The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation (original) (raw)

Abstract

Some individuals (helpers) in cooperatively breeding species provide alloparental care and often suppress their own reproduction. Kin selection is clearly an important explanation for such behaviour, but a possible alternative is group augmentation where individuals survive or reproduce better in large groups and where it therefore pays to recruit new members to the group. The evolutionary stability of group augmentation is currently disputed. We model evolutionarily stable helping strategies by following the dynamics of social groups with varying degrees of subordinate help. We also distinguish between passive augmentation, where a group member benefits from the mere presence of others, and active augmentation, where their presence as such is neutral or harmful, but where helping to recruit new group members may still be beneficial if they in turn actively provide help for the current reproductives ('delayed reciprocity'). The results show that group augmentation (either passive or active) can be evolutionarily stable and explain costly helping by non-reproductive subordinates, either alone or leading to elevated help levels when acting in concert with kin selection. Group augmentation can thus potentially explain the weak relationships between relatedness and helping behaviour that are observed in some cooperatively breeding species. In some cases, the superior mutualistic performance of cooperatively behaving groups can generate an incentive to stay and help which is strong enough to make ecological constraints unnecessary for explaining the stability of cooperatively breeding groups.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (288.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown J. L., Pimm S. L. The origin of helping: the role of variability in reproductive potential. J Theor Biol. 1985 Feb 7;112(3):465–477. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(85)80015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clutton-Brock T. H., Brotherton P. N., O'Riain M. J., Griffin A. S., Gaynor D., Sharpe L., Kansky R., Manser M. B., McIlrath G. M. Individual contributions to babysitting in a cooperative mongoose, Suricata suricatta. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Feb 7;267(1440):301–305. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clutton-Brock T. H., Gaynor D., Kansky R., MacColl A. D., McIlrath G., Chadwick P., Brotherton P. N., O'Riain J. M., Manser M., Skinner J. D. Costs of cooperative behaviour in suricates (Suricata suricatta). Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 7;265(1392):185–190. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Emlen S. T. An evolutionary theory of the family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8092–8099. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamilton W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hatchwell BJ, Komdeur J. Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1079–1086. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heinsohn R, Legge S. The cost of helping. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Feb;14(2):53–57. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01545-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koenig W. D., Pitelka F. A., Carmen W. J., Mumme R. L., Stanback M. T. The evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperative breeders. Q Rev Biol. 1992 Jun;67(2):111–150. doi: 10.1086/417552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lancaster J. B. Play-mothering: the relations between juvenile females and young infants among free-ranging vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Folia Primatol (Basel) 1971;15(3):163–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  11. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  12. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  13. Roberts G., Sherratt T. N. Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature. 1998 Jul 9;394(6689):175–179. doi: 10.1038/28160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]