Developing an Index of Liquidity-Risk Exposure: An Application to Latin American and Caribbean Banking Systems (original) (raw)
Related papers
Assessing Liquidity Buffers in the Panamanian Banking Sector
IMF Working Papers, 2016
This paper assesses the resilience of Panamanian banks to (i) a very severe short-term, and (ii) a significant long-lasting liquidity shock scenario. Short-term liquidity buffers are evaluated by approximating the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) defined in the Basel III accord. The risk of losing a substantial part of foreign funding is analyzed through a conventional liquidity stress test scrutinizing several layers of liquidity across maturity buckets. The results of this study point to some vulnerabilities. First, our approximations indicate that about half of Panamanian banks would need to adjust their liquid asset portfolios to meet current LCR standards. Second, while most banks would be able to meet funding outflows in the stress-test scenario, a number of banks would have to use up all of their liquidity buffers, and a few even face a final shortfall. Nonetheless, most banks displaying sizable liquidity shortfalls have robust solvency positions.
BANK LIQUIDITY RISK: ANALYSIS AND ESTIMATES
In today's banking business, liquidity risk and its management are some of the most critical elements that underlie the stability and security of the bank's operations, profit-making and clients confidence as well as many of the decisions that the bank makes. Managing liquidity risk in a commercial bank is not something new, yet scientific literature has not focused enough on different approaches to liquidity risk management and assessment. Furthermore, models, methodologies or policies of managing liquidity risk in a commercial bank have never been examined in detail either.
Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences
This purpose of the research is to test liquidity ratios to assess bank liquidity risks represented by liquidity ratios (current assets / current liabilities, current assets / total deposits, current assets / total assets, cash credit / total deposits, liquidity coverage ratio LCR, net stable financing ratio NSFR). This research involves evaluating these risks in banks via these ratios, and reveal the most important means used to solve these risks, including the capital adequacy ratio under the Basel II decisions and for selected period (2017-2019).The research reached the most important conclusion, which is the bank sample did not fall into bank liquidity risks throughout the years of research. Tracking specific ratio with adequacy capital of Basel II decisions of the Bank, it is noticed that it exceeds the minimum capital adequacy ratio in all valid measures, whether in Basel II decisions with 8% or the requirements of the central bank of Iraq with 12%. The research suggests some ...
Systemic liquidity risk index for Moroccan banking sector
2014
In this paper a new measure of the banking liquidity based on the liquid assets. On the basis of balance-sheet of the banks of the sample, we could detect the cycles of liquidity which characterize the Moroccan banking system and this between 2001 and 2010. The various results obtained made it possible to detect two cycles of liquidity, the first indicating one period of over liquidity, characterized by an abundance of the cushions of liquidities, the other testifying to a contraction in the mattress of liquidity of the banking system. While falling under a prudential macro approach, we were interested in the relation being able to link, the development of the liquidity and the various fluctuations of the macroeconomic framework. For this purpose, we identified several macroeconomic variables likely to influence the development of the banking liquidity, in particular, the economic growth, credit growth, exchange reserve, interbank interest rates, and return of stock market of Casabl...
Bank Risk Determinants in Latin America
Risks, 2020
Systemic Banking crises are a recurrent phenomenon that affects society, and there is a need for a better understanding of the risk factors to support prudential regulation and reduce unnecessary risk intake in the financial system. This paper examines the main bank risk determinants in Latin America. The period analysed covers the timespan from 1999 to 2013, including the systemic banking crisis episodes in Argentina (2001–2003) and Uruguay (2002–2005). We apply a new data-driven comparable methodology to classify and select commercial banks from the sample. We study bank risk proxied by the Z-score. We use the system-GMM estimator as our main empirical analysis method. According to our results, well capitalized, liquid, and traditional commercial banks are less risky. We perform robustness tests by applying OLS, and the results resemble our original model.
A Thesis Report on Determinants of Liquidity Risk of the Selected Commercial Banks in Bangladesh
2024
A comprehensive investigation into the multifaceted problem of liquidity risk and the significant implications it has for the financial stability of the Bangladeshi banking sector is presented in this thesis. In light of the fact that the banking sector plays a very important part in promoting economic expansion within the nation, it is absolutely necessary for commercial banks to have an efficient and effective management of liquidity risk in order to guarantee their stability and operational efficiency. Between the years 2013 and 2022, the primary goals of this research are to identify and analyze the key determinants of liquidity risk, as well as to evaluate the impact that these determinants have on the liquidity position of ten commercial banks that have been chosen from Bangladesh. The research makes use of a robust quantitative methodology and relies on secondary data collected from the annual financial statements of the banks during this time period. It integrates macroeconomic variables and bank-specific characteristics by employing a variety of statistical tools, including regression analysis According to the Pooled OLS and GLS models, CAR has a notable adverse effect on the liquidity situation of banks, as assessed by the Advance to Deposit Ratio (ADR). CAR is one of the three main factors that determine liquidity risk. Increased capital adequacy ratio (CAR) results in less liquidity risk. The Loans/Advances to Total Assets ratio exhibits a negative correlation with liquidity risk, as indicated by the GLS model. Increasing the ratio of loans to total assets decreases the level of liquidity risk. The association between GDP and liquidity risk (ADR) is positively significant in both Fixed Effect and Random Effect models. Banks have more liquidity risk as a result of higher economic growth. The most important findings indicate that higher capital adequacy ratios, efficient loans/advances to total assets ratios, and specific macroeconomic factors all have a significant impact on liquidity risk. Bigger banks and those with higher leverage ratios are more likely to have increased liquidity risk, contrary to the conventional beliefs that have been prevalent. In order to improve liquidity management practices, the study highlights the significance of efficient asset allocation, prudent financing, and strategic expansion. Additionally, the research highlights the importance of banks placing a high priority on the satisfaction of their customers and striving to maintain a strong reputation in order to reduce the impact that liquidity risk has on their financial stability. Furthermore, it emphasizes the significance of cultivating a culture of risk awareness and continuous learning within the banking sector in order to guarantee that financial institutions are better equipped to navigate the complexities of liquidity risk management. Maintaining optimal levels of capital adequacy, effectively managing loans and advances, closely monitoring macroeconomic factors, regularly conducting stress tests, and improving disclosure and transparency practices are some of the recommendations that have been made. Due to the fact that it relies on secondary data from a sample of ten banks over a specific ten-year period, the study is limited in its ability to understand liquidity risk in emerging economies, despite the fact that it makes a significant contribution to this understanding. As a result, the sample size should be increased in subsequent research, and primary data should be incorporated in order to validate the findings. As a conclusion, this thesis presents a comprehensive analysis of the factors that determine the level of liquidity risk in Bangladeshi commercial banks. It also offers recommendations that can be implemented to improve the banks' practices regarding the management of liquidity risk, thereby making a contribution to the stability and effectiveness of the financial system in the country.
LIQUIDITY RISK IN THE MENA REGION BANKING SECTOR: DOES BANK TYPE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?
Liquidity risk is a challenge facing banks in their efforts to maintain financial stability. Islamic banks are under added pressure with the constraint of having to adhere to Sharia’h principles. The goal of this paper is to investigate the determinants of liquidity risk in Islamic and conventional banks in the Middle East North Africa (MENA) region. The generalized, least squares model is utilized to estimate the determinants of liquidity risk in 257 banks (90 Islamic and 167 Conventional) over the period 2009-2016, in which the struggles of both types of banks to mitigate the impacts of the global financial crisis were observed. A dummy variable representing the bank type is included to allow for comparison between liquidity risk determinants in both types of banks. The model investigated the impact of four bank specific variables and a macroeconomic one on bank liquidity represented by five alternative ratios. The results show a positive effect of bank size on liquidity risk of all sample banks, thus demonstrating that both bank types follow the “too big to fail” rule. Capital adequacy has a positive impact on the liquidity risk of all sample banks irrespective of bank type. Return on assets has no significant effect while credit risk has a negative impact on liquidity risk of both bank types. That is, higher credit risk encourages a more conservative liquidity management policy in both bank types, despite the theoretical fact that Islamic banks have higher credit risk due to the “risk sharing principle”. Similarly, real per capita GDP has a positive impact on liquidity risk of conventional and Islamic banks, reflecting their procyclical lending behaviour. Evidently, bank type in the MENA region does not affect the determinants of a bank’s liquidity risk; Islamic and conventional banks use different terms for their practices, but in reality mobilize funds the same way. This is due to the fact that both banks operate under the same micro- and macroeconomic conditions and are both influenced by the same domestic and international liquidity regulations. Introducing more efficient financial products and having a unified regulatory and supervisory framework can offer Islamic banks better opportunities. JEL Classification: G11, G20, G21, G32, G33, Z1 Keywords: Liquidity risk, Liquidity ratio, Islamic banks, MENA region, Islamic finance, Bank size, Capital adequacy, ROAA, Credit risk.
Bank Liquidity Risk and Performance
This study is to employ alternative liquidity risk measures besides liquidity ratio, and investigate the causes of liquidity risk (causes of liquidity risk model), using an unbalanced panel dataset of 12 advanced economies commercial banks over the period 1994-2006. Thus, we apply panel data instrumental variables regression, using two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimators to estimate bank liquidity risk and performance model. We find that liquidity risk is the endogenous determinant of bank performance. The causes of liquidity risk include components of liquid assets and dependence on external funding, supervisory and regulatory factors and macroeconomic factors.