The impact of ideology upon Arab unity (original) (raw)
Related papers
Arab Unity Revisited: Nationalism versus Common Cause
Arab unity is by no means a new idea, and strides towards greater cooperation have taken place throughout the history of the modern Middle East. From Pan-Arabism, to Nasserism, to Islamism, no recent decade has ever gone without its own widespread notion of a single, collective community existing in the Middle East. After years of dialogue supporting the concept of Arab unity, however, what do Arab states have to show for it? If history is to be our guide, what can countries of the Middle East learn from past crises to help them in the future? What causes Arab states to unite or disunite, and has “Arab unity” ever existed? If a collective will is necessary to solve the problems of the future, what does the past foretell: a grim or hopeful picture? This book explains how relationships between Arab states came to be and what forces impacted their actions and beliefs. It looks at three significant events in recent Middle East history -- the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, the 1973 Arab-Israeli War and Oil Embargo, and the 1991 Gulf War -- then analyzes why Arab unity failed or triumphed, and makes connections and conclusions for the future of the region.
Islamic sources of contemporary Arab national unity and identity
2002
Research work upon the historical sources of the idea of Arab world unity facilitates the understanding of contemporary realities of that region. It serves the analysis and synthesis of conditions accompanying the emergence, in the first half of the VII century A. D., of this idea, which had preserved its relevance in the process of the later history of the Arab-Islamic world and acquired special significance in modern and present times-within the framework of contemporary .political doctrines.The importance of the subject is ascertained-amongst others-by the following considerations: the idea of Arab unity is positively evaluated in the doctrines and programmes of numerous political parties and orientations of the Arab world (Naserism and various shades of the so-called Arab socialism, the Arab B'ath Socialist Party, Islamic orientations and-naturally-the Arab nationalist movement); the idea of Arab unity involves many highly significant problems of current socio-political realities of particular Arab countries as well as the entire Arab world (questions of democracy or-in other words-political pluralism, equal rights for women and the role of the latter in social Ufe); the constant presence of early Islamic tradition in political thought and practice of contemporary Arab world.
1996
The transliteration apparatus has been kept to the minimum. The only diacritical mark in the transliteration are 'ayns. The 'ayn is indicated by [' ]. Arabic names as those familiar to the reader in their Anglicized versions are rendered as such and not in transliteration (e. g. Nasser). Names of Arab writers who publish in English are spelt the way they appear in their own publications and therefore discrepancies are available as far as these are concerned. The Arabic article ''all' usually only appears when reference is first made to the subject in the whole of the research.
In search o f Arab unity 1930-1945. 1. A rab countries-Politics and governm ent I. Title 32 0.917'4927 JQ 1850.A 3 ISB N 13: 978-0-714-63264-3 (hbk) IS B N 13: 9 7 8 -0-714-64051-8 (pbk)
This essay examines the function of the concept of the nation-state in the Arab world. The essay comparatively assesses the meaning of the nation-state and how it has been received in the Arab World, relying on the results of a study conducted amongst Arab thinkers, politicians and statesmen since the end of World War I. The first section outlines the pertinence of the earlier debate with regards to both the concept and the context of framing nations within a post-Ottoman political environment. In the following sections, the article discusses the emergence of the nation-state and its characteristics in general and then examines the Arab nation-state specifically, from its sense of belonging and positive ideology to the inevitable clash of identities. Finally, it critically analyses the failure of integration within nation-states in the Arab World and their struggle for legitimacy based on new modern constitutions.
In Search of a Political Vision for the Arab World
The Arab uprisings have, in some countries, ousted authoritarian rulers and everywhere expressed democratic aspirations of an Arab public sphere. This presents an unprecedented opportunity to break a long cycle of authoritarianism and oppression, and the chance for Arab populations to realise their right to political self-determination.
Albert Hourani, the distinguished historian of the Middle East, once observed that any book on twentieth-century Arab politics must "express a dialectic of unity and variety." Local interests and geopolitical imperatives pull Arab-speaking peoples apart, while the persistence of inherited traits, historic memories, and the attempt to address certain shared problems of identity bring them closer together. 1 Hourani was not alone among historians of Arab politics to note how the tension between transnational bonds and territorial divides has produced a rich mixture of conflict and cooperation among Arab states. For many observers, inter-Arab politics can be defined by the search for integration among Arab states and peoples, inspired by the belief that they are members of the Arab nation, only to be undermined by the existence of latent mistrust and manifested conflict. Such antagonisms, however, never fully extinguish the promise of integration, for the Arab states almost always return to solidarity after such conflict. Inter-Arab politics exhibits an inescapable rhythm of conflict and cooperation, itself a product of the dialectic of unity nurtured by the existence of transnational bonds and of the variety generated by rivalries that are part and parcel of territorial possessiveness and personal jealousies.
Arabs' Fractured Oneness and the Split Identity in the Post-Arab Spring Era
" You shall know a word by the company it keeps " 1 John Robert Firth rightly says. A single word in isolation has no sense. Same is the case with individuals, societies, cultures, and nations. In a way or another, the horse is distinguished when connected with other set of animals such as camels, oxen or mules. Similarly, an individual, a culture or a society is defined when it is combined with its opposites, binaries or contradictories. In other words, identity, whether individual, ethnic, racial, national, socio-political or even hybrid is realized only when it's compared or associated with a set of relations or concepts which, collectively, participate in forming one's/societies identity as whole. As we all know, the construction of one's identity takes longer time; keeps evolving with the passage of time; and affects and being affected inwardly and outwardly. This humble research argues the status of the Arab unitary Identity in the age of globalization and how, from the second half of the twentieth century (known as Post-colonial period), the tyrannical men of power and dynastical or monarchical regimes, negatively, contributed to the decay of the Arabs' oneness; and consequently lead to the pitiable contemporary Arabic situation. This dreadful situation caused a big trauma in the Arab identity and accordingly resulted in a crisis, devastation and loss of identity. Thus, this paper tries to tackle the heart of the matter of identity and classifies the impact of the disintegration of Arabs on the shattered aspirations of the young Arab generations. It also questions the rise and fall of Arab hopes for founding a territorial entity based on a unified identity, focusing on issues that contribute to the prevailing impasse at the beginning of the 21st century. In summing up, the present paper sheds light on the challenges the Arab-Spring generation encounters, particularly, at the Post-Arab Spring era; and how their struggle for collective Arabic identity is perceived by others.
Reflectionson Arab Nationalism
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.