Beyond The Looking-Glass: Some Thoughts On Sociopolitics And Reflexivity In Australian Archaeology (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Social Archaeology of Australian Indigenous Societies
2006
Building on the foundational work of Harry Lourandos, the book critically examines and challenges traditional approaches which have presented Indigenous Australian pasts as static and tethered to ecological rationalism. The book reveals the ancient past of Aboriginal Australians to be one of long-term changes in social relationships and traditions, as well as the active management and manipulation of the environment. It encourages a deeper appreciation of the ways Aboriginal peoples have engaged with, and constructed their worlds. It solicits a deeper understanding of the contemporary political and social context of research and the insidious impacts of colonialist philosophies. In short, it concerns people: both past and present. Ultimately, The social archaeology of Australian Indigenous societies looks beyond the stereotype of Aboriginal peoples as ‘hunter-gatherers’ and charts new and challenging agendas for Australian Aboriginal archaeology.
The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Indigenous Australia and New Guinea, 2021
Most histories of Australian archaeology written in the past three decades imagine that the discipline came of age in (approximately) the year 1960. We are led to believe that systematic archaeological research, nuanced interpretations, and advocacy for the conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage all date to the post-1960 era. Yet archaeological research in Australia has a lengthier and more complex genealogy. Here we use a series of case studies to explore the gradual development of the discipline during the twentieth century. We unpack key moments and projects during the early-to-mid twentieth century and examine the extent to which the so-called "professional" archaeologists of the 1960s overlapped with and depended upon the work of "amateur" scholars. We conclude by suggesting that the period of most rapid and significant change in archaeological thought and practice was precipitated by Aboriginal activism in the 1980s. Australia's First Peoples demanded control of research into their cultural heritage, a project which is ongoing today. Our discipline must encourage a culture of reflexivity on its current practices by coming to terms with rather than silencing its history (whether good, bad, or ugly).
The intersections of Sacredness and Archaeology, 2024
Archaeological evidence from Western Australia provides us with the earliest indication of Aboriginal occupation back to more than 50,000 years ago. Yet, ancient dates are not only of interest to archaeologists but also to Aboriginal Australians today in the post-native title era, where antiquity affords a sense of authenticity and belonging. While academic discourse and scientific methods bring validity to archaeological evidence, the concept of time is a different thing altogether to Aboriginal people who associate the starting point of mountains, animals, plants, waters, rock paintings, and other features of the landscape to the Dreamtime cosmology – a highly complex cultural concept that refers to an immemorial time also thriving in the present, an era “in and through time,” according to some authors. These places of cultural significance have different values, and some have more elements of restrictive knowledge than others. Like many other First Nations worldwide, Aboriginal Australians have faced the destruction of their cultural and sacred places. Sacredness is a malleable concept according to different perceptions, contexts, and interests, especially economic. Discussed here are examples where Aboriginal places of cultural significance have been challenged and unrecognized. Also, the role of archaeology in the creation of new paradigms and the actions that are taking place in Western Australia to create a more integrative archaeological practice of Indigenous knowledge and values.
Sharing the Past: Aboriginal influence on archaeological practice, a case study from New South Wales
Aboriginal demands of researchers in the last decade for control, accountability and information have influenced the way we approach archaeology in a number of ways. In this article I offer just two examples of this. First I will discuss the way in which Aboriginal epistemological perceptions of their past have led me to abandon the term prehistory and to seek models for siting my work that embrace both the historic and prehistoric perspective. Second, I will discuss my response to Aboriginal requests for information from scientists and the way in which community reports form part of a model for research based on the interests of both archaeologists and Aborigines, and on the goals of collaborative assessment.