Analysis of factors underlying foreign entry strategies of terminal operators in container ports (original) (raw)
Related papers
The effect of institutional factors on public–private partnership success in ports
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015
Port public-private partnerships (PPPs) are considered to be an important emerging mechanism for port development and improvement in port performance especially for developing countries. This paper empirically investigates the effect of institutional factors in the success of port's PPPs; the latter defined as the attractiveness of the PPP project for private bidders and the market competitiveness of the facility. The empirical investigation of a large sample of ports finds that 'regulatory quality', 'market openness', 'ease to start a business' and 'enforcing contracts' are important institutional determinants of port PPP success and may ultimately contribute to port development and economic growth. The results are consistent with and add to the theoretical literature whereas practical implications for port authorities, managers and investors are discussed.
The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2015
Private container terminal operators have begun to participate in the port business in Asia since the late 1980s. Terminal operators decide whether to invest in terminal infrastructures, and the enhancement of the quality of service level. The paper analyses the influence of global terminal operators and the port ownership structure on the container terminal's efficiency. Two hundred and sixty container terminal data for China, Korea, and Japan were collected. The paper applies a negative binomial regression analysis. The paper finds that the port restructuring has contributed to productivity gains. It is found that the influence of GTO on the efficiency is evident and positively related to the port efficiency. The paper also finds that the country effect prevails over a terminal operator group effect.
Private sector participation in Asian ports
2003
Asian container ports suffer from a number of problems including insufficient port and/or terminal capacity, inefficient management and bureaucratic administration. This may be due in part to the fact that the majority of the region's ports are controlled and/or operated by public entities. To deal with these problems, port authorities of a number of countries in the region have launched programmes that aim to attract private capital into both the existing and new facilities. As a consequence, these schemes have kick-started a revolutionary new operating milieu where inter-and even intra-port competition is rife. In many instances, this has engendered the perception that organi sational restructuring (including privatisation) is not only desirable, but necessary. A key claim made with respect to organisational reforms is that the transformation of ownership from public to private sector will improve economic efficiency, as well as general welfare. Associated economic theories and existing empirical studies, however, fail to establish clear-cut evidence supporting this claim. Indeed, econometric analysis of the relative productive efficiency of the port sector pre-and post-privatisation seems to suggest that ownership itself does not seem to be categorically related to efficiency in port operations. It may well be the case, as proposed by the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD, 1995a), that the apparent absence of a clear-cut theoretical and empirical relationship may reflect, to some extent, the unique socio-political situation in which these business entities undertake their economic activities. Against this conceptual background, this paper analyses the administrative and ownership structures of the major container ports in Asia by relating them to the 'port function matrix' and assesses their relative efficiency.
Concession Agreements and Market Entry in the Container Terminal Industry
Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2008
This article was uploaded to www.porteconomics.eu On: 30/01/2010 Porteconomics.eu is a non-profit, web-based initiative aiming to advance knowledge exchange on seaport studies. Developed by researchers affiliated to various academic institutions throughout Europe, it provides freely accessible research, education and network-building material on critical issues of port economics, management and policies.
The Strategic View of Port Investment Decisions
The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, 2019
Maritime transport is most preferred transportation mode in global trade and ports are strategy model points along global supply chains due to their integral part role in maritime transportation. Efficiency and effectiveness in the port industry can create a competitive advantage to port operators and supply chains they are in part as well. In order to ensure the sustainability of ports, environmental, economic and social components of port investments must be taken into account. Thus, investment decisions have strategic importance to gain and sustain a competitive advantage, which requires an analysis of port performance indicators. Investment decisions also necessary to respond to the requirements of the industry at a level above the average, while the wrong prediction can be caused idle capacity, loosed capital and missed opportunity costs. This study aimed to create an effective decision-making process. According to this aim, SWOT, AHP and Stepwise Regression analyses are combined. Firstly, investment decision criteria were determined by SWOT analysis, and AHP technique is used for weighting the criteria. Findings of these two steps used as the inputs of investment decision. Finally, a statistical model developed to help decision makers to decide which type of investment must be made by stepwise regression analysis.
Port Strategies for the New Economy: An Empirical Investigation
2011
The proposed study is designed to measure primarily sea-based and secondarily land-based logistical links that support merchandise related trade in Asia & North America at a macro-level. The method and instrument development are based on macro-level published data. For further development, data will be collected using surveys, field observations, and interviews conducted in the United States, Korea, and China; and conceptual discourses within and beyond the research team will be used to develop conclusions. To our knowledge this is the first study to apply AHP to measure global port competitiveness along two dimensions: ‘customer-facing’ competitiveness as well as ‘investment-attracting’ competitiveness.
The Role of Various Players in the Port Industry – Theory and Practice
2006
This paper examines the role of the various players in the port industry and their interactions, and determines the impact of their actions in port operations. A mathematical approach has been developed to assist port authorities in decision making for infrastructure investment. The model examines the port investment decisions within the context of a multimodal transportation system. Model results are used to answer questions regarding the optimal investment strategy of a port authority in order to maximize the net social benefit; the impact of this strategy to the terminal operators and users; the effect of competition or cooperation between carriers; and the shippers' behavior in terms of quantity and price of goods shipped over the intermodal network. The paper concludes with a practical interpretation of the results of the theoretical models. Further improvements that would capture real world issues that are not adequately treated by the current models are discussed.
Public Private Partnerships in Spanish Ports: Current status and future prospects
Utilities Policy, 2015
Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) have proved to be more than adequate as a means to develop transport infrastructure, especially in the case of large-scale infrastructure such as ports. However, under certain specific circumstances they can lead to certain failures, and so huge public losses. Both the country's hard-hit economy and its vast experience in PPP investments make Spain an ideal case to analyse the successes and failures of these types of contracts, at a time of severe public investment constraints and need for real efficient execution of projects. This paper aims to provide an up-to-date review of PPP experiences in Spanish ports under a legislative framework which fosters public-private cooperation. More explicit and exhaustive contract terms, proper risk assignment, a higher control over demand forecast in port projects, and certain competition concerns are identified as the main requirements for future policy actions.
Port integration and competition under public and private ownership
MPRA Paper, 2021
This study investigates the effect of port integration in a mixed oligopoly framework where a public port compete with private ports under price competition. We formulate two integration models, Aintegration and B-integration, in which the public port integrates with its neighboring private port or with a non-adjacent private port, respectively. We demonstrate that the effects of A-integration (Bintegration) will (not) depend on the gross consumer benefit of the cargo shipment B-integration always makes society better off. We then examine an endogenous port integration game and show that both integration and competition are Nash equilibria under the appropriate government side payments, while B-integration can be socially desirable under public finances.