world. The CEE region is in a specific position vis-à-vis China, for it is structurally in between the developed and the developing world. Moreover, the EU membership adds some critical features which make Chinese offer less applicable and appealing.
China's Engagement in Central and Eastern Europe: Regional Diplomacy in Pursuit of China's Interests
2015
A leading experts on China, David Shambaugh, discusses the nature of the global engagement of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in his most recent book. In his view, Chinese diplomacy takes a kind of lowest-common-denominator approach in world affairs: it habitually takes the safest and least controversial position waiting first for other governments to reveal their position and only then revealing its own. There is a single exception to this rule - when China deals with an issue concerning its narrow self-interests, such as Tibet, Taiwan, Xinjiang, human rights and China's maritime territorial claims.1Shambaugh views this approach as either being down to a conscious decision by China or its distinct inability to influence international affairs. In this, China is probably following the "maintaining a low profile in foreign relations" strategy that originated when China started modernizing under Deng Xiaoping. Alternati...
China’s bid for international leadership in Central and Eastern Europe: role conflict and policy responsesInternational Relations, 2022
China and Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) have intensified their cooperation over the past decade or so. Despite some modest progress, this cooperation has performed below the expectations of the CEECs in general, and, even more so, generated negative feedback and implications more widely. This study is motivated by the puzzle over why there are widening discrepancies between the two sides after initially positive expectations. Informed by the role theory of international relations, this paper mainly argues that there is an intrarole conflict between China’s perception of its international leadership role and the corresponding role expectations of China held by the CEECs. This framework is empirically assessed on the 17 + 1 cooperation, through which China strives to forge a leadership role for itself in relation to the CEECs. Amid generally low expectations of China’s leadership role, three general patterns of responses can be identified among the CEECs, including th...
Shanghaied into cooperation: Framing China's Socialization of Central Asia
This article offers a much-needed conceptual analysis of China’s emerging international agency in Central Asia. In particular it engages with the apparent susceptibility of Central Asian states to China’s normative power. The contention is that the emphasis on the dynamics of international socialization offers a relevant framework for evaluating Beijing’s capacity to engage regional states. By relying on its normative power, China has gradually attracted Central Asia into its sphere of influence through the promotion of various initiatives for regional cooperation consolidated in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Such conceptualization of Beijing’s conditioning propensity reflects upon China’s international role(s) in the region.
Journal of Contemporary China , 2018
Development of ‘16 + 1’ framework substantially depends on how Central and Eastern European countries understand their fast-evolving relationship with China. This article investigates and analyses related perceptions and discusses their implications for ‘16 + 1’. Focusing on the Sino-Serbian relationship, the study reveals that the understanding of China and its growing involvement in the region oscillates between the extremes, yet that both positive and negative evaluations are not supported by the available empirical evidence and informed by a proper understanding of the context within which the relationship takes place. This is likely to result in a sense of disillusionment, as well as heightened concerns about the relationship with China, casting shadow over the prospects of the China-CEE relations.
China and Eurasia Rethinking Cooperation and Contradictions in the Era of Changing World Order
Routledge, 2021
This book facilitates exchanges between scholars and researchers from around the world on China– Eurasia relations. Comparing perspectives and methodologies, it promotes interdisciplinary dialogue on China’s pivot towards Eurasia, the Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s cooperation and arguments with India, the EU, the Western Balkans and the South Caucasus states and the Sino– Russian struggle for multipolarity and multilateralism in Eurasia. It also researches digitalization processes in Eurasia, focuses notably on China's Digital Silk Road, and the Digital Agenda of the Eurasian Economic Union. Multipolarity without multilateralism is a dangerous mix. Great power competitions will remain. In the Asian regional system more multilateral cushions have to be developed. Scholars from different nations including China, India, Russia, Austria, Armenia, Georgia, United Arab Emirates, and Montenegro introduce their own, independent research, making recommendations on the developments in relations, and demonstrating that through joint discussions it is possible to find ways for cooperation and for ensuring peaceful coexistence. The book will appeal to policymakers and scholars and students in Chinese, Eurasian International and Oriental Studies.
China in Central and Eastern Europe: the unintended effects of identity narratives
Asia Europe Journal, 2019
The Central and East European (CEE) part of the Eurasian landmass is often overlooked in the conversations on contemporary geopolitics. Yet, owing to China's relations with the CEE countries, the region has been subject to growing strategic attention. This article offers a brief overview of the history of this relationship by focusing on the "17+1" mechanism. Nestled within the broader Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the "17+1" has provided a unique regional arrangement for extending Chinese influence in the sixteen CEE countries. The article inquires whether there is something else than the instrumental economic reasoning for the willingness of CEE countries to partner with China. The analysis detects three distinct strategic narratives motivating the participation of CEE states in the "17+1" mechanism. The study concludes with an enquiry on China's preparedness to respond to such identity geopolitics not only in the CEE region, but throughout the vast expanse covered by the BRI initiative.
East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures, 2022
The study examines Czech–China relations in the 2010s within the theoretical framework of relationalism, through the prism of which Czech ruling and financial elites have been trying to gain economic benefits from the partnership with China. These efforts are examined on several, often overlapping, levels, including elite, national and local. On the other side of the relational spectrum, in the process of improving ties with the Czech ruling elites, Prague was selected as the center of European operations of the powerful—at least until recently—CEFC China Energy conglomerate. This nominally private company, now taken over by the state-owned CITIC, attributed its operations not only to economic benefits but also as intended to strengthen friendly relations between the two countries: that is, as part of China’s economic statecraft. Therefore, the practice and effects of the Czech efforts are examined in the relational context of Beijing’s attempts to secure the support of the Czech ruling elites for China’s core interests: Tibet, Taiwan, and (implicitly) Huawei.