EFF Pushes Back Against State Law Copyright Expansion in California (original) (raw)

Yesterday, EFF filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, pushing back against a district court decision that expanded state law copyrights in pre-1972 sound recordings. This may sound familiar: we recently filed a similar brief in the Second Circuit. In both cases, a company called Flo & Eddie has convinced district courts that state copyright law restricts public performances of pre-1972 sound recordings, even though such a restriction has never before been recognized. As we explained in our previous post, these cases arise out of a quirk of copyright that leaves pre-1972 sound recordings out of the reach of federal law, allowing the states to set copyright rules.

Flo & Eddie is made up of two members of the band the Turtles. Their arguments regarding state law copyright are extremely dangerous. For example, Flo & Eddie recently argued to the Eleventh Circuit that sound recordings are entitled to state law copyright that gives Flo & Eddie ownership rights to stop “all unauthorized uses of those performances.”

Flo & Eddie’s argument, if accepted, would seemingly allow Flo & Eddie to prevent any use of a sound recording that it didn’t like—not just public performances—regardless of the First Amendment or fair use principles. Law professors and other public interest groups also pointed out other consequences in other friend-of-the-court briefs submitted to the Ninth Circuit.

This is just one case in a larger effort by Flo & Eddie and others in the recorded music business to push through the courts what the legislatures have never given them. Whether (or how) we should recognize public performance rights in sound recordings are questions that are best left to Congress to answer, not the courts.

All of the briefs filed in the Ninth Circuit appeal thus far can be found here:

Defendant-Appellant's Brief:

Amicus Briefs:

Join EFF Lists

The Climate Has a Posse – And So Does Political Satire

Greenwashing is a well-worn strategy to try to convince the public that environmentally damaging activities aren’t so damaging after all. It can be very successful precisely because most of us don’t realize it’s happening.Enter the Yes Men, skilled activists who specialize in elaborate pranks that call attention to corporate...

Podcast Episode: AI on the Artist's Palette

Collaging, remixing, sampling—art always has been more than the sum of its parts, a synthesis of elements and ideas that produces something new and thought-provoking. Technology has enabled and advanced this enormously, letting us access and manipulate information and images in ways that would’ve been unimaginable just a few decades...

Fair Use Still Protects Histories and Documentaries—Even Tiger King

Copyright’s fair use doctrine protects lots of important free expression against the threat of ruinous lawsuits. Fair use isn’t limited to political commentary or erudite works – it also protects popular entertainment like Tiger King, Netflix’s hit 2020 documentary series about the bizarre and sometimes criminal exploits of a group...

Congress Should Just Say No to NO FAKES

There is a lot of anxiety around the use of generative artificial intelligence, some of it justified. But it seems like Congress thinks the highest priority is to protect celebrities – living or dead. Never fear, ghosts of the famous and infamous, the U.S Senate is on it. We’ve already...

Making the Law Accessible in Europe and the USA

Special thanks to EFF legal intern Alissa Johnson, who was the lead author of this post. Earlier this month, the European Union Court of Justice ruled that harmonized standards are a part of EU law, and thus must be accessible to EU citizens and residents free of charge.While it...