“Si Saowaphak: The ‘Phantom King’ in Thailand’s History”, Indian Journal of Tai Studies, Vol 11, 2011, pp. 131-6. (original) (raw)
Related papers
What Happened at Nong Sarai? Comparing Indigenous and European Sources for Late 16th Century Siam
The elephant duel in 1593 at Nong Sarai between Naresuan and the Burmese crown prince is one of the most famous incidents in Thai history, often repeated in a standard version. In fact, there are (at least) ten different accounts of the battle that differ widely. Comparing these accounts by Siamese, Burmese, European and Persian authors throws insight both on what may have truly happened at Nong Sarai and on the writing of Thai history.
"Siam" Ten Ways to Look at Thailand's History,
A booklet intended for those who have little or no prior knowledge of Thai history. Thai History is presented according to a set of themes, thus avoiding the mix of kings, Buddhism, rice and revolution that characterizes much historical writing on Thailand. More details: see http://www.reihe-gelbe-erde.de/rge/009.html
The Ming shi-lu as a Source for Thai History — Fourteenth to Seventeenth Centuries
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2000
By examining the references to the Ayudhyan polity contained in the Ming imperial annals, and comparing them with the local chronicular accounts of that polity, this article suggests a greater consonance between what is contained in the Ming texts and the van Vliet version of the chronicles (based on the Sangitiyavan). Other suggestions about the early history of Ayudhya are made on the basis of the Chinese texts. A precis of the Chinese references is included as an appendix to the article.
The significance of peninsular Siam in the Southeast Asian maritime world
2005
This thesis would not have become possible without the generous financial support of the Anandamahidol Foundation, under the Royal Patronage of His Majesty King Bhumibol of Siam. The foundation has funded me for my study at the University of Hawai'i and for my research. This academic endeavor would not have come to fruition without the patience and unending support of my thesis committee, including Drs. Miriam Stark, James Bayman, and Michael Aung-Thwin. My gratitude also goes to Drs. Leonard Andaya and Dhida Saraya who offered me valuable suggestions on the Southeast Asian maritime interaction. I would particularly like to single out Dr. Miriam Stark, my advisor, for special mentions. The advice and guidance that she has showered upon me during my time at the University of Hawai'i have not only shaped me into a better student, but also groomed me for my life ahead. I am indebted to many people and organizations in Thailand, in particular to Professor Surapol Nathapintu, the Dean of the Faculty of Archaeology of Silpakom University. I am grateful to the Fine Arts Department for making available data of the archaeological sites for this thesis, Research and Development Office of Prince of Songkhla University for the base maps in the thesis, and Walailuk University for the GPS unit used during my survey in Nakhon Si Thammarat. I would like to thank my family for cultivating my interest in archaeology and for their unconditional love. Many thanks are due to all my friends in Hawai'i and Thailand, especially to Nantiya Janchanakit for cartographic assistance, Soon Hock Kang and Koh Keng We for proofreading, Cyril Calugay for stimulating discussions, and Somjat Sukcharem for his support in my survey. Last but not least, I wish to thank Nareerat Leelachat for the everlasting help, hospitality, and encouragement that she has always given to me. Thank you very much. IV 6. The Distribution of the Earliest Vishnu and Buddha Images 67 a. The Earliest Vishnu Images in Peninsular Siam b. The Earliest Buddha Images in Peninsular Siam IV. Data Analysis and Interpretation A. Phase I: The early coastal polities (c. fifth century BC-fifth century AD) 72 1. The Application of a Dual-Processual Theory 75 2. The Application of Peer Polity Interaction B. Phase II: The Early Mandalas (c. fifth century-tenth century AD) Chapter 4: Tambralinga Case Study I. Geographical Overview II. Archaeological Database A. Archaeological Background prior to the Fifth Century AD B. The Early Historic Sites (c. fifth to tenth centuries AD) 1. Methodology 2. The Distribution of Early Historic Sites a. The Group of the Tha Khwai River 104 b. The Group of the Tha Chieo-Tha Thon Rivers 107 c. The Group of the Tha Lat River 112 d. The Group of the Maying River 114 e. The Group of the Haad Sai Keao Sand Dune 118 IV. Interpretation and Discussion 123 A. The Early Mandala of Tambralinga (c. fifth to tenth centuries AD) 123 B. The Inter-Mandala Interaction 135 Chapter 5: Summary and Conclusion Figures Bibliography v 162 164 164 165 166 Figure 43. Vishnu from Satingpra 44. The Yarang Complex 45. Peninsular Siam and Nakhon Si Thammarat 46. Geography ofNakhon Si Thammarat 47. The Nakhon Si Thammarat City and the sand dune 48. The Distribution of Early Historical Sites in Nakhon Si Thammarat 49. The inscription ofHup Khao Chong Koy 50.
Journal of the Siam Society, 2022
This article presents research findings from a project seeking to plug gaps in accounts of Muslim actors in Siam between the early 17th and the mid-19th century, between the reigns of King Prasat Thong (r. 1629-1656) and King Rama III (r. 1824-1851). We limit ourselves to the legacy of the descendants of Sultan Sulaiman (r. 1620-1676), which-for comparative purposes-we juxtapose with Sheikh Ahmad Qomi. We begin by contextualising both of these by documenting Siam's administrative structure and culture. This is followed by the succession, rebellion and rehabilitation of Sultan Sulaiman's eldest son, Mustapha (between 1676 and 1692), before considering the administrative and military careers of Hussein (d. 1693) and Hasan (d. 1691), and the range of contributions by the descendants of Mustapha, Hussein and Hasan. These reveal hitherto overlooked connections between South and Central Thailand, similarities between these Muslim lineages, their mixed fortunes, the contributions of the Sultan Sulaiman lineage to the military, the side forms that co-option by Ayutthaya and Bangkok took, that led some to forsake the religion of these lineages for Buddhism.
(2019) The Legacy of Melaka's 15th Century Successes in 16th Century Siam
2019
main-page/conference/dr-christopher-m-joll/ The Legacy of Melaka’s 15th Century Successes in 16th Century Siam This paper seeks to respond to the perceived dearth of studies pursuing an explicitly comparative approach to Southeast Asian historiography. Before the publication of Chris Baker’s Ayutthaya Rising From Land or Sea?, there were a few examples in the secondary literature on “littoral“, and “mainland” of any engagement between Thai Studies specialists and members of the Malay Studies Guild. Although this paper seeks to build on Baker’s seminal contribution to comparative historiography vis-à-vis mainland Southeast Asia subservient to Ayutthaya, and Melaka, I ask questions about what insights into Melaka in the 15th century might be provided from an exploration of developments in the 16th. I argue that the prosperity of port cities such as Ayutthaya and Patani following 1511, confirms Melaka’s regional importance in the 15th Century. Furthermore, the presence of transcultural entrepreneurs in Siamese palaces and ports suggests Ayutthaya to have actively imitated Melaka’s highly successful cosmopolitan model. Finally, I consider case studies of how aspects of Melaka’s religious cosmopolitanism spread to Ayutthaya. These include Sufi tariqat, and Persian mercantile networks present in South Indian port cities arriving via transpeninsular portages revitalised by mercantile networks forced to establish new operational hubs.