Your team is divided on crop demand forecasting. How will you navigate conflicting opinions in agribusiness? (original) (raw)

Last updated on Sep 19, 2024

Powered by AI and the LinkedIn community

Navigating conflicting opinions in agribusiness, especially concerning crop demand forecasting, can be as complex as farming itself. Your team's division might stem from different interpretations of market signals, varying levels of experience, or simply diverse analytical approaches. Understanding that each perspective is rooted in a desire to optimize farm operations is key. The challenge lies in harmonizing these differing views to arrive at a well-informed, strategic decision that benefits your agribusiness in the long term.

Top experts in this article

Selected by the community from 6 contributions. Learn more

• Quando minha equipe está dividida, o primeiro passo é voltar ao básico. Revisamos juntos os dados históricos e as tendências do mercado. Isso ajuda a manter o pé no chão e evita que qualquer previsão se baseie apenas no "feeling". Gosto de lembrar que, no agronegócio, quem se apoia nos números sempre sai na frente. A ideia é garantir que todos estejam na mesma página antes de tomar qualquer decisão.

• First, I would hold a meeting to ensure everyone’s views are clearly articulated. It’s important to understand where each opinion is coming from, whether based on differing data sources, methodologies, or experiences. Active listening will help identify the root cause of the disagreement.

• Em seguida, eu coloco a turma para cruzar os dados que temos em mãos. Comparo as previsões com o que está rolando no mercado atualmente e, se precisar, trago especialistas externos para dar uma olhada. Prefiro essa abordagem porque, com dados concretos, a discussão fica mais produtiva e menos emocional. Isso me ajuda a navegar pelas opiniões conflitantes com mais clareza e objetividade.

• Relying on data is crucial in resolving such conflicts. I would gather relevant historical data, market trends, weather patterns, and other variables impacting demand forecasts. Encouraging each team member to provide concrete data backing their perspectives can clarify the situation.

Decision Framework

Establishing a clear decision-making framework can help navigate through the maze of conflicting opinions. This framework should include defined criteria for evaluating forecasting methods and set thresholds for when to revise predictions. By having a structured approach, your team can weigh the pros and cons of each opinion within a consistent context. This process not only streamlines decision-making but also ensures that the chosen direction aligns with the overall business strategy and objectives.

• Para finalizar, junto a equipe e monto um quadro de decisão, onde colocamos todas as opiniões e cenários possíveis. Isso permite que a gente visualize as consequências de cada escolha e priorize as mais embasadas em fatos. Dessa forma, a decisão final é mais equilibrada e leva em conta as diferentes perspectivas, mas sempre com foco no que é mais provável de dar certo na prática.

Expert Consultation

Sometimes, the best way to bridge the gap between conflicting opinions is to consult external experts. These professionals can provide an unbiased perspective on crop demand forecasting, informed by their experience and industry knowledge. Their insights can validate certain viewpoints or introduce new considerations that your team may have overlooked. Bringing in experts can also help in depersonalizing the conflict, making it easier for your team to reach a consensus.

• If the team remains divided, consulting external experts or using third-party forecasts can bring a neutral viewpoint to the table. This is especially helpful when internal data or models are conflicting or inconclusive.

More relevant reading

``