Philippine Security Implications from China’s Autonomous, Cyber, and Space Weapons Systems (original) (raw)
Related papers
Philippine US Defence Cooperation Journal of Asia Pacific Studies Jan June
Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 2019
China assertiveness in the South China Sea has considered as part of its national ambition to dominate most of the sea area as stated in its claim on the “nine-dashed line”. This China assertiveness could be seen in its more active policy by projected military power in area disputing. As one of the claimant states, the Philippine felt that China’s actions toward the region have harmed their territorial sovereignty over the West Philippine Sea. The disputed matter between the Philippine and China count active to flare up from 2010 to 2016 which marked with several incidents between both of the countries navies in Scarborough Shoal and Second Thomas Shoal. In response to the condition in the South China Sea, the Philippine was trying to enhance their defense posture which considered weak through AFP Modernization Pact initiated by President Benigno Aquino III at the beginning of his administration. Constrained by military budget allowance and limited defense equipment, the Philippine is relying on its military alliance which is the United States that has been created since a long period of time, especially in order to enhance the Philippine external defense. In 2014, both of the countries signed the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) which is the enhancement of the previous defense cooperation agreements: the Mutual Defense Treaty 1951 and the Visiting Forces Agreement 1998. This new defense cooperation agreement considered to play a significant role in supporting Philippine’ effort on responding the internal and external threats, including the unpredictable China militarization in the South China Sea.
Missile Proliferation in the Indo Pacific: Opportunities and Challenges for Philippine Deterrence
NDCP Executive Policy Brief, 2023
Long-range missile proliferation is becoming a key facet of defense modernization and expansion in the Indo-Pacific region, with the People’s Republic of China leading in the acquisition of long-range ballistic, cruise and post-ballistic missiles. Advances in technology and precision capability allow long-range missiles to coerce target small countries who don’t have the means to retaliate or have relied on masses of manpower for defense. At the same token these missiles can work for small states in providing credible deterrence with less cost in manpower. The EPB also provides some recommendations relevant to the DND and AFP to consider, both to exploit the power of these weapons and to defend against them.
Since 2011, the Aquino administration has bolstered the development of a credible external defense posture of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) in the face of China’s territorial expansion in the South China Sea. This move entailed the upgrading of the Philippine Navy’s and the Philippine Air Force’s capabilities for maritime domain awareness and naval interdiction. The Aquino administration also anchored its strategic agenda on the 60-year-old Philippines-U.S. alliance by signing the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA). The election of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte as the 16th president of the Philippines, however, generated uncertainties on whether or not he will continue building the AFP’s territorial defense capabilities. Eventually, Duterte decided to continue the Aquino administration’s build-up as a hedge, in case he should find it imperative in the future to pursue his predecessor’s policy of challenging China’s expansive claim in the South China Sea. The article concludes that like Aquino’s security policy, the Duterte administration is also committed to building up the Philippine military’s credible defense posture—in light of the growing uncertainties in the region marked by China’s emergence and the perceived retreat of the United States as a Pacific power. Key words: credible defense, Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, Rodrigo Duterte, South China Sea, U.S. alliance 自2011年起, 阿基诺政府就已加强了菲律宾武装部队（Armed Forces of the Philippines
2014
This article examines the Philippines’ strategy of external balancing against an aggressive China as it intensifies its security ties with the United States, its only strategic and long-standing ally. This course of action aims to strengthen the country’s defense relations with the United States, particularly in developing the territorial defense capabilities of the Armed Forces of the Philippines. In this process, the Philippines finds it similarly essential to establish security ties with other bilateral defense partners of the United States, such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia. In conclusion, the article argues that fostering informal security arrangements with these countries enables the Philippines to confront a pressing and persistent maritime issue in Southeast Asia: China’s expansion in the South China Sea. Key words: alliances, external balancing, hub-and-spokes, Philippine–US relations, Philippine defense policy, internal balancing.
Ateneo Chinese Studies Program Lecture Series, 2014
While the Philippines and China declared 2012 and 2013 as years of friendly exchanges between the two countries, they are currently at odds with each other due to continuing sovereignty disputes in the South China Sea. China's growing maritime capability, a result of the implementation of its current naval strategy, creates security anxieties in the Philippines. These security anxieties affect the present dynamics in Philippines-China relations. In the context of the South China Sea Disputes, the Philippines and China are now suffering a security dilemma, a tragic situation that creates enmity rather than amity in their relations. With their security dilemma, the Philippines and China are presently trapped in a "guessing game" situation, speculating on each other's strategic intention. Finding ways to ameliorate this security dilemma is essential for both countries to promote cooperation rather than competition in their overall relationship.
Cybersecurity and the Foreign Policy of the Philippines
9DashLine, 2020
Cyberspace has emerged as a strategic domain for state interactions but its strong potential for espionage, sabotage and subversion, has also made it a predominant source of insecurity. While the Philippines are still trying to make strategic sense of cyberspace, the idea of a "cyber revolution" has militarized the responses of powerful states, advancing the development of capabilities for computer network operations. The cyber revolution is based on three widely held assumptions by Western military forces: cyberspace enables asymmetric advantages; cyberspace is offense-dominant; and deterrence is ultimately difficult. Following this trend, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) developed a "Cyber Group" with the support of the United States, to strengthen the capacity of the military to protect state interests in cyberspace. While securing cyberspace is an inescapable task for any government, the AFP cannot exploit the advantages of networked technologies