The dental proteome of Homo antecessor (original) (raw)

Data availability

Mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD014342. Generated ancient protein consensus sequences used for phylogenetic analysis for H. antecessor (Atapuerca) and H. erectus (Dmanisi) hominins can be found in the Supplementary Data 2, which is formatted as a .fasta file. Full protein sequence alignments used during phylogenetic analysis can be accessed via Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9927074). Amino acid racemization data are available online through the NOAA database. The wiNNer model can be accessed on GitHub (https://github.com/cox-labs/wiNNer.git).

Change history

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2580-6

References

  1. Gabunia, L. et al. Earliest Pleistocene hominid cranial remains from Dmanisi, Republic of Georgia: taxonomy, geological setting, and age. Science 288, 1019–1025 (2000).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Zhu, Z. et al. Hominin occupation of the Chinese Loess Plateau since about 2.1 million years ago. Nature 559, 608–612 (2018).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Stringer, C. The origin and evolution of Homo sapiens. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 371, 20150237 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Hublin, J. J. The origin of Neandertals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16022–16027 (2009).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  5. Rightmire, G. Human evolution in the Middle Pleistocene: the role of Homo heidelbergensis. Evol. Anthropol. 6, 218–227 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Cappellini, E. et al. Early Pleistocene enamel proteome from Dmanisi resolves Stephanorhinus phylogeny. Nature 574, 103–107 (2019).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  7. Chen, F. et al. A late Middle Pleistocene Denisovan mandible from the Tibetan Plateau. Nature 569, 409–412 (2019).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Welker, F. et al. Enamel proteome shows that Gigantopithecus was an early diverging pongine. Nature 576, 262–265 (2019).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  9. Bermúdez de Castro, J. M. et al. A hominid from the lower Pleistocene of Atapuerca, Spain: possible ancestor to Neandertals and modern humans. Science 276, 1392–1395 (1997).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Carbonell, E. et al. Lower Pleistocene hominids and artifacts from Atapuerca-TD6 (Spain). Science 269, 826–830 (1995).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Duval, M. et al. The first direct ESR dating of a hominin tooth from Atapuerca Gran Dolina TD-6 (Spain) supports the antiquity of Homo antecessor. Quat. Geochronol. 47, 120–137 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Freidline, S. E., Gunz, P., Harvati, K. & Hublin, J.-J. Evaluating developmental shape changes in Homo antecessor subadult facial morphology. J. Hum. Evol. 65, 404–423 (2013).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Lacruz, R. S. et al. Facial morphogenesis of the earliest Europeans. PLoS One 8, e65199 (2013).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  14. Ferring, R. et al. Earliest human occupations at Dmanisi (Georgian Caucasus) dated to 1.85–1.78 Ma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10432–10436 (2011).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  15. Lordkipanidze, D. et al. A complete skull from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the evolutionary biology of early Homo. Science 342, 326–331 (2013).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Stewart, N. A., Gerlach, R. F., Gowland, R. L., Gron, K. J. & Montgomery, J. Sex determination of human remains from peptides in tooth enamel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 13649–13654 (2017).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  17. Tiwary, S. et al. High-quality MS/MS spectrum prediction for data-dependent and data-independent acquisition data analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 519–525 (2019).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Castiblanco, G. A. et al. Identification of proteins from human permanent erupted enamel. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 123, 390–395 (2015).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Asaka, T. et al. Type XVII collagen is a key player in tooth enamel formation. Am. J. Pathol. 174, 91–100 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  20. Porto, I. M., Laure, H. J., de Sousa, F. B., Rosa, J. C. & Gerlach, R. F. New techniques for the recovery of small amounts of mature enamel proteins. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38, 3596–3604 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Gasse, B., Chiari, Y., Silvent, J., Davit-Béal, T. & Sire, J.-Y. Amelotin: an enamel matrix protein that experienced distinct evolutionary histories in amphibians, sauropsids and mammals. BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 47 (2015).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  22. Demarchi, B. et al. Protein sequences bound to mineral surfaces persist into deep time. eLife 5, e17092 (2016).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  23. Tagliabracci, V. S. et al. Secreted kinase phosphorylates extracellular proteins that regulate biomineralization. Science 336, 1150–1153 (2012).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  24. Hu, J. C. C., Yamakoshi, Y., Yamakoshi, F., Krebsbach, P. H. & Simmer, J. P. Proteomics and genetics of dental enamel. Cells Tissues Organs 181, 219–231 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Glimcher, M. J., Cohen-Solal, L., Kossiva, D. & de Ricqles, A. Biochemical analyses of fossil enamel and dentin. Paleobiology 16, 219–232 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Wagner, G. A. et al. Radiometric dating of the type-site for Homo heidelbergensis at Mauer, Germany. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19726–19730 (2010).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  27. Martinón-Torres, M. et al. Dental evidence on the hominin dispersals during the Pleistocene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13279–13282 (2007).
    Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  28. Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., Martinón-Torres, M., Arsuaga, J. L. & Carbonell, E. Twentieth anniversary of Homo antecessor (1997–2017): a review. Evol. Anthropol. 26, 157–171 (2017).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Gómez-Robles, A., Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., Arsuaga, J.-L., Carbonell, E. & Polly, P. D. No known hominin species matches the expected dental morphology of the last common ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18196–18201 (2013).
    Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  30. Meyer, M. et al. Nuclear DNA sequences from the Middle Pleistocene Sima de los Huesos hominins. Nature 531, 504–507 (2016).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Prüfer, K. et al. The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains. Nature 505, 43–49 (2014).
    Article ADS PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Lacruz, R. S. et al. The evolutionary history of the human face. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 726–736 (2019).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Mallick, S. et al. The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 genomes from 142 diverse populations. Nature 538, 201–206 (2016).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  34. The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Welker, F. et al. Middle Pleistocene protein sequences from the rhinoceros genus Stephanorhinus and the phylogeny of extant and extinct Middle/Late Pleistocene Rhinocerotidae. PeerJ 5, e3033 (2017).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  36. Hill, R. C. et al. Preserved proteins from extinct Bison latifrons identified by tandem mass spectrometry; hydroxylysine glycosides are a common feature of ancient collagen. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 1946–1958 (2015).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  37. Wadsworth, C. & Buckley, M. Proteome degradation in fossils: investigating the longevity of protein survival in ancient bone. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 28, 605–615 (2014).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  38. Orlando, L. et al. Recalibrating Equus evolution using the genome sequence of an early Middle Pleistocene horse. Nature 499, 74–78 (2013).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Penkman, K. E. H., Kaufman, D. S., Maddy, D. & Collins, M. J. Closed-system behaviour of the intra-crystalline fraction of amino acids in mollusc shells. Quat. Geochronol. 3, 2–25 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  40. Dickinson, M., Lister, A. M. & Penkman, K. E. H. A new method for enamel amino acid racemization dating: a closed system approach. Quat. Geochronol. 50, 29–46 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Hill, R. L. Hydrolysis of proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 20, 37–107 (1965).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Mackie, M. et al. Palaeoproteomic profiling of conservation layers on a 14th century italian wall painting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 57, 7369–7374 (2018).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  43. Castellano, S. et al. Patterns of coding variation in the complete exomes of three Neandertals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6666–6671 (2014).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  44. de Manuel, M. et al. Chimpanzee genomic diversity reveals ancient admixture with bonobos. Science 354, 477–481 (2016).
    Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  45. Nater, A. et al. Morphometric, behavioral, and genomic evidence for a new orangutan species. Curr. Biol. 27, 3487–3498.e10 (2017).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Prado-Martinez, J. et al. Great ape genetic diversity and population history. Nature 499, 471–475 (2013).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  47. Hanson-Smith, V. & Johnson, A. PhyloBot: a web portal for automated phylogenetics, ancestral sequence reconstruction, and exploration of mutational trajectories. PLOS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004976 (2016).
    Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  48. Welker, F. Elucidation of cross-species proteomic effects in human and hominin bone proteome identification through a bioinformatics experiment. BMC Evol. Biol. 18, 23 (2018).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  49. Hendy, J. et al. A guide to ancient protein studies. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 791–799 (2018).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Zhang, J. et al. PEAKS DB: de novo sequencing assisted database search for sensitive and accurate peptide identification. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, M111.010587 (2012).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Chun, Y. H. P. et al. Cleavage site specificity of MMP-20 for secretory-stage ameloblastin. J. Dent. Res. 89, 785–790 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  53. Yamakoshi, Y., Hu, J. C. C., Fukae, M., Yamakoshi, F. & Simmer, J. P. How do enamelysin and kallikrein 4 process the 32-kDa enamelin? Eur. J. Oral Sci. 114 (Suppl 1), 45–51, 93–95, 379–380 (2006).
    Google Scholar
  54. Iwata, T. et al. Processing of ameloblastin by MMP-20. J. Dent. Res. 86, 153–157 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Nagano, T. et al. Mmp-20 and Klk4 cleavage site preferences for amelogenin sequences. J. Dent. Res. 88, 823–828 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  56. Fukae, M. et al. Primary structure of the porcine 89-kDa enamelin. Adv. Dent. Res. 10, 111–118 (1996).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Colaert, N., Helsens, K., Martens, L., Vandekerckhove, J. & Gevaert, K. Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo. Nat. Methods 6, 786–787 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Prüfer, K. et al. A high-coverage Neandertal genome from Vindija Cave in Croatia. Science 358, 655–658 (2017).
    Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  59. Meyer, M. et al. A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual. Science 338, 222–226 (2012).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  60. Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066 (2002).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  61. Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  63. Bouckaert, R. et al. BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLOS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006650 (2019).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  64. Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. in Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) 1–8 (New Orleans, 2010).
  65. Besenbacher, S., Hvilsom, C., Marques-Bonet, T., Mailund, T. & Schierup, M. H. Direct estimation of mutations in great apes reconciles phylogenetic dating. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 286–292 (2019).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901–904 (2018).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

F.W. is supported by a Marie Skłodowska Curie Individual Fellowship (no. 795569). E. Cappellini was supported by VILLUM FONDEN (no. 17649). E.W. is supported by the Lundbeck Foundation, the Danish National Research Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Carlsberg Foundation, KU2016 and the Wellcome Trust. Without the effort of the members of the Atapuerca research team during fieldwork, this work would have not been possible; we make a special mention of J. Rosell, who supervises the excavation of the TD6 level. The research of the Atapuerca project has been supported by the Dirección General de Investigación of the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (grant numbers PGC2018-093925-B-C31, C32, and C33); field seasons are supported by the Consejería de Cultura y Turismo of the Junta de Castilla y León and the Fundación Atapuerca. We acknowledge The Leakey Foundation through the personal support of G. Getty (2013) and D. Crook (2014–2016, 2018, and 2019) to M.M.-T., as well as F.W. (2017). Restoration and conservation work on the material have been carried out by P. Fernández-Colón and E. Lacasa from the Conservation and Restoration Area of CENIEH-ICTS and L. López-Polín from IPHES. The picture of the specimen ATD6-92 was made by M. Modesto-Mata. E. Cappellini, J.C., J.V.O. and P. Gutenbrunner are supported by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie European Training Network (ETN) TEMPERA, a project funded by the European Union’s Framework Program for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (grant agreement no. 722606). Amino acid analyses were undertaken thanks to the Leverhulme Trust (PLP-2012-116) and NERC (NE/K500987/1). T.M.-B. is supported by BFU2017-86471-P (MINECO/FEDER, UE), U01 MH106874 grant, Howard Hughes International Early Career, Obra Social ‘La Caixa’ and Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca and CERCA Programme del Departament d’Economia i Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya (GRC 2017 SGR 880). C.L.-F. is supported by a FEDER-MINECO grant (PGC2018-095931-B-100). M.K. was supported by the Postdoctoral Junior Leader Fellowship Programme from ‘la Caixa’ Banking Foundation (LCF/BQ/PR19/11700002). M.M. is supported by the Danish National Research Foundation award PROTEIOS (DNRF128). Work at the Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research is funded in part by a donation from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number NNF14CC0001). The CRG/UPF Proteomics Unit is part of the Spanish Infrastructure for Omics Technologies (ICTS OmicsTech) and it is a member of the ProteoRed PRB3 consortium, which is supported by grant PT17/0019 of the PE I+D+i 2013-2016 from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and ERDF. We acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, ‘Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2013-2017’, SEV-2012-0208, and ‘Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca del Departament d’Economia i Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya’ (2017SGR595). D.L. and A.M. are supported by the John Templeton Foundation (no. 52935) and by the Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation of Georgia (no. FR-18-27262). We thank M. L. Schjellerup Jørkov for providing specimen Ø1952.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Frido Welker, Jazmín Ramos-Madrigal, Petra Gutenbrunner

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Evolutionary Genomics Section, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Frido Welker, Jazmín Ramos-Madrigal, Meaghan Mackie & Enrico Cappellini
  2. Computational Systems Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Petra Gutenbrunner, Shivani Tiwary & Jürgen Cox
  3. The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Meaghan Mackie, Rosa Rakownikow Jersie-Christensen & Jesper V. Olsen
  4. Center for Genomic Regulation (CNAG-CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Cristina Chiva, Tomas Marques-Bonet & Eduard Sabidó
  5. Proteomics Unit, University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
    Cristina Chiva & Eduard Sabidó
  6. Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, UK
    Marc R. Dickinson & Kirsty Penkman
  7. Institute of Evolutionary Biology (UPF-CSIC), University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
    Martin Kuhlwilm, Marc de Manuel, Pere Gelabert, Tomas Marques-Bonet & Carles Lalueza-Fox
  8. Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH), Burgos, Spain
    María Martinón-Torres & José María Bermúdez de Castro
  9. Anthropology Department, University College London, London, UK
    María Martinón-Torres & José María Bermúdez de Castro
  10. Georgian National Museum, Tbilisi, Georgia
    Ann Margvelashvili & David Lordkipanidze
  11. Centro Mixto UCM-ISCIII de Evolución y Comportamiento Humanos, Madrid, Spain
    Juan Luis Arsuaga
  12. Departamento de Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
    Juan Luis Arsuaga
  13. Departamento d’Història i Història de l’Art, Universidad Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
    Eudald Carbonell
  14. Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES), Tarragona, Spain
    Eudald Carbonell
  15. Catalan Institution of Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
    Tomas Marques-Bonet
  16. Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Tomas Marques-Bonet
  17. Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
    David Lordkipanidze
  18. Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Fernando Racimo & Eske Willerslev
  19. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
    Eske Willerslev
  20. Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
    Eske Willerslev
  21. Danish Institute for Advanced Study, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
    Eske Willerslev

Authors

  1. Frido Welker
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Jazmín Ramos-Madrigal
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Petra Gutenbrunner
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Meaghan Mackie
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Shivani Tiwary
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Rosa Rakownikow Jersie-Christensen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Cristina Chiva
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Marc R. Dickinson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Martin Kuhlwilm
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Marc de Manuel
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Pere Gelabert
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. María Martinón-Torres
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. Ann Margvelashvili
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. Juan Luis Arsuaga
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  15. Eudald Carbonell
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  16. Tomas Marques-Bonet
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  17. Kirsty Penkman
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  18. Eduard Sabidó
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  19. Jürgen Cox
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  20. Jesper V. Olsen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  21. David Lordkipanidze
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  22. Fernando Racimo
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  23. Carles Lalueza-Fox
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  24. José María Bermúdez de Castro
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  25. Eske Willerslev
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  26. Enrico Cappellini
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E. Cappellini, E.W., J.M.B.d.C., D.L., C.L.-F. and F.W. designed the study. E. Cappellini, M.M., F.W., J.R.-M., R.R.J.-C., M.R.D., C.C. and M.d.M. performed experiments. E. Cappellini, A.M., J.L.A., E. Carbonell, P. Gelabert, E.S., J.C., J.V.O., T.M.-B. and D.L. provided material, reagents or research infrastructure. F.W., J.R.-M., P. Gutenbrunner, S.T., E. Cappellini, F.R., M.M.-T., J.M.B.d.C., M.K., M.R.D., C.L.-F. and K.P. analysed data. F.W., E. Cappellini and J.M.B.d.C. wrote the manuscript with input from all other authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toFrido Welker, José María Bermúdez de Castro, Eske Willerslev or Enrico Cappellini.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Location and stratigraphy of the hominin fossils studied.

a, Geographic location of Gran Dolina and Dmanisi. Base map was generated using public domain data from www.naturalearthdata.com. b, Summarized stratigraphic profile of Gran Dolina, including the location of hominin fossils in layers ‘Pep’ and ‘Jordi’ of sublevel TD6.2.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Hominin specimens studied.

a, ATD6-92 in buccal view. The fragment represents a portion of a permanent lower left first or second molar. b, D4163 in occlusal view. The specimen is a fragmented right upper first molar. Scale bar differs between a and b.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Amino acid racemization of D4163.

a, b, The extent of intracrystalline racemization in enamel for the free amino acid (FAA) (x axis) fraction and the total hydrolysable amino acids (THAA) (y axis) fraction for aspartic acid plus asparagine (here denoted Asx) (a), and glutamic acid plus glutamine (here denoted Glx) (b), demonstrates endogenous amino acids breaking down within a closed system. The hominin value is displayed in relation to values for enamel samples from other fauna from Dmanisi6 (blue squares) and a range of previously obtained Pleistocene and Pliocene Proboscidea from the UK40 (grey diamonds). Fauna are shown for comparison, but different rates in their protein breakdown mean that they will show different extents of racemization. The x and y axis are on different scales.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Sequence coverage for five enamel-specific proteins across Pleistocene samples and recent human controls.

For each protein, the bars span protein positions covered, with positions remapped to the human reference proteome. The top row indicates the position of a selection of known MMP20 and KLK4 cleavage products of the enamel-specific proteins AMELX55, AMBN52 and ENAM56. Several in vivo proteolytic degradation fragments of ENAM share the same N terminus, but have unknown C termini53. Dotted line for AMBN indicates a putative cleavage product based on known MMP20 (squares) and KLK4 (circles) in vivo cleavage positions. For AMTN, serines (S) at positions 115 and 116 (indicated by asterisks) are conserved among vertebrates and involved in mineral-binding21. Additional cleavage products as well as MMP20 and KLK4 cleavage sites are known in all enamel-specific proteins. SK33916 and Ø1952 are two recent human control samples (Methods). AA, amino acids; Steph., Stephanorhinus6; TRAP, tyrosine-rich amelogenin polypeptide.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Homo antecessor specimen ATD6-92 represents a male hominin.

a, Mass spectrum of an AMELY-specific peptide from the recent human control Ø1952. b, Mass spectrum of the same AMELY-specific peptide from H. antecessor. c, Alignment of a selection of AMELY- and AMELX-specific peptide fragment ion series deriving from H. antecessor. The alignment stretches along human AMELX isoform 1, positions 37 to 52 only (Uniprot accession numbers Q99217 (AMELX), Q99218 (AMELY)). See Supplementary Fig. 5 for another example of an AMELY-specific MS2 spectrum.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Enamel proteome damage.

a, b, Glutamine (Q) and asparagine (N) deamidation of enamel-specific proteins from H. antecessor (Atapuerca) (a), and H. erectus (Dmanisi) (b). Values are based on 1,000 bootstrap replications of protein deamidation. c, Relationship between mean asparagine (N) and glutamine (Q) deamidation for all proteins in both the Atapuerca and Dmanisi hominin datasets. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval window of 1,000 bootstrap replications of protein deamidation. Dashed line is x = y. d, Peptide length distribution of H. antecessor (Atapuerca), H. erectus (Dmanisi), four previously published enamel proteomes6,8,16 and one additional human Medieval control sample (Ø1952). For a, b and d, the number of peptides (n) is given for each violin plot. The box plots within the violin plots define the range of the data (whiskers extend to 1.5× the interquartile range), outliers (black dots, beyond 1.5× the interquartile range), 25th and 75th percentiles (boxes), and medians (centre lines). P values of two-sided _t_-tests conducted between sample pairs are indicated. No independent replication of these experiments was performed.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Survival of in vivo MMP20 and KLK4 cleavage sites in the Atapuerca enamel proteome.

a, Experimentally observed cleavage matrices for ameloblastin (AMBN), enamelin (ENAM) and amelogenin (AMELX and AMELY) (Methods). Fold differences are colour-coded by comparing observed PSM cleavage frequencies to a random cleavage matrix for each protein separately7. b, Fold differences for all observed cleavage pairs per protein. Red filled circles represent MMP20, KLK4 and signal peptide cleavage sites mentioned in the literature53,54,55,56. Red open circles indicate cleavage sites located up to two amino acid positions away from such sites. c, PSM coverage for each protein. The signal peptide (thick horizontal bar labelled ‘sig’), known MMP20 and KLK4 cleavage sites (vertical bars), and O- and N-linked glycosylation sites (asterisks) are also indicated. For AMELX, peptide positions for all three known isoforms were remapped to the coordinates of isoform 3, which represents the longest isoform (UniProt accession Q99217-3). The x and y axes differ between the three panels of c.

Extended Data Table 1 Extraction and mass spectrometry details of analyses conducted on both ancient hominin specimens

Full size table

Extended Data Table 2 Ancient hominin enamel proteome composition and coverage

Full size table

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information containing supplementary information on the archaeological sites of Gran Dolina, Atapuerca, and Dmanisi, amino acid racemization, proteomic data extraction, data generation, and data analysis, as well as phylogenetic analysis of recovered ancient hominin proteomes. The Supplementary Information contains 11 SI tables and 16 SI figures.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data

Supplementary information file containing annotated MS/MS spectra of phylogenetic interest.

Supplementary Data

File in .fasta format containing recovered Homo antecessor (Atapuerca) and Homo erectus (Dmanisi) protein sequences. Sequence coverage obtained after MaxQuant and PEAKS analysis is combined.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welker, F., Ramos-Madrigal, J., Gutenbrunner, P. et al. The dental proteome of Homo antecessor.Nature 580, 235–238 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2153-8

Download citation