Authorship position should not serve as a proxy metric (original) (raw)
- CORRESPONDENCE
- 21 February 2018
By
- Daniel Hornburg
- Stanford University, California, USA.
Marcus Munafò and George Davey Smith suggest that using different lines of evidence (triangulation) to verify results will change how credit is assigned to authors of research papers (Nature 553, 399–401; 2018). In my view, it would help if we were to abolish the convention of using an author’s position in the list as a proxy weighting of contribution. Such a move would shift the assessor’s curiosity to the ‘author contributions’ section, and render evaluation more meaningful and transparent.
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 52 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.83 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Nature 554, 423 (2018)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-02204-w
Related Articles
Subjects
Latest on:
Tool flags suspicious journals before researchers submit papers News 11 JUN 26
Seven steps for critically analysing research papers Career Column 09 JUN 26
My diverse academic background is affecting my PhD studies — what do I do? Career Feature 11 JUN 26
Five winning images of scientists at work Career Feature 10 JUN 26
Let’s talk about biomedical research kits Career Column 09 JUN 26
‘Student Geng’ ignites research-integrity scandal in China after calling out senior academics Career News 12 JUN 26