Dr. Tenpenny cries “FOWL”: Bird flu panic is largely a result of media manipulation, corporate interests and environmental degradation – NaturalNews.com (original) (raw)
Dr. Tenpenny cries “FOWL”: Bird flu panic is largely a result of media manipulation, corporate interests and environmental degradation
- Dr. Sherri J. Tenpenny argues in her book "Fowl: Bird Flu – It's Not What You Think" that the fear surrounding bird flu is largely a result of media manipulation and corporate interests and environmental degradation, rather than an imminent viral threat.
- Tenpenny reveals how health agencies and vaccine manufacturers collaborate to orchestrate media campaigns that instill fear and drive vaccine demand, citing a 2004 example where over a thousand messages promoting flu shots were broadcast in a single week.
- The persistence of the bird flu narrative is explained through the psychology of belief, where misinformation once integrated into a person’s mental model becomes resistant to change, despite evidence questioning the efficacy and safety of flu vaccinations.
- Tenpenny draws parallels to past pandemics, suggesting that environmental factors such as malnutrition, chemical exposure, and societal stressors played significant roles in exacerbating these outbreaks, and argues that current environmental toxins are similarly weakening immune systems.
- Instead of relying on mass vaccination, Tenpenny advocates for addressing the root causes of disease, including environmental pollution and immune system degradation, and calls for collective action to clean up the environment and demand accountability from governments and corporations.
In a world increasingly dominated by fear of pandemics, the specter of bird flu has once again captured global attention. But what if the narrative surrounding this looming threat is not what it seems?
Dr. Sherri J. Tenpenny, in her provocative book "Fowl: Bird Flu – It's Not What You Think," challenges conventional wisdom, arguing that the bird flu scare is less about a viral apocalypse and more about media manipulation, corporate interests and environmental degradation. Her insights, drawn from historical pandemics and contemporary research, suggest that the real crisis lies not in the virus itself but in the toxic chemicals weakening both human and animal immune systems.
The bird flu narrative, as presented by mainstream media and public health agencies, often evokes images of a catastrophic global outbreak. Yet Tenpenny reveals a coordinated effort to shape public perception.
She cites a 2004 presentation by Dr. Glenn Nowak of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who detailed how the media was used to promote flu vaccinations. During a single week in 2004, over a thousand messages urging flu shots flooded the airwaves – one every 15 minutes. This campaign was not spontaneous but a calculated strategy funded by vaccine manufacturers in collaboration with health agencies.
The result? A multi-million-dollar publicity machine that instills fear and drives vaccine demand.
But why does this narrative persist despite evidence challenging its validity? Tenpenny points to the psychology of belief. According to psychologist Stephan Lewandowsky, once misinformation is integrated into a person’s mental model, it becomes resistant to change.
This phenomenon explains why many continue to support flu vaccinations despite studies questioning their efficacy. For instance, a 2005 New York Times report highlighted a study published in The Lancet that reviewed 64 previous flu seasons. The study found flu shots to be largely ineffective and potentially even very harmful, especially for the elderly. Yet public health officials doubled down on vaccination campaigns, illustrating the power of entrenched beliefs.
Tenpenny draws parallels between the bird flu scare and past pandemics, suggesting a recurring pattern of fear-mongering. She references the 1918 Spanish flu, which claimed millions of lives not solely due to the virus but because of widespread malnutrition, chemical exposure and the stresses of World War I. Similarly, the 1957 Asian flu and the 1968 Hong Kong flu were exacerbated by environmental and societal factors. These historical examples, she argues, underscore the role of environmental toxins in weakening immune systems and increasing susceptibility to disease.
Today, the connection between environmental contamination and pandemics is more relevant than ever. Tenpenny highlights the presence of dioxins and other persistent organic pollutants, which accumulate in the fat of animals and humans, suppressing immune function. Studies show that these toxins, combined with influenza viruses, can lead to severe illness and death.
She also raises concerns about the safety of bird flu vaccines, which are being developed using untested technologies like cell-culture methods and adjuvants. These innovations, she warns, could have long-term side effects, including autoimmune disorders and cancer. Instead of focusing on mass vaccination, Tenpenny advocates for addressing the root causes of disease: Environmental pollution and immune system degradation.
So, what can be done? Tenpenny calls for collective action. She urges individuals to educate themselves, support environmental cleanup initiatives and demand accountability from governments and corporations. She argues that cleaning up the environment where humans and birds live would be far more effective than forcing untested chemicals into people's bloodstreams.
The bird flu scare, as Tenpenny reveals, is not merely a public health issue but a reflection of deeper systemic problems. By shifting the focus from fear to environmental stewardship, society can address the true drivers of disease and build a healthier, more sustainable future.
Watch this video that goes into detail regarding Dr. Sherri J. Tenpenny's book "Fowl: Bird Flu – It's Not What You Think."
This video is from the BrightLearn channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include: