DIGITAL RIGHTS (original) (raw)

Digital Rights + Internet Governance + Innovation Policy

Freedom of Expression | Privacy | Access to Knowledge

DIGITAL RIGHTS

DIGITAL RIGHTSIP Justice2021-07-18T20:41:38+00:00

IP Justice, Chamber of Progress, LGBT Tech Institute Submit Amicus Brief in NetChoice v. Bonta Over California Internet Censorship Law

By Robin Gross|2023-03-27T18:17:37+00:00March 9th, 2023|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Internet Governance, Publications, Uncategorized|Tags: A2K, Access to Knowledge, CDA Section 230, Censorship, Civil Society, Free Expression, Human Rights|

Several tech policy nonprofit organizations filed an amicus brief in the US District Court in Northern California on 1 March 2023 to defend the First Amendment rights of Internet users against California's recently enacted Age Appropriate Design Code Act (AADC). IP Justice, the Chamber of Progress, and the LGBT Tech [...]

IP Justice Joins Coalition of Civil Society and Industry Groups on Amicus Brief to US Supreme Court Advocating Online Free Expression

By Robin Gross|2023-03-22T19:48:04+00:00January 22nd, 2023|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Internet Governance, Publications|Tags: A2K, Access to Knowledge, CDA Section 230, Censorship, Civil Society, Free Expression, Human Rights, US Supreme Court|

A group of seven industry and civil society organizations including IP Justice filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on 19 January 2023 in the case of Gonzalez v. Google, urging the Court to side with Google and uphold Section 230’s existing protection of algorithmic content moderation. The [...]

IP Justice Statement to WIPO General Assembly July 2022

By Robin Gross|2022-08-05T01:06:38+00:00August 5th, 2022|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Publications, WIPO|Tags: A2K, Access to Knowledge, Broadcast Treaty, Copyright, Domain Names, Fair Use, Public Domain, WIPO|

IP Justice submitted the following statement to the 63rd WIPO General Assembly, which was held 14-22 July 2022 in Geneva, Switzerland: IP Justice Statement Issues Raised: Proposed Broadcast Treaty Domain Name & Country Names Issue Intellectual Property Waiver for COVID-19 Vaccines and Medicines IP Justice's Statement at the WIPO 63/GA was [...]

California’s Legal Battle with Net Neutrality

By Robin Gross|2022-05-12T17:24:09+00:00May 12th, 2022|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Publications, Uncategorized|Tags: A2K, Access to Knowledge, California, Censorship, Civil Society, Free Expression, Human Rights, Net Neutrality, USA|

ACA CONNECTS v BONTA: CALIFORNIA’S LEGAL BATTLE WITH NET NEUTRALITY, EXPLAINED By Tanuj Dayal (also available as a .pdf) On January 28, 2022, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (“Ninth Circuit”), in the case of ACA Connects v. Bonta[1], affirmed the decision of [...]

Civil Society and Industry Opposition to SHOP SAFE in the Final COMPETES Legislation

By Robin Gross|2022-05-05T22:21:48+00:00May 5th, 2022|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Publications|Tags: A2K, Access to Knowledge, Civil Society, Fair Use, Free Expression, Intermediary Liability, IPR, Trademarks|

On 3 May 2022, a coalition of 38 civil society organizations, trade associations, and companies wrote to U.S. Congressional leaders to share their collective opposition to H.R. 5374, the Stopping Harmful Offers on Platforms by Screening Against Fakes in E-commerce (SHOP SAFE) Act. IP Justice joined in this diverse coalition [...]

By Robin Gross|2022-04-24T04🔞26+00:00April 22nd, 2022|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Internet Governance, Publications|Tags: CDA Section 230, Censorship, Free Expression|

IP Justice Files Amicus Brief Against Texas’ Social Media Censorship Law in NetChoice, CCIA v. Paxton By Alyssa Aguilar On 7 April 2022, IP Justice filed an Amicus Curiae legal brief in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in support of Plaintiff-Appellee’s, NetChoice, and the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA). In [...]

IP Justice Requests USTR Take Canada Off the Special 301 “Naughty” List

By Robin Gross|2022-03-08T23:16:09+00:00March 8th, 2022|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Publications|Tags: Canada, Copyright, Intermediary Liability, IPR, Section 301, Trade Agreements, Trademarks, USA, USTR|

IP Justice responded to a question posed from the USTR to IP Justice regarding its submission in the 2022 Special 301 Annual Review Process. Specifically, the USTR asked IP Justice to answer: What has changed in the past year that warrants Canada’s removal from the Special 301 List? IP Justice [...]

IP Justice Joins Letter to Congress from 38 Civil Society and Industry Orgs to Raise Concerns About SHOP SAFE Act, Which Threatens to Undermine Free Speech, Innovation, Privacy, and Consumer Choice

By Robin Gross|2022-03-08T18:01:39+00:00March 8th, 2022|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy|Tags: Civil Society, Intermediary Liability, IPR, Privacy, Surveillance, Trademarks, USA|

Read the joint civil society - industry letter on SHOP SAFE Act here. Related: 26 law professors send similar letter on SHOP SAFE Act here.

Misguided INFORM ACT Creates Opportunity to Abuse Competitors in Online Marketplaces

By Robin Gross|2022-02-28T19:52:27+00:00February 28th, 2022|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Publications|Tags: IPR, online marketplaces, Privacy, Trademarks, USA|

Controversial Bill Inserted into COMPETES Act Threatens Privacy Rights and Entry of New Participants By Alyssa Aguilar On October 5, 2021 Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky (IL-09) and Congressman Gus Bilirakis (FL-12) introduced the INFORM (Integrity, Notification, and Fairness in Online Retail Marketplaces for Consumers) Act. This proposed legislation hopes to combat [...]

IP Justice Comment to 2022 USTR Special 301 Annual Review Process

By Robin Gross|2022-02-23T21:16:30+00:00February 7th, 2022|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Publications, TRIPS|Tags: Access to Knowledge, Canada, CDA Section 230, China, Fair Use, Free Expression, Human Rights, Intermediary Liability, IPR, Patents, Public Domain, Saudi Arabia, Section 301, Trade Agreements, Trademarks, TRIPS, USTR|

IP Justice Urges USTR to Consider Broader Policy Goals in Annual “Special 301” Process On 31 January 2022 IP Justice submitted a comment to the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) via its “Special 301” annual review process, which evaluates other countries’ laws and practices regarding intellectual property [...]

IP Justice Participates at WIPO Committee on Development Meeting

By Robin Gross|2021-12-08T19:19:57+00:00December 8th, 2021|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Uncategorized, WIPO|Tags: A2K, Access to Knowledge, Civil Society, Copyright, Development Agenda, Human Rights, IPR, Public Domain, WIPO|

From November 20th to 26th, 2021, IP Justice participated in the World Intellectual property Organization (WIPO) Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)’s Twenty-Seventh Session. The WIPO General Assembly established CDIP in 2008 to convene all WIPO member states, NGOs/IGOs, and observers such as IP Justice to discuss intellectual property [...]

IP Justice Statement at WIPO Committee on Development and Intellectual Property’s 27th Session

By Robin Gross|2021-12-08T19:04:18+00:00December 8th, 2021|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Publications, Uncategorized, WIPO|Tags: A2K, Access to Knowledge, AI, Civil Society, Copyright, Development Agenda, Fair Use, Public Domain, Trademarks, WIPO|

IP Justice Statement at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)’s Twenty-Seventh Session (20-26 November 2021) IP Justice urges the WIPO to provide more easily understandable resources for identifying available inventions in the public domain. For the public to have greater access to the [...]

IP Justice Supports Consumers’ Rights in the 2021 Comment to the USTR Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy

By Robin Gross|2022-02-01T18:31:59+00:00November 7th, 2021|Categories: Digital Rights, Innovation Policy, Uncategorized|Tags: A2K, Access to Knowledge, CDA Section 230, Copyright, Fair Use, Intermediary Liability, Trademarks, USTR|

Every year, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) publishes a Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy, known widely as the Notorious Markets List. The report highlights online and physical markets that reportedly engage in or facilitate substantial trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy. The USTR requests [...]