How narratives about the secondary-tertiary transition shape undergraduate tutors’ sense-making of their teaching (original) (raw)

Abstract

Drawing on the commognitive framework, we construe the secondary-tertiary transition (STT) as a distinctive element in the pedagogical discourses of various communities. Our interest rests with university tutors in light of the emergent recognition of their impact on undergraduates’ mathematics learning in many tertiary contexts worldwide. We aim to understand the roles of STT communication in tutors’ reflections on incidents that took place in their tutorials. Our participants were undergraduate students in the advanced stages of their mathematics degrees in a large New Zealand university and who were enrolled in a mathematics education course. Throughout the semester, the participants led tutorial sessions for first-year students and wrote reflections on classroom incidents that drew their attention. Our data corpus consisted of 58 reflections from 38 tutors collected over four semesters. The analysis revealed that STT communication featured in tutors’ descriptions of classroom in...

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (50)

  1. Adiredja, A. P., & Louie, N. (2020). Untangling the web of deficit discourses in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 40, 42-46.
  2. Anthony, G., Hunter, R., & Hunter, J. (2018). Challenging teachers' perceptions of student capability through professional development: A telling case. Professional Development in Education, 44(5), 650- 662. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 19415 257. 2017. 13878 68
  3. Bernstein, B., & Solomon, J. (1999). "Pedagogy, identity and the construction of a theory of symbolic con- trol": Basil Bernstein questioned by Joseph Solomon. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 265-279. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 01425 69999 5443
  4. Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1-21. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ 448619
  5. Clark, M., & Lovric, M. (2008). Suggestion for a theoretical model for secondary-tertiary transition in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 25-37. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ bf032 17475
  6. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Heath & Co. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 10903-000
  7. Fey, J. T. (1977). Report of study group D: Minimal competencies in mathematics. The Arithmetic Teacher, 24(5), 405-407. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5951/ at. 24.5. 0405
  8. Gueudet, G. (2008). Investigating the secondary-tertiary transition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 237-254. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10649-007-9100-6
  9. Hammersley, M. (2012). Troubling theory in case study research. Higher Education Research & Develop- ment, 31(3), 393-405. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 07294 360. 2011. 631517
  10. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Sfard, A. (2012). Identity struggles in the mathematics classroom: On learning mathematics as an interplay of mathematizing and identifying. International Journal of Educational Research, 51, 128-145. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijer. 2011. 12. 015
  11. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Shabtay, G. (2019). Narratives of 'good' instruction: Teachers' identities as draw- ing on exploration vs. acquisition pedagogical discourses. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 51, 541-554. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11858-018-01019-3
  12. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, T. (2016). Opportunities for learning given to prospec- tive mathematics teachers: Between ritual and explorative instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19, 547-574. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10857-015-9311-1
  13. Hochmuth, R., Broley, L., & Nardi, E. (2021). Transitions to, across and beyond university. In V. Durand- Guerrier, R. Hochmuth, E. Nardi, & C. Winsløw (Eds.), Research and development in university math- ematics education (pp. 193-215). Routledge.
  14. Hong, Y. Y., Kerr, S., Klymchuk, S., McHardy, J., Murphy, P., Spencer, S., Thomas, M. O. J., & Watson, P. (2009). A comparison of teacher and lecturer perspectives on the transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 40(7), 877-889. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 00207 39090 32237 54
  15. Jaworski, B. (2002). Sensitivity and challenge in university mathematics tutorial sessions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1/2), 71-94. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1023/A: 10224 91404 298
  16. Johns, C. A., & Burks, L. C. (2022). A Framework for mathematical knowledge for undergraduate math- ematics tutors. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1-30. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s40753-022-00165-0
  17. Klymchuk, S., Gruenwald, N., & Jovanovski, Z. (2011). University lecturers' views on the transition from secondary to tertiary education in mathematics: An international survey. Mathematics Teach- ing-Research Journal Online, 5(1), 101-128.
  18. Kontorovich, I. Herbert, R., & Yoon, C. (2019). Students resolve a commognitive conflict between col- loquial and calculus discourses on steepness. In J. Monaghan, E. Nardi, & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Cal- culus in upper secondary and beginning university mathematics -Conference proceedings (pp. 119-122). MatRIC. https:// matric-calcu lus. scien cesco nf. org/ data/ pages/ CalcC onf20 19_ Papers_ 190910. pdf.
  19. Kontorovich, I. (2021). Minding mathematicians' discourses in investigations of their feedback on stu- dents' proofs: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 213-234. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10649-021-10035-2
  20. Kontorovich, I., & Locke, K. (2022). The area enclosed by a function is not always the definite integral: Re-learning through transitioning within learning-support systems. Digital Experiences in Math- ematics Education. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s40751-022-00116-z
  21. Kontorovich, I., & Ovadiya, T. (2022). Secondary-tertiary transition and undergraduate tutoring: Novice tutors make sense of their teaching of first-year courses. In S. S. Karunakaran & A. Higgins (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 314-322). RUME.
  22. Lavie, I., Steiner, A., & Sfard, A. (2019). Routines we live by: From ritual to exploration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(2), 153-176. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10649-018-9817-4
  23. Lawson, D., & Croft, T. (2021). Lessons for mathematics higher education from 25 years of mathematics support. In In V. Durand-Guerrier, R. Hochmuth, E. Nardi, and C. Winsløw (Eds.), Research and development in university mathematics education (pp. 22-40). Routledge.
  24. Lerman, S. (1998). Research on socio-cultural perspectives of mathematics teaching and learning. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for iden- tity (pp. 333-350). Kluwer Academic Press.
  25. Locke, K., Frankcom-Burgess, R., Passmore, R., & Kontorovich, I. (2020). Calculus in secondary school and in teacher education in New Zealand. ResearchGate https:// www. resea rchga te. net/ publi cation/ 35325 7699_ Calcu lus_ in_ secon dary_ school_ and_ in_ teach er_ educa tion_ in_ New_ Zeala nd London Mathematical Society. (1995). Tackling the mathematics problem. https:// dokum en. tips/ docum ents/ tackl ing-the-mathe matics-probl em-mei-tackl ing-the-mathe matics-probl em-c-the-london. html
  26. Markovits, Z., & Smith, M. S. (2008). Cases as tools in mathematics teacher education. In D. Tirosh, & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education, tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (vol. 2, pp. 39-65). Sense Publishers.
  27. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. Routledge. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4324/ 97802 03471 876
  28. Moore, W. G. (1968). The tutorial system and its future. Pergamon Press.
  29. Morgan, C. (2020). Discourse analytic approaches in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Ency- clopaedia of mathematics education (pp. 223-227). Springer.
  30. Nardi, E., Jaworski, B., & Hegedus, S. (2005). A spectrum of pedagogical awareness for undergradu- ate mathematics: From "tricks" to "techniques." Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(4), 284-316. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2307/ 30035 042
  31. Nardi, E., Ryve, A., Stadler, E., & Viirman, O. (2014). Commognitive analyses of the learning and teaching of mathematics at university level: The case of discursive shifts in the study of Calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 182-198. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 14794 802. 2014. 918338
  32. Nardi, E. (2008). Amongst mathematicians: Teaching and learning mathematics at university level. Springer.
  33. Oates, G., Paterson, J., Reilly, I., & Statham, M. (2005). Effective tutorial programmes in tertiary math- ematics. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 36(7), 731- 739. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 00207 39050 02714 61
  34. Pinto, A. (2019). Towards transition-oriented pedagogies in university calculus courses. In J. Monaghan, E. Nardi, & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Calculus in upper secondary and beginning university mathematics -Con- ference proceedings (139-142). MatRIC. https:// matric-calcu lus. scien cesco nf. org/ data/ pages/ CalcC onf20 19_ Papers_ 190910. pdf
  35. Püschl, J. (2017). Identifying discussion patterns of teaching assistants in mathematical tutorials in Ger- many.
  36. In T. Dooley, & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2225-2232). DCU Institute of Education and ERME.
  37. Resnick, L., Asterhan C., & Clarke, S. N. (Eds.). (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. AERA.
  38. Rowland, T., Turner, F., & Thwaites, A. (2014). Research into teacher knowledge: A stimulus for develop- ment in mathematics teacher education practice. ZDM-Mathematics Education 46, 317-328. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11858-013-0564-9
  39. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3102/ 00131 89x02 70020 04
  40. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and math- ematizing. Cambridge University Press. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ CBO97 80511 499944
  41. Sfard, A. (2014). University mathematics as a discourse -Why, how, and what for? Research in Mathemat- ics Education, 16(2), 199-203. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 14794 802. 2014. 918339
  42. Sfard, A. (2020). Learning, discursive fault lines, and dialogic engagement. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (pp. 89-99). Routledge.
  43. Shulman, L. S. (1992). Towards a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher edu- cation (pp. 1-29). Teachers College Press.
  44. Speer, N., Gutman, T., & Murphy, T. J. (2005). Mathematics teaching assistant preparation and develop- ment. College Teaching, 53(2), 75-80. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3200/ ctch. 53.2. 75-80
  45. Thoma, A., & Nardi, E. (2018). Transition from school to university mathematics: Manifestations of unresolves commognitive conflict in first year students' examination scripts. International Jour- nal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4, 161-180. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s40753-017-0064-3
  46. Thomas, M. O. J., de Freitas Druck, I., Huillet, D., Ju, M. K., Nardi, E., Rasmussen, C., & Xie, J. (2015). Survey team 4: Key mathematical concepts in the transition from secondary to university. In Cho, S. (Ed), The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Springer, Cham. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-3-319-12688-3_ 18
  47. Viirman, O. (2015). Explanation, motivation and question posing routines in university mathematics teach- ers' pedagogical discourse: A commognitive analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Educa- tion in Science and Technology, 46(8), 1165-1181. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 00207 39x. 2015. 10342 06
  48. Viirman, O. (2021). University mathematics lecturing as modelling mathematical discourse. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 7I, 466-489. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s40753-021-00137-w
  49. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard Univer- sity Press. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2307/j. ctvjf 9vz4
  50. Yee, S., Deshler, J., Cervello Rogers, K., Petrulis, R., Potvin, C. D., & Sweeney, J. (2022). Bridging the gap between observation protocols and formative feedback. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25, 217-245. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10857-020-09485-x