Bringing the State Police In: The Diffusion of U.S. Statewide Policing Agencies, 1905–1941 | Studies in American Political Development | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Policing is a prominent but understudied part of American politics. This article asks: Why did some, but not all, American states adopt a state police force in the early twentieth century? The state police force—a statewide policing agency with general jurisdiction over crimes throughout a state—was a prized progressive policy reform for decades. Yet many states declined to adopt the innovation. That puzzle becomes even more interesting given that all forty-eight states adopted the closely related innovation of a state highway patrol during the same period. This article applies diffusion theory to explain the origins of a familiar feature of American policing. Using a multimethod research design, I found that labor-capital struggles and regional pressures for diffusion were most important in shaping the adoption of state police forces. By contrast, adoptions of highway patrols appear to have been influenced by factors such as urbanization and fiscal capacity.

References

  1. A “state police force” is an agency that has the legal authority and the routinely funded, practiced ability to enforce laws throughout a state. A “state highway patrol,” by contrast, refers to an agency that is limited either in its legal authority or routine bureaucratic practice to enforcing only or almost exclusively highway regulations and traffic laws.

  2. Weaver, Vesla M., “Frontlash: Race and the Development of Punitive Crime Policy,” Studies in American Political Development 21, no. 2 (2007): 230–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gottschalk, Marie, “Hiding in Plain Sight: American Politics and the Carceral State,” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008): 235–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fortner, Michael Javen, “The Carceral State and the Crucible of Black Politics: An Urban History of the Rockefeller Drug Laws,” Studies in American Political Development 27, no. 1 (2013): 14–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  3. A recent exception is Seo, Sarah A., Policing the Open Road: How Cars Transformed American Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  4. Hamelin, Fabrice and Spenlehauer, Vincent, “Road Policing as a State Tool: Learning from a Socio-Historical Analysis of the California Highway Patrol,” Policing and Society 16, no. 3 (September 2006): 261–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Falcone, David N., “The Missouri State Highway Patrol as a Representative Model,” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 24, no. 4 (2001): 585–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bechtel, H. K., State Police in the United States: A Socio-Historical Analysis (Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood, 1995)Google Scholar; Falcone, David N., “The Illinois State Police as an Archetypal Model,” Police Quarterly 1, no. 3 (September 1, 1998): 61–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1177/109861119800100305; Lindsey, M. G., “Localism and the Creation of a State Police in Arkansas,” The Arkansas Historical Quarterly 64, no. 4 (2005): 353–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ray, Gerda W., “From Cossack to Trooper: Manliness, Police Reform, and the State,” Journal of Social History 28, no. 3 (1995): 565–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ray, Gerda W., “‘We Can Stay Until Hell Freezes Over’: Strike Control and the State Police in New York, 1919–1923,” Labor History 36, no. 3 (1995): 403–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  5. Karch, Andrew, Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion among the American States (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rogers, Everett M., Diffusion of Innovation, 5th ed. (New York: The Free Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Frances Stokes Berry and William D. Berry, “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis,” The American Political Science Review, 1990, 395–415; Walker, Jack L., “Diffusion of Innovations among the American States,” American Political Science Review 63, no. 3 (September 1969): 880–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gilardi, Fabrizio, “Four Ways We Can Improve Policy Diffusion Research,” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16, no. 1 (October 9, 2015): 8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440015608761.

  6. Even some excellent recent work focuses mostly on the 1930s; Rodems, Richard and Shaefer, H. Luke, “Left Out: Policy Diffusion and the Exclusion of Black Workers from Unemployment Insurance,” Social Science History 40, no. 3 (2016): 385–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  7. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovation; Karch, Andrew, Nicholson-Crotty, Sean C., and Woods, Neal D., “Policy Diffusion and the Pro-Innovation Bias,” Political Research Quarterly 69, no. 1 (January 7, 2016): 83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915622289.

  8. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovation, 5–6.

  9. Karch, Democratic Laboratories, 2.

  10. Elkins, Zachary and Simmons, Beth, “On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598, no. 1 (2005): 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shipan, Charles R. and Volden, Craig, “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion,” American Journal of Political Science 52, no. 4 (2008): 840–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  11. Walker, “Diffusion of Innovations among the American States”; Boehmke, Frederick J. and Skinner, Paul, “State Policy Innovativeness Revisited,” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12, no. 3 (May 30, 2012): 303–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440012438890; Balla, Steven J., “Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations,” American Politics Research 29, no. 3 (2001): 221CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mintrom, Michael and Vergari, Sandra, “Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms,” Journal of Politics 60, no. 1 (1998): 126–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Karch, Democratic Laboratories; Volden, Craig, “States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children's Health Insurance Program,” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 2 (2006): 294–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Makse, Todd and Volden, Craig, “The Role of Policy Attributes in the Diffusion of Innovations,” Journal of Politics 73, no. 1 (January 2011): 108–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  12. Smith, Bruce, “Factors Influencing the Future Development of State Police,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 23, no. 4 (December 1932)Google Scholar; Smith, Bruce, The State Police (New York: Macmillan, 1925)Google Scholar; Vollmer, August and Parker, Alfred E., Crime and the State Police (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1935)Google Scholar; Vollmer, August, “Police Progress in the Past Twenty-Five Years,” American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology 24 (1933): 161Google Scholar.

  13. Moley, Raymond, “The Sheriff and the Constable,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 146, no. 1 (1929): 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  14. Mayo, Katherine, Justice to All: The Story of the Pennsylvania State Police (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1920), 25Google Scholar.

  15. Vollmer, “Police Progress in the Past Twenty-Five Years”; Hamelin and Spenlehauer, “Road Policing as a State Tool.”

  16. Smith, The State Police, 43; Vollmer and Parker, Crime and the State Police.

  17. Vollmer and Parker, Crime and the State Police, 25.

  18. Ray, “From Cossack to Trooper.”

  19. Ray, “‘We Can Stay Until Hell Freezes Over.’”

  20. Rich, Bennett M. and Burch, Philip H., “The Changing Role of the National Guard,” American Political Science Review 50, no. 3 (1956): 702–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.2307/1951553; Weiss, Robert P., “Private Detective Agencies and Labour Discipline in the United States, 1855–1946,” The Historical Journal 29, no. 1 (1986): 87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Roosevelt, Theodore, “Foreword,” in Justice to All: The Story of the Pennsylvania State Police (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1920), xxiii–xxviiGoogle Scholar; “The State Police,” The Nation, April 11, 1923, 404; “The Question of State Police,” editorial, The New Republic, April 1, 1916, 230–31.

  21. Loomis, Erik, A History of America in Ten Strikes (New York: The New Press, 2018), 71–90Google Scholar.

  22. Roosevelt, “Foreword,” xxvi.

  23. Smith, “Factors Influencing the Future Development of State Police”; Puttkammer, Ernst W., “The Organization of a State Police,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1931–1951) 26, no. 5 (1936): 727–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cooper, Weldon, “The State Police Movement in the South,” The Journal of Politics 1, no. 4 (November 1939): 414–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Torres, Donald A., Handbook of State Police, Highway Patrols, and Investigative Agencies (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1987)Google Scholar; Bechtel, State Police in the United States; Vollmer and Parker, Crime and the State Police.

  24. Frederick J. Boehmke, Mark Brockway, Bruce Desmarais, Jeffrey J. Harden, Scott LaCombe, Fridolin Linder, and Hanna Wallach, “State Policy Innovation and Diffusion (SPID) Database v1.0” (Harvard Dataverse, 2018), https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CVYSR7; Walker, “Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.”

  25. Torres, Handbook of State Police, 260; Smith, The State Police, 83.

  26. There were earlier statewide agencies during the nineteenth century, but these were not state police agencies as contemporaries recognized. Smith, The State Police, 34–39. A Massachusetts State Police was created in 1865, for instance, but its duties and personnel were severely limited (Torres, Handbook of State Police, 166.) and it was not until 1921 that a successor agency was enlarged to serve as the commonwealth's primary uniformed branch responsible for statewide law enforcement. Similarly, Texas created a Texas State Police in 1870 during a Reconstruction government, but the end of Reconstruction led to that force's replacement by the Texas Rangers, whose portfolio mainly included border security and cattle rustling rather than law enforcement Ben H. Procter, “Texas Rangers,” Texas State Historical Association, June 15, 2010, https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/met04. I do not include these as “state police forces” because were irregular or severely restricted in authority (or both), a rule that also excludes state sheriffs, as in an early Nebraska experiment, and other agencies with as few as four officers that could not effectively conduct routine police activities whatever their legal authorities.

  27. Vollmer and Parker, Crime and the State Police, 49–53.

  28. Torres, Handbook of State Police.

  29. David Card, “Origins of the Unemployment Rate: The Lasting Legacy of Measurement without Theory” (unpublished manuscript, February 2011).

  30. Rosen, Lawrence, “The Creation of the Uniform Crime Report: The Role of Social Science,” Social Science History 19, no. 2 (1995): 215–38Google Scholar.

  31. Landefeld, J. Steven, “GDP: One of the Great Inventions of the 20th Century,” Survey of Current Business 80, no. 1 (2000): 6–14Google Scholar.

  32. Smith, The State Police, 11.

  33. Weaver, Michael, “‘Judge Lynch’ in the Court of Public Opinion: Publicity and the De-Legitimation of Lynching,” American Political Science Review 113, no. 2 (2019): 293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  34. “Forgotten Los Angeles History: The Chinese Massacre of 1871,” accessed October 10, 2019, https://www.lapl.org/collections-resources/blogs/lapl/chinese-massacre-1871; Madison, James, A Lynching in the Heartland: Race and Memory in America (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)Google Scholar; Clarke, James W., “Without Fear or Shame: Lynching, Capital Punishment and the Subculture of Violence in the American South,” British Journal of Political Science 28, no. 2 (1998): 269–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  35. Seguin, Charles and Rigby, David, “National Crimes: A New National Data Set of Lynchings in the United States, 1883 to 1941,” Socius 5 (2019): 2378023119841780Google Scholar; Tolnay, Stewart Emory and Beck, Elwood M., A Festival of Violence: An Analysis of Southern Lynchings, 1882–1930 (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Beck, E. M. and Tolnay, Stewart Emory, Inventory of Southern Lynch Victims (Athens: University of Georgia, 2019)Google Scholar.

  36. Myrdal, Gunnar, An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1996)Google Scholar.

  37. Eckberg, Douglas, “Estimates of Early Twentieth-Century U.S. Homicide Rates: An Econometric Forecasting Approach,” Demography 32, no. 1 (1995): 1–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

  38. America Adopts the Automobile, 1895–1910 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1970)Google Scholar.

  39. Fishback, Price V. and Kantor, Shawn Everett, A Prelude to the Welfare State: The Origins of Workers’ Compensation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007)Google Scholar.

  40. Peterson, Florence, Strikes in the United States, 1880–1936 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, August 1937), 2Google Scholar.

  41. Walker, “Diffusion of Innovations among the American States”; Boehmke and Skinner, “State Policy Innovativeness Revisited”; Rogers, Diffusion of Innovation, 267–97.

  42. Gilardi, “Four Ways We Can Improve Policy Diffusion Research.”

  43. Desmarais, Bruce A., Harden, Jeffrey J., and Boehmke, Frederick J., “Persistent Policy Pathways: Inferring Diffusion Networks in the American States,” American Political Science Review 109, no. 2 (2015): 392–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  44. Turner, Frederick Jackson, The Significance of Sections in American History (Boston, MA: Henry Holt, 1932)Google Scholar; Walker, “Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.”

  45. Mooney, Christopher Z., “Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion,” Political Research Quarterly 54, no. 1 (2001): 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  46. Berry and Berry, “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations,” 404.

  47. For further criticisms, Mooney, “Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion,” 106–107.

  48. Cooper, “The State Police Movement in the South.”

  49. Gilardi, “Four Ways We Can Improve Policy Diffusion Research.”

  50. M. Watt Espy and John Ortiz Smykla, “Executions in the United States, 1608–2002: The ESPY File” (ICPSR 8451, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2016), https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08451.v5.

  51. Dubin, Michael J., Party Affiliations in the State Legislatures: A Year by Year Summary, 1796–2006 (McFarland, 2007)Google Scholar.

  52. Miron, Jeffrey A., “Violence and the U.S. Prohibitions of Drugs and Alcohol,” American Law and Economics Review 1, no. 1/2 (Fall 1999): 78–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  53. Carter, David B. and Signorino, Curtis S., “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data,” Political Analysis 18, no. 3 (2010): 271–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  54. Boehmke, Frederick J. and Witmer, Richard, “Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion,” Political Research Quarterly 57, no. 1 (2004): 39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  55. Berry and Berry, “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations.”

  56. Gitelman, “Perspectives on American Industrial Violence”; Weiss, “Private Detective Agencies and Labour Discipline”; Ray, “‘We Can Stay Until Hell Freezes Over.’”

  57. Industrial Relations: Final Report and Testimony Submitted to Congress by the Commission on Industrial Relations Created by the Act of August 23, 1912, vol. 1 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1916), 97–98Google Scholar.

  58. Lovin, Hugh T., “Idaho and the ‘Reds’ 1919–1926,” The Pacific Northwest Quarterly 69, no. 3 (1978): 108Google Scholar.

  59. Dawson, Edgar, “New York State Police,” American Political Science Review 11, no. 3 (August 1917): 539–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

  60. Quoted in “Menacing the State Constabulary” [Editorial], Industry: A Semi-Monthly Interpretation of Industrial Process (January 15, 1919): 7.

  61. Bechtel, State Police in the United States.

  62. Falcone, “The Missouri State Highway Patrol.”

  63. Cooper, “The State Police Movement in the South.”

  64. Falcone, “Missouri State Highway Patrol.”

  65. Smith, “Factors Influencing the Future Development of State Police,” 715.