Mailing Lists Research Papers - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Dear Mr. Gonzalez: Thank you for your email of August 8, 2017, wherein you requested an update regarding the matter. Please review the attached letter to New York Attorney General’s Office dated May 15, 2017, along with the receipt of... more

Dear Mr. Gonzalez:

Thank you for your email of August 8, 2017, wherein you requested an update regarding the matter. Please review the attached letter to New York Attorney General’s Office dated May 15, 2017, along with the receipt of mailing photocopied thereto. Unfortunately, the parcel never reached the Attorney General because, according to employees at the US Postal Service, the parcel was intercepted, removed, and/or otherwise purged from the federal mail facility. Stated more succinctly, the odds are that an employee saw to it that the parcel was neither delivered to the Attorney General’s Office nor preserved for future delivery or return to me.

As you know, the claims raised in this lawsuit reveal widespread disorder precipitated by representatives of local, state, and federal institutions, resulting in systematic deprivations of basic and fundamental constitutional rights. The fact that you have reached out to me is encouraging, being that Article III authorizes, nay requires, the District Court to take action despite purported electronic filing system errors. Surely, the justification for the continued abuses outlined in the complaint could not be due to any sort of filing error notification or computer malfunction when visiting the Court’s website.

As you will observe from the balance of the attachments hereto, we are documenting each and every instance of corruption that we can, toward the end of restoring order, as people are assaulted daily by rackets having found a foothold in selected government institutions. These outrages are progressing daily, whereby there is a general crisis of disorder that threatens every class of Americans, all of whom presently realize no cognizable recourse and are forced to live in the United States without the guarantees that we all are entitled to.

In light of the circumstances outlined in the amended complaint, I would ask you take a very close look at it, and confer with the assigned Judge to formulate a plan for halting the current abuses and preventing further abuses during the pendency of the Attorney General filing his responsive pleading. If there are any doubts as to what authority the Court has, just let me know and you can count on the plaintiff Brian King, Jr., a former federal law clerk in the Seventh Circuit, to provide you a report and recommendation, in which he can explain not only the powers of Article III courts under such circumstances, but also the specific obligations of Article III officers now that those circumstances have come to the District Court’s attention.

We all took an oath to support and defend the US Constitution, duly enacted and ratified almost 240 years ago, and I applaud you for recognizing that it could not depend for enforcement upon fussy data-entry prompts on CM/ECF or Pacer. To be sure, the matters at hand cannot and will not be resolved by gamesmanship, sophistry, personality contests, or any other form of adversarialism, but will instead be rectified by dialectical collaboration between duty-bound sworn officers of our Nation’s Supreme Law, all unified in diligent resolve.

I thank you for your vigilance and I hope you will inspire your colleagues to match our collaborative efforts.

Sincerely, Edward G. Eiseman, Esq.