EU Member States’ Representation in the European Parliament: the Politics of Seat Reapportionment in a Historical Perspective (original) (raw)
Summary Modern democratic political systems are hardly conceivable without political representation. This also applies to the political system of the EU, and namely the European Parliament. The EP has undergone several changes over time, including changes in its composition. The case study addresses the composition of the EP from the historical perspective. It investigates the origins of the EP’s composition, reapportionment strategies chosen and their effects on malapportionment of the EP seats. When changing the EP’s composition, the accommodation, expansionary and redistributive modes can be distinguished. While the accommodation mode is closely linked to the processes of enlargement, the expansionary and redistributive modes follow both enlargements and institutional reforms. The redistribution mode may be the strategy for the maintenance of malapportionment while the expansionary mode is a way to reduce the disproportionality of seat allocation among Member States in the contex...
Related papers
Enlargement and the ‘normal’European Parliament
2009
There are, at least, two reasons to suspect that enlargement may affect the dominance of ideology-based competition between supranational parties in EP politics. First, it is unclear to what extent the Members of European Parliament (MEPs) from the new member states fit in the existing ideological and partisan structure of the EP and thus, whether 'old'and 'new'EU members share a 'common political space'(see Marks and Steenbergen, 2002).
Best and Semenova (2015) The development of parliamentary representation in post-1990 Europe.pdf
Since the Treaty of the European Union was ratified in 1993, the European Union has become an important factor in an ever-increasing number of regimes of pooled sovereignty. This Handbook seeks to present a valuable guide to this new and unique system in the twenty-first century, allowing readers to obtain a better understanding of the emerging multilevel European governance system that links national polities to Europe and the global community. Adopting a pan-European approach, this Handbook brings together the work of leading international academics to cover a wide range of topics such as:
Political representation in the European Parliament
1997
The political structure of the European Union is experiencing a period of critical change, as leaders seek to address the twin problems of the 'democratic deficit'and institutional effectiveness in the Intergovernmental Conference. Problems of governance, already serious, have become more urgent, and will be further compounded by increasing EU powers and subsequent waves of European enlargement.
This quantitative analysis deals with the issue of the apportionment of seats in the European Parliament amongst the 28 Member States and its goal is to quantify the existing principle for allocating the EP seats, the so-called principle of degressive proportionality provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 14 (2) of the Treaty on European Union. The analysis employs quantitative tools commonly used in electoral analysis for measuring disproportionality of electoral rules (the discrepancy between seats and votes). At the individual (Member State) level, the paper finds both the value of a vote (the average size of population per seat) and how much each of the Member States overrepresented or underrepresented (by the advantage ratio measure). At the aggregate level for the whole European Parliament representation, the value of malapportionment is measured by the distortion index created by Loosemore and Hanby (1971), as it was earlier suggested as a suitable strategy for measuring malapportionment by Samuels and Snyder (1991).
This paper will examine the impact the last enlargements and treaty change have had on the European Parliament and the EU's system of legislative procedures. The paper assesses the dynamics of the European Parliament in operating according to a set of parliamentary functions. The overall question is, how the EP performs in adopting European legislation and in controlling the Union's quasi-executive brances. Do the rules provided by treaties, inter-institutional agreements and similar bases matter for the EP as a "multifunctional organization" (Judge/Earnshaw 2003: 24) and how do they matter for the repartition of workload within the European Parliament? In analysing the European Parliament's practice during the past 1994-1999, 1999-2004, and 2004-2009 legislatures, I propose to investigate the parliamentary implementation of the treaties and treaty amendments. In other terms, I explore the "real use" of different "constitutional offers" at h...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Related papers
The Role of the European Parliament in Europe’s Integration and Parliamentarization Process
published in Costa, O., Stavridis, S., Dri, C. (dir.), The parliamentary dimension(s) of regionalization and globalization, Londres, Palgrave, 2013, pp. 45-69, 2013