Interpretation bias and social anxiety: does interpretation bias mediate the relationship between trait social anxiety and state anxiety responses? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2010
This study investigated whether high socially anxious individuals interpret other people's ambiguous behavior in a more negative or threatening manner in comparison to low socially anxious individuals, after controlling for the effects of depression. High and low socially anxious participants (N = 31) gave a speech. During the speech, a confederate performed ambiguous behaviors. After the speech, participants were asked to answer questions about their interpretation of the confederate's behaviors using open-ended questions and rating scales. The results showed that the high socially anxious participants interpreted the confederate's ambiguous behavior in a more negative and threatening manner as measured by the rating scales, and in a less neutral manner as measured by the open-ended responses in comparison to the low socially anxious participants. After controlling for the effects of depression, the effects of social anxiety on the threat rating score remained significant. These results suggest that social anxiety is partially related to threatening interpretations of other's ambiguous behaviors.
Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2007
The current study investigated the tendency of individuals with high levels of social anxiety to interpret ambiguous facial expressions in a threatening manner. Results obtained from self-report measures were consistent with previous studies in which highly socially anxious individuals endorsed threatening interpretations for ambiguous social information. More importantly, highly socially anxious participants showed relative facilitation of processing of threatening faces following neutral faces when a priming technique was used to eliminate artifact due to response selection bias. These findings support the hypothesized social anxiety-linked interpretive bias. r
Interpretation and Judgmental Biases in Socially Anxious and Nonanxious Individuals
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2006
Interpretation and judgmental biases for threat-relevant stimuli are thought to play a role in anxiety disorders. To investigate whether social anxiety is associated with interpretation and judgmental biases for unambiguous external social events, individuals high and low in social anxiety (N = 36 per group) were presented with unambiguous scenarios depicting positive and mildly negative social events. Interpretations were assessed by participants' answers to open-ended questions and by their ratings for experimenter-provided, alternative explanations. In addition, for each event, participants indicated the probability that the event would happen to them and estimated their own emotional reaction to it. Compared to low socially anxious group, individuals high in social anxiety were more likely to interpret positive social events in a negative way and to catastrophize in response to unambiguous, mildly negative social events. Also, they estimated the emotional cost of negative social events as higher and the probabilities of positive social events as lower.
Facilitating a benign interpretation bias in a high socially anxious population
Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2007
Previous research has shown that high socially anxious individuals lack the benign interpretation bias present in people without social anxiety. The tendency of high socially anxious people to generate more negative interpretations may lead to anticipated anxiety about future social situations. If so, developing a more benign interpretation bias could lead to a reduction in this anxiety. The current study showed that a benign interpretation bias could be facilitated (or 'trained') in a high socially anxious population. Participants in the benign training groups had repeated practice in accessing benign (positive or non-negative) interpretations of potentially threatening social scenarios. Participants in the control condition were presented with the same social scenarios but without their outcomes being specified. In a later recognition task, participants who received benign interpretation training generated more benign, and less negative, interpretations of new ambiguous social situations compared to the control group. Participants who received benign training also predicted that they would be significantly less anxious in a future social situation than those in the control group. Possible implications of the findings for therapeutic interventions in social phobia are discussed. r
Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2009
We report on an experimental manipulation of interpretation bias in socially anxious youths. A non-clinical sample of 10–11-year-olds selected for high social anxiety was trained over three sessions to endorse benign rather than negative interpretations of potentially threatening social scenarios. This group was subsequently less likely to endorse negative interpretations of new ambiguous social situations than children in a test–retest condition. Children who received interpretation training also showed reduced trait social anxiety and reported significantly less anxiety about an anticipated interpersonal encounter, compared with the control group.
Interpretation of facial expressions and social anxiety: Specificity and source of biases
Cognition & Emotion, 2008
The current study assessed the processing of facial displays of emotion (Happy, Disgust, and Neutral) of varying emotional intensities in participants with high vs. low social anxiety. Use of facial expressions of varying intensities allowed for strong external validity and a fine-grained analysis of interpretation biases. Sensitivity to perceiving negative evaluation in faces (i.e., emotion detection) was assessed at both long (unlimited) and brief (60 ms) stimulus durations. In addition, ratings of perceived social cost were made indicating what participants judged it would be like to have a social interaction with a person exhibiting the stimulus emotion. Results suggest that high social anxiety participants did not demonstrate biases in their sensitivity to perceiving negative evaluation (i.e. disgust) in facial expressions. However, high social anxiety participants did estimate the perceived cost of interacting with someone showing disgust to be significantly greater than low social anxiety participants, regardless of the intensity of the disgust expression. These results are consistent with a specific type of interpretation bias in which participants with social anxiety have elevated ratings of the social cost of interacting with individuals displaying negative evaluation. r
Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2013
Cognitive theories of social anxiety indicate that negative cognitive biases play a key role in causing and maintaining social anxiety. On the basis of these cognitive theories, laboratory-based research has shown that individuals with social anxiety exhibit negative interpretation biases of ambiguous social situations. Cognitive Bias Modification for interpretative biases (CBM-I) has emerged from this basic science research to modify negative interpretative biases in social anxiety and reduce emotional vulnerability and social anxiety symptoms. However, it is not yet clear if modifying interpretation biases via CBM will have any enduring effect on social anxiety symptoms or improve social functioning. The aim of this paper is to review the relevant literature on interpretation biases in social anxiety and discuss important implications of CBM-I method for clinical practice and research.
Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2007
The current study assessed the processing of facial displays of emotion (Happy, Disgust, and Neutral) of varying emotional intensities in participants with high vs. low social anxiety. Use of facial expressions of varying intensities allowed for strong external validity and a fine-grained analysis of interpretation biases. Sensitivity to perceiving negative evaluation in faces (i.e., emotion detection) was assessed at both long (unlimited) and brief (60 ms) stimulus durations. In addition, ratings of perceived social cost were made indicating what participants judged it would be like to have a social interaction with a person exhibiting the stimulus emotion. Results suggest that high social anxiety participants did not demonstrate biases in their sensitivity to perceiving negative evaluation (i.e. disgust) in facial expressions. However, high social anxiety participants did estimate the perceived cost of interacting with someone showing disgust to be significantly greater than low social anxiety participants, regardless of the intensity of the disgust expression. These results are consistent with a specific type of interpretation bias in which participants with social anxiety have elevated ratings of the social cost of interacting with individuals displaying negative evaluation. r
2011
The present article reports two experiments suggesting that the presentation time of an emotional facial expression can influence interpretations in an analogue sample for social anxiety. Participants scoring high and low on the Fear of Negative Evaluation questionnaire (high and low social-anxiety group) were instructed to observe photographs of negative, positive and neutral faces presented at two exposure durations: 200 and 500 ms. Overall, it was found that high socially anxious individuals rated all emotional faces as appearing more critical of them, compared with the low social anxiety group. Additionally, both social anxiety groups interpreted the negative faces as less negative at 500 ms than at 200 ms presentation time. Finally, high levels of trait anxiety and depression were associated with increased negative ratings of facial expressions. Implications for treatment interventions and limitations of the results are discussed.