Qualitative research and public policy: The challenges of relevance and trustworthiness (original) (raw)
Related papers
More than meets the eye: the contribution of qualitative research to evidence-based policy-making
Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2014
The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Against a background of debate between postfoundational thought and scientific fundamentalism, this paper asks how qualitative researchers may respond to questions regarding the generalisability of their research and the significance of the specific, local and/or subjective for addressing social problems. It troubles the assumption that research provides useful evidence for educational policy only when it is large scale, quantitative and longitudinal. These issues are investigated through exemplar qualitative case study research on experiments in schooling. There is significance for policy-making in relating specific experiences to wider policy concerns or utilising social theory to understand how individual experiences are structured in relation to public issues. Undertaking this work is particularly important in the current climate of increased personal responsibility.
American Journal of Qualitative Research, 2024
This essay reviews classic works on the philosophy of science and contemporary pedagogical guides to scientific inquiry in order to present a discussion of the three logics that underlie qualitative research in political science. The first logic, epistemology, relates to the essence of research as a scientific endeavor and is framed as a debate between positivist and interpretivist orientations within the discipline of political science. The second logic, ontology, relates to the approach that research takes to investigating the empirical world and is framed as a debate between positivist qualitative and quantitative orientations, which together constitute the vast majority of mainstream researchers within the discipline. The third logic, methodology, relates to the means by which research aspires to reach its scientific ends and is framed as a debate among positivist qualitative orientations. Additionally, the essay discusses the present state of qualitative research in the discipline of political science, reviews the various ways in which qualitative research is defined in the relevant literature, addresses the limitations and trade-offs that are inherently associated with the aforementioned logics of qualitative research, explores multimethod approaches to remedying these issues, and proposes avenues for acquiring further information on the topics discussed.
Can Qualitative Researchers Answer Policymakers’ What-Works Question?
Qualitative Inquiry, 2012
The article asks whether constructivist qualitative researchers have anything to offer policymakers who expect researchers to tell them what works. The first part of the article addresses philosophical objections to characterizing the social world in cause/effect terms. Specifically, it considers whether it is legitimate for qualitative researchers who claim to be employing a constructivist research paradigm to even attempt to provide the sort of simplified causal explanations that policy makers normally expect. The second part of the article takes a more empirical tack by focusing on three recent evaluation studies in which funders wanted to learn what types of programs they should support to produce desired results. The underlying question in this part of the article is pragmatic: Even if there is no paradigmatic prohibition against attempting to answer policymakers’ what-works question, are constructivist qualitative researchers able to answer policymakers’ bottom-line question i...
A qualitative method refers to the way of studying the social and political world that seeks to understand the meaning underlying an intention, action, object or phenomenon. In Political Science research, qualitative methods are usually contrasted with quantitative methods, which typically deal with large amount of data, using surveys and statistical methods, with the aim of establishing causal relationships between social phenomena. Given such differences, qualitative and quantitative methods have usually been conceived as two mutually exclusive modes of generating and analysing data. In this chapter, we challenge these assumptions, but argue that the most important distinction between different methods of analyses relates to the ontological and epistemological position they rely on, rather than the type of data they seek to analysis. We also outline examples of the use of qualitative methods in Political Science research to show that such methods cannot be associated with an 'anything goes approach'
Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research, 2003
How can qualitative research inform policy implementation? This article hopes to shed some light on this complex yet relevant issue and locates this inquiry in a transitional South African context. I intend to qualitatively reveal the local teacher voice, in times of transition and show how such knowledge could contribute to policy implementation. That said, I argue that although teachers play an important role in our education system, more often than not, the teacher voice is a silent voice, which implies that local knowledge for policy implementation might be underplayed, discounted or simply ignored. First, I briefly discuss the development of qualitative research in policy-oriented work. Second, I work from an interpretive perspective to illuminate teacher voice as local knowledge, discussing resistant behaviour and the responses of experienced teachers. Finally, I conclude how qualitative research offers substance and deep nuanced understandings of the complexities at the levels of policy implementation.
Qualitative Research Approaches in Social Sciences
MKSES Publication, 2023
This article presents a comprehensive exploration of commonly utilized qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Covering essential methodologies such as ethnography, phenomenology, grounded theory, case study, content analysis, and ethnomethodology, the article delves into their ontological and epistemological foundations, objectives, applications, and specific approaches to sampling, data collection, and analysis. The discussion navigates the constructivist and interpretive paradigms that underlie these methods, emphasizing the subjective understanding of human behaviour within socially constructed realities. Each method's unique objectives are delineated, from unravelling social order construction in ethnography to exploring individual lived experiences in phenomenology and developing theories grounded in qualitative data in grounded theory. The article highlights the practical application of these methods in social science. Emphasizing the flexibility and purposive nature of sampling, coupled with iterative data analysis techniques, the article underscores the common thread uniting these approaches. It emphasizes the profound significance of these qualitative methods in unravelling intricate social phenomena that defy easy quantification, ultimately contributing to a nuanced understanding of the dynamic facets of the human condition in the field of social research.
Asian Social Science, 2013
There are explicit methodological tensions among researchers in the qualitative and quantitative tracks of social science research. In this paper, (1) we highlight the tensions by making a comparison of the two traditions in terms of their ontological and epistemological paradigms, strengths and weaknesses. Then, (2) we examine the possibility of mediating the methodological tensions through the use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) methodology. Our conclusions are that (1) both qualitative and quantitative research traditions are equally scientific and relevant to the social science research, and so, choice can be made to use either of the two approaches or combine them depending on the nature and purpose of the study. We also argue (2) that although the attempt to resolve the qualitative-quantitative tensions through QCA methodology is promising, QCA should not be regarded as a competing but a complementary approach to the two.
Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas of Qualitative Sociology
questions addressed in this symposium are the following: Are the general theoretical or empirical claims of these books persuasive, and are they well supported by the data that are presented by the authors? Are these books persuasive because they adhere to certain methodological rules or standards, if only implicitly? And what are those rules or standards? Or are these books powerful or persuasive despite, or even because of, their lack of methodological rigor, conventionally understood? And would these books have been improved appreciably had they been more methodologically self-conscious or differently designed?