25 years of chemistry that simply clicks (original) (raw)

When the concept of ‘click’ chemistry — highly effective and specific reactions — was first reported, some dismissed it as a gimmick. But it has transformed many fields of research.

By

  1. Willow A. Davis
    1. Willow A. Davis is in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
  2. Ellen M. Sletten
    1. Ellen M. Sletten is in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.

In 2001, the chemists H. C. Kolb, M. G. Finn and K. Barry Sharpless published a review1 in Angewandte Chemie that revolutionized how molecules were used in several scientific fields. The paper launched the concept of click chemistry: a class of chemical reactions that work in solution exceptionally efficiently to ‘click’ together two or more molecules in a highly specific manner and without producing any unwanted by-products. Originally conceived of as a tool for synthesizing pharmaceutical candidates, click chemistry is now widely used by biologists and engineers, and won Sharpless a share of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

References

  1. Kolb, H. C., Finn, M. G. & Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 40, 2004–2021 (2001).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Moorhouse, A. D., Homer, J. A. & Moses, J. E. Chem 9, 2063–2077 (2023).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Rostovtsev, V. V., Green, L. G., Fokin, V. V. & Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 41, 2596–2599 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Tornøe, C. W., Christensen, C. & Meldal, M. J. Org. Chem. 67, 3057–3064 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Carell, T. et al. Chem. Biol. 2, 171–183 (1995).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Kolb, H. C. & Sharpless, K. B. Drug Discov. Today 8, 1128–1137 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Lewis, W. G. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 41, 1053–1057 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Saxon, E. & Bertozzi, C. R. Science 287, 2007–2010 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Bednarek, C., Wehl, I., Jung, N., Schepers, U. & Bräse, S. Chem. Rev. 120, 4301–4354 (2020).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Chang, P. V. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1821–1826 (2010).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Srinivasan, S. et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 31, 3662–3677 (2025).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Parker, C. G. & Pratt, M. R. Cell 180, 605–632 (2020).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Wu, P. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 43, 3928–3932 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Taiariol, L., Chaix, C., Farre, C. & Moreau, E. Chem. Rev. 122, 340–384 (2022).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Collman, J. P., Devaraj, N. K. & Chidsey, C. E. D. Langmuir 20, 1051–1053 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Lummerstorfer, T. & Hoffmann, H. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 3963–3966 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Olanow, C. W., Standaert, D. G., Kieburtz, K., Viegas, T. X. & Moreadith, R. Mov. Disord. 35, 1055–1061 (2020).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Hu, J. et al. Small 20, 2306622 (2024).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Dong, J., Krasnova, L., Finn, M. G. & Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 53, 9430–9448 (2014).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Sun, S. et al. Chem 9, 2128–2143 (2023).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.