Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth: The Case of Middle Income Developing Countries (original) (raw)
Related papers
Economic Growth: Testing the hypothesis of Absolute and Conditional Convergence
One of the fundamental predictions of the Solow-Swan growth model is convergence across countries, implying that the regions or countries associated with initial lower level of capital accumulation tends to grow faster than those with higher level of capital accumulation (Absolute Convergence). This hypothesis is not practically evident in world economic growth of today because owing to the underlying differences in the nature of the economies such as technological advancement, disparity in level of savings, education, etc. If those differences are accounted for, this will lead to the hypothesis of Conditional Convergence, which is the closest to the reality. Having selected randomly, 22 countries among developed and 50 countries among less developed countries and applying the Pooled Least Squares method, I put both the hypotheses of Absolute and Conditional Convergence to the test. My main findings show that there was absolute convergence for homogeneous countries (developed countries) and conditional convergence for heterogeneous countries (developed countries and less developed countries combined together).
Human Capital and the Convergence Process Among Countries
Review of Development Economics, 2008
This paper examines the convergence process across countries for the period 1980-2000, giving special attention to the role of human capital as a conditioning factor. The originality of the study is in the use of new proxies for human capital, such as publications and patents ratio and the patents/articles ratio which reflect the efficiency of the scientific work, in contrast to the quantitative measures usually used in the growth literature. The analysis suggests that: (i) convergence is conditional on structural factors, population growth, human and physical capital; (ii) the new proxies of human capital control fairly well the different steadystates among countries; (iii) the different levels of human capital affect countries differently, according to their levels of development. Higher levels of human capital are suitable to differentiate the convergence process among developed countries, and basic or intermediate levels are more suitable to differentiate convergence among the less developed countries.
Appropriate IPRs, Human Capital Composition and Economic Growth
Documents de Treball (IREA), 2009
With this paper we analyze the growth dynamics of a technology diffusion model in which we allow the IPRs regimes in di¤erent countries to be endogenously defined by their development stage, human capital composition and institutional quality. The predictions of the model mimic the existence of a U-shaped impact of IPRs enforcement on economic growth which has been recently highlighted in various empirical studies. At initial stages of development the follower economy can both imitate and raise the protection of property rights up to a de ned threshold level. Above this level, increasing the protection of IPRs harms eco- nomic growth. Also, we are able to show that once a sufficient development stage is reached, the follower switches to innovation by fully enforcing IPRs protection. Other scenarios, such as a premature increase in the enforcement of IPRs or a switch from imitation to innovation at early stages of development of the followers are found to be sub-optimal.
Convergence or confusion? A study of world economic growth
Economics Bulletin, 2020
This paper takes a closer look at the typical growth convergence regression of Barro (1991), Mankiw, Romer and Weil (1992), Sala-i-Martin (1996), and others. By interpreting the two components of the regression coefi¬ cient separately, i.e. the correlation coefficient and the ratio of standard deviations, we distinguish between "time-series" convergence and "cross-section" convergence, and consequently the relationship between I²âˆ’ and Iƒâˆ’convergence. And, using data from the latest Penn World Table database (version 9.1), we investigate the convergence or the lack-of-convergence in samples of countries representing the “World†, OECD and Sub-Saharan Africa. The implications of this study for the neoclassical growth model are also discussed.
NBER WORKING PAPERS SERIES A CONTRIBUTION TO THE EMPIRICS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH
This paper examines whether the Solow growth model is consistent with the international variation in the standard of living. It shows that an augmented Solow model that includes accumulation of human as well as physical capital provides an excellent description of the cross-country data. The model explains about 80 percent of the international variation in income per capita, and the estimated influences of physical-capital accumulation, human-capital accumulation, and population growth confirm the model's predictions. The paper also examines the implications of the Solow model for convergence in standards of living--that is, for whether poor countries tend to grow faster than rich countries. The evidence indicates that, holding population growth and capital accumulation constant, countries converge at about the rate the augmented Solow model predicts.
ABSTRACT The main aim of this research is to examine the economic growth of developing and developed countries and see if those categories will converge economically by comparing the per capita growth models for the developed with developing countries. To realize this catch up event, assume that the economic growth rates in developing countries are on average higher than those in developed countries as most of the developing countries still having in abundance natural resources and many economic areas to be exploited. We compare the economic growth of Rwanda and Japan which are developing and developed countries respectively, having a similar history leading them to the catastrophic fall down of their national economies (for the Rwanda civil war and the genocide of 1994 and for Japan, the second World War and the effects of the atomic bombs launched at Nagasaki and Hiroshima in 1945). We use GDP per capita(Y1) in the model depending on Consumption (X1), Gross capital formation(X2), Exports of goods and services(X3) and imports of goods and services (X4) from 1970 to 2013). By Johansen Cointegration approach, we verify the long run correlation and goodness of the models. Findings reveal that all independents variables in the study contribute significantly to the per capita of those countries, but the potentiality of each counties category are different as for the developing countries the most contributors is a negative contributor to per capita where in the developed countries the most contributor is the positive one. The study concludes that, however GDP per capita growth rate in developing countries is on average higher than those in developed countries considering their opportunities, it can take a long time for poor countries to catch up with the rich even never as those poor countries also will arrive at a point where their economy will growth at a low rate as the developed countries. We recommend to developing countries, to reduce the importation of goods and services as a said negative contributor to the per capita, encourage local products consumption, empowerment of the Gross capital formation to encourage production beyond domestic consumption for all products and expand the growth of other sectors that are useful in accelerating the economy. For developed countries, however the most contributor is a positive to the per capita, this most contributor is the consumption, this imply that they consume a greatest part of their production. We recommend to the developed countries, to reduce the consumption and exports goods at low prices. Those will promote the situation convergence. Otherwise it can’t be realized soon with the normal situation. Key words: Gross Domestic Product per capita, economic growth, Consumption, Gross capital formation, Exports of goods and services and imports of goods and services.
Economic Growth and Development
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014
The historical growth record is reviewed and growth is shown to have resulted in divergence between the incomes of fast growing rich economies and slower growing poorer economies. Supply-led, neoclassical growth is then contrasted with demand-led, Keynesian growth. Three Keynesian growth theories (Harrodian, Kaleckian, and Kaldorian) are outlined and shown to differ according to whether investment spending or export demand is the key "driver" of demand formation and growth. The properties of Keynesian growth are then identified and discussed. These include the relationship between saving behaviour and growth, the effects of income redistribution on growth, the relationship between technical progress and growth, and the interaction of supply and demand in the growth process.