Doğal Afetler Research Papers - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Bu araştırma, Türkiye’de doğal afetler üzerine yapılmış lisansüstü tez çalışmalarının analizini yapmak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada nitel araştırma modeline dayalı doküman analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırmada... more

Bu araştırma, Türkiye’de doğal afetler üzerine yapılmış lisansüstü tez çalışmalarının analizini yapmak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada nitel araştırma modeline dayalı doküman analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırmada doküman analizi yöntemi genel tarama (literatür tarama) yapmak amacıyla seçilmiştir. Araştırmanın kapsamını, 2000-2017 yılları arasında yapılan yüksek lisans ve doktora tezleri oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama sürecinde literatür taramasından yararlanılmıştır. Araştırmada literatür taramasıyla elde edilen 48 yüksek lisans ve 12 doktora tez çalışması değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında incelenen tezler; cinsiyete, yıllara, üniversitelere, enstitülere, anabilim dallarına, danışmanlarına, erişim durumlarına ve konu alanlarına göre içerik analizi yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada doğal afetler ile ilgili olarak yapılan tezlerin sayıca çok olduğu ve büyük çoğunluğunun da yüksek lisans düzeyinde olduğu varılan sonuçlardandır. Araştırmada doğal afetler ile ilgili tezlerin yüzde sekseninin 2002-2015 yılları arasında yapıldığı görülmüştür. İncelenen tezlerde Türkiye’nin köklü üniversitelerinden Marmara Üniversitesi, Gazi Üniversitesi, İstanbul Üniversitesi ve Ankara Üniversitesi’nin ön plana çıkması varılan bir başka sonuçtur. Yüksek lisans ve doktora tezlerinde Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü’nün diğer enstitülere göre, Kamu Yönetimi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Tarih anabilim dallarının ise diğer anabilim dallarına göre önde olması ve tez türü danışmanlıkların çoğunluğunun profesör düzeyinde olması da ulaşılan sonuçlardandır. Araştırmada hazırlanan tezlerin büyük çoğunluğunun erişime açık olduğu görülmüştür. Yine hazırlanan tezlerde konu çeşitliliği olmakla beraber Kamu Yönetimi, Eğitim ve Öğretim, Coğrafya, İşletme ve Bilgisayar Mühendisliği konularının daha yaygın olduğu görülmüştür. Araştırmada doğal afetlere dair yurtdışında yapılmış tezlerle ilgili karşılaştırmalı çalışmalar yapılabileceği bir öneri olarak sunulmuştur.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Doğal afet, doküman analizi, lisansüstü tez.

A STUDY ABOUT THE GRADUATE THESES CONDUCTED ON NATURAL DISASTERS IN TURKEY (2000-2017)

ABSTRACT
This research was carried out to analyze the graduate thesis studies on the natural disasters in Turkey. A document analysis method based on qualitative research model was used in the research. In this study, the document analysis model was selected for general screening (literature survey). The scope of the research consists of master’s and doctoral theses conducted between 2000-2017. Literature survey was used in the data collection process. In the study, 48 master's and 12 doctoral theses which were obtained by literature review were evaluated. The theses examined in the research; sex, years, universities, institutes, branches of education, consultants, access status and subject areas were analyzed by content analysis method. In the research, it is concluded that there are a great number of theses related to natural disasters and most of them are at the graduate level. In the research, it was seen that eighty percent of the theses about the natural disasters have been made between the years 2002-2015. In the theses examined, Marmara, Gazi, İstanbul and Ankara Universities, which are the most well-known universities of Turkey stand outed. In master's and doctoral theses examined, the fact that the Institute of Social Sciences is ahead of the other institutes, that public administration, political science and history departments is ahead of other departments, and the majority of the thesis type consultancy are at the professor level is another result. In the research, it will be seen that the large majority of the theses prepared are open to access. Although there are a variety of subjects in the theses prepared, it is seen that Public Administration, Education and Teaching, Geography, Business Administration and Computer Engineering are more common. In the research, it has been recommended comparative studies can be made about natural disaster theses made abroad.

STRUCTURED ABSTRACT
Introduction
Natural disasters have affected all humanity since the existence of the Earth as events that cause great harm to people and the environment. It is not known when and where all these natural disasters will occur, and natural disasters can occur anytime, anywhere (Soydan and Alpaslan, 2014: 54). Atalay (2004: 118) defined that natural disaster are events that sometimes will causing loss of life and property, will occur by natural processes outside the human such as earthquake, volcanism, avalanche, flood, frost, drought and mass movements. In the historical process, we can list natural disasters that cause deaths of people with destructive and harmful effects, as nature events such as earthquakes, landslides, volcanic eruptions, tsunami, storm, severe weather conditions, river floods, flooding, mass movements (landslides, rock fall, sludge flow, debris flow, lava flow and rock avalanches, etc.) hot wave, cold wave, wildfire, drought (Sever, 2018: 68).
Natural disasters occurred in different parts of the world at different times as unusual movements and attracted the attention of human beings throughout history. The most important reason for this interest is that natural disasters cause important consequences for human beings such as loss of life and property. In addition, with the increase of written and visual mass media, the fact that natural disaster on one side of the world is known and followed by people on the other end has increased the interest in these events. However, with the impact of globalization, the economic impacts of natural disasters anywhere in the world can cross the borders of the country and affect people in very remote countries. These reasons, which are generally emphasized, have made it inevitable to examine all aspects of natural disasters scientifically. Many studies have been conducted on natural disasters in many science and social sciences from geology to meteorology, from psychology to economy (Akar, 2013: 186). In the literature, we see many studies that examine natural disasters in Turkey with different dimensions (Akar, 2013; Bayram and Güler, 2016; Cin, 2010; Değirmenci and İlter, 2013; Demir and Aktaş, 2008; Ergünay, 2009; Ersoy, 2016; Genç, 2007; İçel, 2014; Kızıloğlu, Okuroğlu and Örüng, 2006; Küçükcan, 2008; Özgen, Ünaldı and Bindak, 2011; Özşahin, 2013; Sipahioğlu, 2012; Soydan and Alpaslan, 2014; Tokcan and Yiter, 2017; Turan and Kartal, 2012, Uzunçıbuk, 2009; Yavaş, 2001).
The rapid increase in the number of universities in Turkey has contributed to postgraduate education development orientation. Accordingly, a quantitative increase in scientific research in various fields has started. The theses prepared especially in the graduate education level made the greatest contribution to this numerical increase (Güven and Özçelik, 2017: 697). Today, this increase makes it difficult for the researchers’ work who will make new studies to determine the general appearance and tendency in such studies that increased quantitatively. In this respect, it is very important that examined, interpreted, evaluated, be systematically handled from a holistic perspective the studies conducted in a specific field, in terms of guiding researchers in future (Kahyaoğlu, 2016a: 51). The examination of scientific theses in a field can tell us the general framework, depth and prevalence of that field, and which topics are discussed, can give us a portrait of that area (Özbey and Şama, 2017: 214; Karadağ, 2009: 76). For these reasons, it is important to conduct studies examining graduate theses. There are many studies examining all or some of the graduate theses that carried out in different fields within different institutions in higher education institutions in Turkey (Ayaz, Behçet and Söylemez, 2015; Değirmençay and Cin, 2016; Doğru, Gençosman, Ataalkın and Şeker, 2012; Erdoğmuş and Çağıltay, 2009; Geçit and Şeyihoğlu, 2011; Güven, et. al., 2014; Güven and Özçelik, 2017; Kahyaoğlu, 2016a; Kahyaoğlu, 2016b; Karadağ, 2009; Karkın, 2011;