Ostrogoths Research Papers - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

The book presents a semiotic approach to the study of power relations in the symbolic space of medieval culture.
A critical analysis of medieval texts was carried out in accordance with the methodology of European structuralist and poststructuralist tradition (Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, Umberto Eco, Jean Baudrillard), as well as Russian semiotic tradition (Mikhail Bakhtin, Juri Stepanov, Juri Lotman, Boris Uspensky, Viktor Toporov, Sergei Proskurin).
The author analyzes the early medieval historical works of Jordanes, Gregory of Tours, Bede the Venerable, Paul the Deacon, Snorri Sturluson and other authors. The book raises questions of the realiation of the plot of teratomachia (Greek “fight against monsters”) in political culture. The murder of a monster becomes a kind of initiation of an archetypal Hero (for example, such as Theseus, Perseus, Sigurd, Beowulf, etc.), who manifests his individuality and strengthens his authority as a military leader or potential ruler through the victory over the monster. Formation of the comitatus culture and rising power of military leaders is associated with the development of ideas about the kinship of military aristocracy with the world of monsters, which is reflected in the representation of royal power.
The semiotics of power in archaic Germanic culture is identified as being of a physiological nature - the signs of power are represented by various aspects of the ruler’s body, both innate and acquired as a result of certain ritual practices, such as long hair or characteristic features of the body of representatives of the ruling Merovingian family. Such phenomena are explained through the prism of the “quasi-bodily” code of archaic culture. The psychological aspects of the perception of the physiological aspects of power are analyzed through the prism of the methodology of S. Freud, A. Adler and E. Berne.
The formation of medieval culture is considered from the point of view of the transformation of the perception of symbolic structures and the development of the practice of symbolic representation in the space of political communication. The author analyzes semiotic aspects of overcoming physiological limitations and weakening the biological relevance of power, which took place in the form of ideas about the transfer of charisma through the things of the ruler, transmitted within the framework of symbolic redistribution and the medieval gift economy.
In accordance with the methodology of K. Jung, J. Campbell and E. Meletinsky, the archetypes underlying the perception of power in medieval literature (Hero, Wise old man, Father, Shadow, Seeker, Child, etc.) are analyzed.
The author examines the methods of forming political myths in the works of intellectuals of the late antiquity - Flavius Cassiodorus, Severinus Boethius, Isidore of Seville, in particular, myths concerning the categories of equality and freedom. The medieval perception of the “barbarian” world is considered in accordance with the methodology of the Moscow-Tartu semiotic school from the point of view of the dynamics of the processes of semiosphere - the interaction of the cultural core, periphery and border space of the era of late Antiquity and the early Middle Ages.