World Responsibility to Act in Russia’s War Against Ukraine (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Role of the United Nations Security Council in Responding to the Bloody Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Anggi Saputra, 2024
The United Nations is an international organization that regulates and maintains world peace and security. Promote and encourage the running of the economy and in various other social fields between state cooperation. In addition, the United Nations has functioned as a center for coordinating actions that threaten stability and humanity in the world, namely international conflicts. The Russian invasion conflict into Ukraine is one example of an international conflict that occurred. The invasion threatens international stability and national security, thus the role of the United Nations in resolving the conflict over Russia's invasion of Ukraine is urgently needed. The United Nations has a Security Council which has the right to regulate conflict issues that occur in a country, especially the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This writing uses a literature review research method, using reading books, journals and other literature publications that are related to the topic being researched.
Juma, Johnstone, Reimagining the International Legal order in the UN Security Council in the Wake of the Ongoing Russia-Ukraine War (October 25, 2022). Available at SSRN:, 2022
This paper seeks to identify the current problems that have arose in the UN security council and how they look similar to those that were present during the cold war. How the use of veto powers, ideological differences among others has hindered the UN Security Council from fully implementing its mandate. This paper further seeks to show how the UN has failed as a body to aid the Ukrainians and further demonstrate the various problematic Iegal issues that are currently being witnessed in the Security Council. This paper will also recommend what ought to be done interms of the international legal order to avoid escalation of such war in future.
Новітня доба, 2024
The activities of the UN General Assembly in the context of the contemporary Russian-Ukrainian war are studied. Unlike the UN Security Council, the General Assembly's work was not hindered by the restrictions of the veto power, which the Russian Federation, as a permanent member of the Security Council, consistently abuse. This distinction significantly influenced the outcomes of the General Assembly, which swiftly addressed the war triggered by Russian aggression against Ukraine from its early stages in 2014. The course of adoption and the key content of UN General Assembly resolutions related to Russian aggression against Ukraine in 2014–2023 are traced: resolution 68/262 «Territorial integrity of Ukraine» dated March 28, 2014; resolutions «Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)» 2016–2022; resolutions «The problem of militarization of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine), as well as parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov» 2018–2021; resolutions of the Eleventh Extraordinary Special Session of the UN General Assembly dedicated to the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 (ES-11/1 – ES-11/6). The analysis UN General Assembly resolutions lack binding legal force, being advisory and recommendatory in nature, they nonetheless reflect substantial global support for Ukraine, particularly among Western countries. The UN General Assembly under the conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian war, became for the Ukrainian leadership one of the platforms from which, by preparing and initiating the consideration of resolutions, it was possible to convey to the world public Ukrainian approaches to the Russian aggression, to call for its firm condemnation and, in coordination with other states of the world, to seek ways to settle the Russian-Ukrainian war and achieve a just peace in accordance with the UN Charter, the norms of international law and the national interests of Ukraine.
This paper considered the mechanism of operation of international treaties in general and the content and problems of applying jus cogens norms. The study investigated the practice of implementing the provisions of several international acts, namely the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Budapest Memorandum, and the Charter of the United Nations. The article examines the interaction of the Russian Federation with the international institutions of which it is a member, examines the reaction of the most influential international organisations, such as the United Nations, the Council of Europe, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the World Health Organisation, in connection with Russian aggression. The study considers the issues of deterring armed aggression, protecting human rights, reforming global institutions, and coordinating the actions of the international community in response to threats to peace and security.
2024
This book begins with an examination of the powers of the UN General Assembly and the legal character of its resolutions, analyzing the UN Charter and related documents, as well as the interpretation of relevant provisions by the International Court of Justice, the General Assembly itself, and international legal doctrine. The author analyzes the UN General Assembly resolutions from 2014 through 2023 on the territorial integrity of Ukraine, condemnation of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation, war crimes committed by its political and military leadership and Russian citizens, the legal responsibility of the Russian Federation and its citizens, as well as the parameters of a future just and lasting peace.
Petraniwati Witus, 2022
Abstract. With the United Nations in existence for the last seven decades, most global citizens may feel in a comfort zone, where there are no physical wars like before. However, this was broken by the military operations carried out by Russia to a number of cities in Ukraine. The attack on Ukraine by Russia was the largest military offensive on the European continent after World War II, nor was it the previous one between the two. The attack on February 24, 2022, is believed by Russia to be an effort to maintain a sense of security from the shadow of NATO - a military power unit - western countries, in areas that are directly with their country. In addition, the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin claims that Ukraine is his brother based on historical background, namely before the breakup of the Soviet Union, and for that reason also western Russia Ukraine to join forces. This paper analyzes the role of the United Nations in finding conclusions on these problems, regarding the role, influencing factors, and goals of the United Nations in finding a resolution to conflicts. The United Nations organization has a great obligation to be the main tool in resolving this conflict, given its capabilities, and many countries can contribute, so that later the Russian-Ukrainian conflict can be resolved. Keywords : Russia-Ukraine, NATO, UN, Conflict Resolution, Mediation.
Revista Ruptura
The International Court of Justice, to ensure friendly relationships between the international community, has recognized the importance of the principles of non-intervention and prohibited the use of force as a limit and guarantee of the sovereignty of nations. Nevertheless, during 2022 actions have been presented in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict that can be considered illegal inferences that involve the use of force. The present article aims to analyze the events that occurred during this conflict and contrast them with the international principles of non-intervention and prohibited use of force based on the ICJ jurisprudence and doctrinal approaches. In conclusion, the transgression of the analyzed principles by Russia against Ukraine is argued, which leads to the existence of international liability and the duty to repair and indemnify.
Journal of Public Administration, Policy and Governance Research (JPAPGR), , 2024
This paper examines some of most complex and intriguing issues surrounding the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the role of UNSC and the five Permanent Members(P5) with veto powers. It raises a fundamental question whether we should hope that the world would be a better place if the P5 are tripped of the veto. To address this question, the study attempts a critical analysis of debates surrounding the relevance of the veto power exercised by the P5. And examined moral challenge of the P5 in the exercise of the veto power. The study adopted the qualitative content analysis approach whereby data collected from secondary source were reviewed and analyzed within the purview of the study. The paper argued that the five permanent member veto option remain an instrument of the last resort in the resistance against uncontested power and casual use of the veto by powerful nations; as the P5 have held the UN together despite the veto diametrically opposed blocs. Finally, conclude in a way of policy prescription as an alternative.
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LAW IN CURRENT GLOBAL RELATIONS: THE CASE OF WAR IN UKRAINE
IRASA SETI , 2024
International public law, comprising the legal principles governing the relations between sovereign states and international actors, is integral to maintaining global order and addressing conflicts. The war in Ukraine, which began with Russia's invasion in February 2022, has become a focal point for the application and challenges of international law in contemporary global relations. The conflict in Ukraine underscores critical aspects of international public law, particularly regarding state sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the prohibition of aggression. Russia's actions have been widely condemned by the international community as violations of these core principles, leading to a series of sanctions and diplomatic responses aimed at restoring peace and upholding international norms. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has launched investigations into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity, reinforcing the global commitment to accountability and justice. The war also highlights the role and limitations of international institutions, such as the United Nations (UN) Security Council, where geopolitical dynamics often impede decisive action. Despite these challenges, various international bodies, including the UN General Assembly and the European Union (EU), have played significant roles in coordinating responses, providing humanitarian aid, and supporting Ukraine's sovereignty. In the broader context of global relations, the Ukraine conflict illustrates the complexities and crucial importance of international public law. It demonstrates the ongoing struggle to balance state sovereignty with international norms on human rights and the laws of war. The international community's efforts—ranging from diplomatic initiatives and economic sanctions to legal proceedings and humanitarian support—reflect the evolving and critical role of international law in fostering peace, security, and justice in an increasingly interconnected world.
Academia Letters, 2022
Public international law, in particular international humanitarian law, goes beyond our professional interest. However, the war against Ukraine forced me to write this short scientific paper for further discussion. I want to create from the fact that there is a principle that exists for both public and private law. This is the principle of pacta sunt servanda, that is, any agreement must be properly designed, whether private (civil) or international. Failure to comply with or improper implementation of this principle requires the application of sanctions, ie liability for its violation. Moreover, I believe that any international agreements that have been duly approved are binding. Memorandum on Security Guarantees in Connection with Ukraine's Accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of 5 December 1994 (the so-called Budapest Memorandum) cannot create obligations only for Ukraine as a member state. In accordance with the above principle, it is the basis for the emergence of obligations for all signatory states. The same rule applies to convention obligations: a state that has signed an international treaty, regardless of its type, assumes obligations under this treaty. According to Art. 2 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969, a treaty is binding on a contracting state, whether or not it has entered into force. Pursuant to paragraphs 1-6 of the Memorandum of Security Guarantees in connection with Ukraine's accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of 5 December 1994, reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine as a non-nuclear-weapon State to respect its independence and also sovereignty and existing borders, do not use weapons and economic