Genomic and Functional Analyses of SXT, an Integrating Antibiotic Resistance Gene Transfer Element Derived from Vibrio cholerae (original) (raw)

Abstract

SXT is representative of a family of conjugative-transposon-like mobile genetic elements that encode multiple antibiotic resistance genes. In recent years, SXT-related conjugative, self-transmissible integrating elements have become widespread in Asian Vibrio cholerae. We have determined the 100-kb DNA sequence of SXT. This element appears to be a chimera composed of transposon-associated antibiotic resistance genes linked to a variety of plasmid- and phage-related genes, as well as to many genes from unknown sources. We constructed a nearly comprehensive set of deletions through the use of the one-step chromosomal gene inactivation technique to identify SXT genes involved in conjugative transfer and chromosomal excision. SXT, unlike other conjugative transposons, utilizes a conjugation system related to that encoded by the F plasmid. More than half of the SXT genome, including the composite transposon-like structure that contains its antibiotic resistance genes, was not required for its mobility. Two SXT loci, designated setC and setD, whose predicted amino acid sequences were similar to those of the flagellar regulators FlhC and FlhD, were found to encode regulators that activate the transcription of genes required for SXT excision and transfer. Another locus, designated setR, whose gene product bears similarity to lambdoid phage CI repressors, also appears to regulate SXT gene expression.


The term conjugative transposon (CTn) encompasses a diverse and growing group of mobile genetic elements. Though transmissible via conjugation, CTns, unlike conjugative plasmids, are not thought to have an autonomously replicating extrachromosomal form; instead, CTns integrate into their hosts' chromosomes. Chromosomal integration by CTns is mediated by recombinases of either the integrase (27, 28) or resolvase (33) family. CTn integration can be more or less site specific, depending on the particular CTn as well as the host background. In some cases, the molecular details of CTn integration have been characterized in some detail (28). CTn transfer is thought to occur via a nonreplicative circular intermediate that forms following the excision of the element from the chromosome. The gene products that mediate conjugative transfer of these elements have not been extensively studied; however, DNA sequence and genetic analyses of the two most studied CTns, the Tn_916_-related CTns derived from gram-positive bacteria and the _Bacteroides_-derived CTnDOT-related CTns, suggest that CTn-encoded conjugative transfer systems are not related to those encoded by known conjugative plasmids (3, 8).

In addition to containing DNA sequences coding for their self-transmissibility, CTns impart a variety of properties to their hosts. CTns provide an important means for dissemination of genes encoding resistance to antibiotics (27) and heavy metals (6) among gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Additionally, CTns have been found to encode pathways for the degradation of aromatic compounds (22), sucrose metabolism (12), nitrogen fixation and vitamin biosynthesis (31), and nisin synthesis (25).

In Vibrio cholerae, the gram-negative bacterium that causes the severe diarrheal disease cholera, resistance determinants to sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, and streptomycin are carried on a CTn-like element called SXT (32). This element was initially detected in the newly emerged O139 serogroup of V. cholerae, but SXT or very closely related elements are now found in virtually all clinical V. cholerae isolates from the Indian subcontinent (13). We also recently detected SXT (or at least a very similar element) in Providencia alcalifaciens isolates from patients with diarrhea in Bangladesh (13). SXT appears to be representative of a family of closely related conjugative, self-transmissible, chromosomally integrating elements. One of these, R391, which was initially described in 1972 in a South African Providencia rettgeri isolate and carries kanamycin and mercury resistance determinants (6), integrates into the same chromosomal site as SXT, the 5′ end of prfC (11).

In the laboratory, SXT is transmissible by conjugation to a variety of gram-negative organisms, and it can mediate the transfer of certain mobilizable plasmids, as well as chromosomal DNA, in an Hfr-like fashion (14). A circular but nonreplicative extrachromosomal form of SXT is thought to be an intermediate in its transfer (15). The formation of this extrachromosomal form of SXT requires the SXT-encoded site-specific recombinase Int, which is closely related to the integrases found in the λ family of bacteriophages. This integrase is required for SXT transfer but not for SXT-dependent transfer of mobilizable plasmids or chromosomal DNA (14). Similar to lambdoid phages, SXT integrates site specifically into the chromosome in an _int_-dependent, _recA_-independent fashion (15).

In this study, we have determined and annotated the DNA sequence of SXT. A nearly comprehensive set of SXT gene deletions was constructed to characterize SXT sequences and genes involved in conjugative transfer and chromosomal excision. These studies revealed that the SXT conjugative apparatus is related to that encoded by the F plasmid and that over half of the SXT genome is not required for its transmissibility. Two SXT loci, designated setC and setD, were found to encode regulators that activate transcription of genes required for SXT excision and transfer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and media.

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. Nearly all of the Escherichia coli strains harboring deletions in SXT were constructed using the one-step chromosomal gene inactivation technique (7) and are derivatives of BW25113. An exception was JO216, which was constructed using an allele exchange vector, pDTraI, a derivative of the _sacB_-containing vector pWM91 (20). The presence of the appropriate chromosomal deletion in all cases was confirmed using PCR. The cat marker was left in BI957 to allow selection of the transfer of this element in conjugation assays. Bacterial strains were routinely grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (2) at 37°C on a roller drum incubator. Bacterial strains were maintained at −70°C in LB broth containing 20% (vol/vol) glycerol. Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: ampicillin, 100 mg liter−1; kanamycin, 50 mg liter−1; sulfamethoxazole, 160 mg liter−1; trimethoprim, 32 mg liter−1; tetracycline, 10 mg liter−1.

TABLE 1.

Strains and plasmids used in this study

Strain or plasmid Genotype or phenotype Reference or source
E. coli K-12
CAG18439 MG1655 lacZU118 lac142::Tn_10_ 30
HW220 SXT+ exconjugant of CAG18439 15
JO216 HW220 Δ_traI_ This study
BI533 MG1655 Nalr 14
TOP10 F−mcrA Δ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC) φ80_lacZ_ΔM15 Δ_lacX74 recA1 deoR araD139_ Δ(ara-leu)7697 galU galK rpsL (Strr) endA I nupG Invitrogen
BW25113 lacI_q_rrnB_t14 Δ_lacZ_WJ16_hsdR514 Δ_araBAD_AH33 Δ_rhaBAAD_LD78 7
JO193 SXTr exconjugant of BW25113 This study
BI957 JO193 Δ_rumB′-rumA_::cat This study
JO296 JO193 Δ_s024-s040_ This study
JO248 JO193 Δ_traD-s043_ This study
JO246 JO193 Δ_traD_ This study
JO247 JO193 Δ_s043_ This study
JO356 JO193 Δ_s044-s045_ This study
JO352 JO193 Δ_traL-traA_ This study
JO207 JO193 Δ_traA_ This study
JO355 JO193 Δ_s052-traN_ This study
JO249 JO193 Δ_s060-s073_ This study
BI918 JO193 Δ_s074_ This study
JO316 JO193 Δ_traG_ This study
JO251 JO193 Δ_s079-s084_ This study
JO313 JO193 Δ_setDC_ This study
JO212 JO193 Δ_floR_ This study
JO359 JO212 Δ(traL-traA)::lacZ This study
JO360 JO212 Δ_s003_::lacZ This study
JO386 JO212 Δ_traG_::lacZ This study
JO427 JO212 Δ_traN_::lacZ This study
JO400 JO212 Δ_setCD_::lacZ This study
JO397 JO212 Δ_floR_::lacZ This study
Plasmids
pSU4628 CloDF13::Tn_A_ Δ_Eco_RV 5
pCR2.1 Apr Knr Invitrogen
pOriT pCR2.1 containing putative SXT origin of transfer This study
pKD46 Ts plasmid expressing lambda Red recombinase from arabinose-inducible promoter 7
pKD3 Cmr PCR template for one-step chromosomal gene inactivation 7
pJB20 lacZ Cmr PCR template for one-step chromosomal gene inactivation This study
pKD4 Knr PCR template for one-step chromosomal gene inactivation 7
pDTraI pWM91 (20) derivative for allele exchange of traI This study
pBAD-TOPO Arabinose-inducible expression vector Invitrogen
pSetCD pBAD-TOPO containing setCD This study
pSetC pBAD-TOPO containing setC This study
pSetD pBAD-TOPO containing setD This study

Molecular biology procedures.

Plasmid DNA was prepared by using the Qiaprep Spin miniprep kit and Qiaprep miniprep kit (Qiagen). Recombinant DNA manipulations were carried out by standard procedures (2). The TA cloning kit and pBAD TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen) were used for the cloning of PCR products.

DNA sequencing and analysis.

A previously constructed cosmid library of partially _Sau_3AI-digested DNA from the SXT+ V. cholerae O139 strain MO10 (32) was screened to identify overlapping cosmids whose inserts, in aggregate, spanned the entire SXT sequence. Initially, cosmids mediating resistance to sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim were isolated on selective media, leading to the identification of a cosmid spanning the left SXT-chromosome junction (15, 32). Subsequent rounds of colony hybridization with probes derived from the sequences of the inserts of the initial cosmids were used to find cosmids spanning the remainder of the element. A combination of vector-derived primers and plasmid walking was used to obtain the SXT DNA sequence. AssemblyLIGN (Oxford Molecular Group, Campbell, Calif.) and ContigExpress (InforMax, North Bethesda, Md.) were used to assemble DNA sequences. Automated DNA sequencing was carried out at the Tufts Medical School DNA Sequencing Core Facility as described previously (32). Open reading frames (ORFs) were determined using Vector NTI (InforMax) and GeneMark (http://opal.biology.gatech.edu/GeneMark/). Protein sequences were analyzed for motifs with the SMART program (http://smart.empl-heidelberg.de). The BLAST programs (1) were used to assess similarity between SXT sequences and the GenBank database.

Bacterial conjugations.

Conjugation experiments were conducted as previously described (32). Briefly, overnight cultures of differentially marked donor and recipient cells were mixed on an LB plate and incubated at 37°C for 5 h. The cells were resuspended in LB broth, and dilutions were plated on selective media, allowing enumeration of donors, recipients, and transconjugants. The SXT transfer frequency was calculated as the number of transconjugants observed per donor cell. Mating assays for CloDF13 transfer were performed as described above, but the donor cells contained CloDF13. The CloDF13 transfer frequency was calculated as the number of CloDF13 transconjugants observed per donor cell.

PCR assay for detection of the circular extrachromosomal form of SXT.

PCR primers oriented towards the left and right SXT-chromosome junctions were used for the detection of a circularized, extrachromosomal form of the element as described previously (15). The template for the PCR assay was 1 μl of overnight cell cultures.

R391 complementation of SXT mutations.

R391 was introduced into the deletion strain via conjugation as described previously (11). This resulted in the formation of tandem arrays of R391 and SXT. Transconjugants containing R391 and SXT were then tested for the capability to mobilize SXT independently of R391 in the mating assay described above. R391 complementation was carried out only for strains that were unable to mobilize SXT.

Construction of chromosomal deletions and lacZ fusions.

Deletions were introduced into a chromosomally integrated SXT by use of the one-step chromosomal gene inactivation technique (7). In this technique, the λ Red recombinase is utilized to facilitate the recombination of linear PCR products into the Escherichia coli chromosome. These PCR products, introduced into the cell by transformation, contain an antibiotic resistance gene with 36-bp tails identical to the sequences flanking the region targeted for deletion. There are FRT (FLP recognition target) recombination sites on either side of the antibiotic resistance gene, allowing for the elimination of the marker, resulting in an unmarked, nonpolar deletion (7). Chromosomal lacZ gene replacements were created by the use of a novel template, pJB20, for the creation of the PCR products. This template contains a promoterless lacZ gene introduced into the unique _Bst_BI site downstream of the cat gene in pKD3. These PCR products were introduced into the chromosomally integrated SXT as described above (7), generating a substitution of lacZ and cat in place of the gene of interest.

β-Galactosidase assays.

Overnight cultures of cells containing a plasmid with setDC under the control of an arabinose-inducible promoter (10) (pSetDC) were diluted 1:100 in LB broth containing 100 μg of ampicillin/ml and grown for 2.5 h. Arabinose was then added to half of the culture to a final concentration of 1 mM, and the cells were grown for an additional 1.5 h. β-Galactosidase activity, reported in Miller units, was measured as described by Miller (21). The values presented are the means of at least three independent experiments.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The SXT sequence has been deposited in GenBank with accession no. AY055428.

RESULTS

General properties of the SXT sequence.

SXT is 99,483 bp in length and contains 87 putative ORFs (Fig. 1 and Table 2). The SXT sequence appears to be a composite of genes derived from plasmids, bacteriophages, and additional diverse and, in many cases, unknown sources (Table 2). While the overall G+C content of SXT (47.1%) is similar to that of the V. cholerae genome (47.6%), there are several SXT regions whose G+C contents differ significantly from the rest of the element, again suggesting that genes from numerous sources have become linked within SXT. For example, an insertion within the transfer region (see below) has a G+C content of 42.0% and contains sequences similar to that of DNA from the Ti plasmid from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (s052 and s053). SXT's antibiotic resistance genes, which appear to be embedded in a composite transposon-like structure (13) with a G+C content of 51.9%, were also probably acquired via horizontal gene transfer.

FIG.1.

FIG.1.

Genetic organization and ORF map of SXT. Putative ORFs are depicted by arrows showing the orientations. Colors are used to indicate similarity or function as follows: transposase (yellow), antibiotic resistance (blue), conjugative transfer (red), and regulation (purple). A hatched box indicates the position of the origin of transfer. ORFs of known or unknown function whose best hits by BLAST are found in phage genomes are colored green. The colored lines beneath the map indicate the locations of deletions discussed in Table 3: gray indicates the deletion had a wild-type phenotype, purple indicates mobilization of CloDF13 but no transfer of SXT, red indicates no or greatly reduced transfer of SXT or CloDF13, and green indicates no transfer of SXT or CloDF13 and no excision.

TABLE 2.

Putative ORFs in the SXT sequence

ORF no. (gene name) Coding region Probable function Identity (%/range)a Homologyb GI accession no. Required for SXT transferc
Gene name Source
001 (int) 836-2074 Integrase 97/413 int R391 (P. rettgeri) 12746566 Y
002 2079-2345 Unknown 93/79 orf2 R391 (P. rettgeri) 12746565 N
003 2351-3322 Unknown 99/324 orf1 R391 (P. rettgeri) 12746564 N
004 (_rumB_′) 4244-5413 UV repair DNA polymerase 92/372 rumB R391 (P. rettgeri) (truncated) 862633 N
005 (tnp) 5697-6287 Transposase 41/178 tnp pPHGI (Pseudomonas putida) (truncated) 4754812 N
006 (tnpA) 6404-9301 Transposase 29/961 tnpA pPHGI (P. putida) 7465523 N
007 (tnpB) 9799-11289 Transposase 99/496 orfA E. coli 10312101 N
008 (dfR18) 11656-12207 Dihydrofolate reductase type VIII 59/157 dhfRVIII pLM0226 (E. coli) 507215 N
009 12224-12766 Unknown 45/217 mlr6191 Mesorhizobium loti (truncated) 14025924 N
010 12769-13932 Unknown N
011 (dcd) 13950-14675 Deoxycytidine triphosphate deaminase 44/208 dcd Pseudomonas aeruginosa 9949625 N
012 (′tnpB) 14935-15264 Transposase 100/110 orfA E. coli (truncated) 10312102 N
013 15298-16179 Unknown N
014 (floR) 16399-17610 Florfenicol exporter 99/404 floR E. coli 10312100 N
015 17641-17943 Transcriptional repressor 70/100 orf1 S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 (truncated) 12719030 N
016 (_tnpB_′) 18058-18594 Transposase 100/135 orfA E. coli (truncated) 10312101 N
017 (strB) 18572-19405 Streptomycin phosphotransferase 100/278 strB Tn_5393_ (Erwinia amylovora) 420965 N
018 (strA) 19408-20022 Streptomycin phosphotransferase 99/267 strA Tn_5393_ (E. amylovora) 420964 N
019 (sulII) 20272-21084 Dihydropteroate synthase type II 100/271 sulII RSF1010 (E. coli) 118596 N
020 (_tnpA_′) 21555-22914 Transposase 24/413 tnpA pPHG1 (P. putida) (truncated) 7465523 N
021 22639-23358 Methyl-directed mismatch DNA repair 51/173 mutL V. cholerae (truncated) 127554 N
022 (′rumB) 23514-23831 DNA polymerase UV repair 98/78 rumB R391 (P. rettgeri) (truncated) 862633 N
023 (rumA) 23791-24162 UV repair 98/149 rumA R391 (P. rettgeri) 862632 N
024 24876-25781 Polymerase epsilon subunit 90/250 R391 (P. rettgeri) 13992587 N
025 25858-26169 Unknown N
026 26241-27164 Unknown 36/261 nmaI157 Neisseria meningitides (group A strain Z2491) 11281285 N
027 27395-27775 Unknown N
028 27766-28356 Unknown N
029 28378-30270 Unknown N
030 30325-31920 Unknown N
031 32037-32570 DNA recombination 35/64 orf1 pNSF-1 (Shigella flexneri) 12034665 N
032 32488-33237 Unknown 25/182 ss01994 Sulfolobus solfataricus (truncated) 13815272 N
033 33237-33992 Unknown N
034 34209-34676 Unknown N
035 34672-35868 Unknown N
036 35852-36229 Unknown N
037 36399-37010 Unknown N
038 37601-40231 Unknown N
039 40251-42323 Lon protease 28/165 lon Thermus thermophilus (truncated) 9719397 N
040 42331-45018 Unknown 25/912 orf74 pB171 (E. coli) 10955424 N
041 (traI) 45176-47323 Relaxase 26/314 xf1753 Xylella fastidiosa 11361836 Y
042 (traD) 47396-49192 Coupling factor 29/536 traG R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957308 Y
043 49753-50385 Coupling factor 29/96 r0117 R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957306 Y
044 50417-50692 Unknown 37/82 gp48 Bacteriophage N15 9630515 N
045 50692-51012 Unknown 40/102 gp49 Bacteriophage N15 9630516 N
046 (traL) 51187-51471 Sex pilus assembly 23/72 traL pNL1 (S. aromaticivorans) 10956948 Y*
047 (traE) 51471-52094 Sex pilus assembly 26/171 trhE R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957221 Y*
048 52078-52974 Unknown 25/254 r0031 R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957220 Y*
049 (traB) 52980-54266 Sex pilus assembly 40/209 trhB R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957218 Y*
050 (traV) 54266-54913 Sex pilus assembly 23/126 trhV R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957215 Y*
051 (traA) 54913-55296 Pilin subunit 24/85 trhA R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957223 Y
052 (ynd) 55664-56308 Unknown 46/296 ynd pTi (A. tumefaciens) 10955130 N
053 (ync) 56292-57239 Unknown 36/108 ync pTi (A. tumefaciens) 10955129 N
054 (dsbC) 57374-58063 Thiol-disulfide interchange 27/192 dsbC P. aeruginosa PAO1 9949905 Y*
055 (traC) 58066-60462 Sex pilus assembly 27/869 trhC R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957214 Y*
056 (trsF) 60789-61298 Conjugation signal peptidase 28/127 trhF R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957198 Y*
057 (traW) 61312-62433 Sex pilus assembly 28/303 trhW R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957197 Y*
058 (traU) 62420-63445 Sex pilus assembly 36/316 trhU R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957196 Y*
059 (traN) 63683-67144 Mating pair stabilization 25/481 trhN R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957195 Y*
060 67927-69006 Unknown N
061 69009-70070 Unknown N
062 70186-70899 Nuclease 53/205 nucM Pectobacterium chrysanthemi 403002 N
063 71011-71610 Unknown N
064 (ssb) 72318-72734 SSB 38/135 ssb Plasmid F (E. coli) 8918883 N
065 (bet) 72817-73632 DNA recombination 55/195 bet Bacteriophage 933W 9632480 N
066 (gp47) 73921-74934 Unknown 25/255 gp47 Bacteriophage A118 5823649 N
067 (cobS) 75030-76103 Porphyrin biosynthesis 31/288 cobS pMT1 (Yersinia pestis) 3883103 N
068 76975-77925 Unknown 20/205 r0207 R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957394 N
069 77990-78427 Unknown N
070 78500-80152 Unknown 20/265 r0206 R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957393 N
071 (radC) 80237-80731 DNA repair 56/151 radC V. cholerae 11355878 N
072 81243-82241 Unknown 36/232 r0204 R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957391 N
073 82335-83039 Unknown N
074 83307-84233 Response regulator 39/289 rrp-1 Borrelia burgdorferi 2688314 N
075 84242-88045 Histidine kinase 37/1233 pa4112 P. aeruginosa PAO1 11351830 N
076 (traF) 88747-89721 Sex pilus assembly 27/278 r0126 R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957315 ND
077 (traH) 89727-91112 Sex pilus assembly 39/451 trhH R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10957316 ND
078 (traG) 91119-94685 Sex pilus assembly 21/828 traG R27 (S. enterica serovar Typhi) 10956931 Y
079 94724-95173 Unknown N
080 (setC) 95210-95740 Transcriptional activator 31/172 s006 DT104 (S. enterica serovar Typhimurium) 12719014 Y
081 (setD) 95740-96036 Flagellar transcriptional activator 28/97 flhD Serratia liquefaciens 2126176 Y
082 96036-96581 Unknown 29/130 mlr2934 M. loti 13472590 N
083 96571-96936 Unknown N
084 96929-97231 Unknown N
085 97221-97739 Unknown N
085 (ydaS) 98147-98395 Unknown 42/59 ydaS Prophage CP-933N (E. coli) 12514682 UNK
086 (setR) 98513-99157 Transcriptional repressor 46/213 cl Phage 434 420538 UNK

SXT is organized in a modular fashion, with clusters of genes with related functions. The antibiotic resistance genes (Fig. 1, depicted in blue) are found near the 5′ end of the integrated form of SXT. The transfer-related genes are clustered in four groups in the 3′ half of SXT (Fig. 1, depicted in red). Proteins required for SXT integration-excision and regulation are encoded at the right and left ends of the element, respectively. As expected from our previous studies, SXT does not contain ORFs similar to genes known to be required for either plasmid replication or partitioning, since SXT is not thought to have an autonomously replicating extrachromosomal form (32). In addition, SXT contains 26 genes with putative products that do not have significant similarity to sequences in the GenBank database and 15 genes whose products are similar to those of genes of undetermined function. Many of these hypothetical genes are also found within clusters (Table 2 and Fig. 1).

Experimental approach.

To further analyze the roles of individual genes or groups of genes in the transfer, excision, and regulation of SXT, deletions were constructed using E. coli K-12 as the SXT host. Previously, we observed a higher SXT transfer frequency with E. coli donors than with V. cholerae (32), thus facilitating the analysis. Additionally, we were able to construct many in-frame deletions in SXT in E. coli with the recently published one-step chromosomal gene inactivation technique, which utilizes the lambda Red recombinase to integrate linear PCR products into the E. coli chromosome (7, 34). Using this technique, we constructed a set of strains containing deletions of nearly every SXT ORF. The resulting mutants were then tested for the ability to mediate SXT excision and self-transfer and the ability to mobilize the plasmid CloDF13. CloDF13 is not self-transmissible and requires the presence of a conjugative element to be transferred into recipient cells (5). We tested SXT deletion mutants defective in conjugation for the ability to be complemented by the presence of R391, since our preliminary data indicated that R391 encodes a conjugative system nearly identical to that of SXT (11).

Integrase region.

The first ORF found at the 5′ end of the integrated SXT, int, codes for an integrase related to those found in lambdoid bacteriophages. Our previous studies revealed that int is required for both the element's integration into and excision from the chromosome (15). In SXT and the related element R391, int lies at the 3′ end of a putative operon with two other genes, s002 and s003. Deletion of s002 (15) and s003 (Table 2) had no effect on SXT transfer or excision. Sequence analysis and deletion studies did not identify any additional _xis_-like genes involved in SXT excision.

Antibiotic resistance region.

The antibiotic resistance genes coding for sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, streptomycin, and chloramphenicol resistance are clustered together near the 5′ end of the element (Fig. 1) and were the subject of a recent paper (13). We reported that genes that are likely to encode transposases flank the antibiotic resistance genes; the entire 23-kb sequence from tnp to _tnpA_′ has a structure similar to that of a composite transposon integrated into SXT in rumB (13). Deletion of the entire region, including the truncated _rumB_′ and rumA (Fig. 1, Δ1), did not alter the frequency of SXT transfer or excision (Table 3); thus, the putative transposases have no discernible role in SXT transfer. Consistent with this idea, in the closely related element R391, rumB is not interrupted by this composite transposon-like structure (13).

TABLE 3.

Phenotypic analysis of SXT deletions

Deletiona Region deleted SXT transfer (10−4)b CloDF13 transfer (10−4)c Circle formationd R391 complementatione
WT 1.0 3.2 + NA
Δ1 rumB-rumA 8.0 4.6 + NA
Δ2 s024-s040 1.7 1.0 + NA
Δ3 tral UD 0.1 + +
Δ4 traD-s043 UD 5.6 +
Δ5 traD UD 13 + +
Δ6 s043 UD 22 + +
Δ7 s044-s045 0.6 10 + NA
Δ8 traL-traA UD UD + +
Δ9 s052-traN UD UD + +
Δ10 s060-s073 0.0064 UD + NA
Δ11 s074 0.52 0.75 + NA
Δ12 traG UD UD + +
Δ13 s079-s084 UD UD +
Δ14 setD UD UD +f
Δ15 setC UD UD +f

Transfer region.

Analysis of the SXT DNA sequence revealed that the SXT conjugative transfer system is most similar in its sequence and organization to R27, a conjugative plasmid derived from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (29), and is also related to the transfer system of the F plasmid. The conjugation-related genes carried by plasmids derived from gram-negative organisms, such as F, share two basic features: (i) they specify the production of a conjugative apparatus that includes a pilus and enables the formation of mating pairs, and (ii) they encode proteins required for the DNA processing steps that enable DNA transport from the donor to the recipient. SXT contains genes (Fig. 1) that, at least by homology, are likely to be important in both of these processes.

SXT's tra gene homologs are clustered together in the 3′ half of the SXT sequence in at least three putative operons. The first operon (traI to s043) encodes functions for DNA processing, while the other two operons (traL to traN and traF to traG) are likely to be involved in pilus assembly and mating pair formation. The first putative pilus assembly operon is interrupted by three genes (s052, s053, and s054) not found in the F plasmid. s052 and s053 have similarity to ORFs of unknown function in the A. tumefaciens Ti plasmid_._ The s054 gene product has similarity to DsbC, a disulfide bond isomerase. Interestingly, orthologs of DsbC are also present in the transfer gene regions of plasmids with conjugation systems most closely related to SXT (26, 29; J. P. Dillard, personal communication; T. Murata, T. Hayashi, M. Ohnishi, K. Nakayama, Y. Terawaki, K. Takashima, T. Ara, H. Mori, J. Kaneko, Y. Kamio, T. Miki, C. G. Han, and E. Ohtsubo, Abstr. 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. H-66, 2001).

As expected, the SXT genes homologous to those found in the F plasmid or other conjugative plasmids are required for its conjugative transfer. Deletions of transfer region genes (Fig. 1, Δ3 to Δ6, Δ8, Δ9, and Δ12) all rendered SXT immobile. However, only a subset of these mutations impaired transfer of the mobilizable plasmid CloDF13 (see below). These deletions had no discernible influence on SXT excision, as we could detect the extrachromosomal circular form of SXT in each of these strains. Introduction of R391 into these strains complemented the transfer defects in all cases except the Δ4 deletion (see below) (Table 3).

As mentioned above, only a subset of the mutations impaired the mobilization of the plasmid CloDF13. Mutations in genes of both putative pilus assembly operons (i.e., Δ8, Δ9, and Δ12) prevented CloDF13 mobilization; however, mutations in individual genes of the putative DNA-processing operon did not prevent CloDF13 transfer (Table 3, Δ3, Δ5, Δ6). Sequence comparison suggests that this operon encodes a TraG family member (designated TraD according to F nomenclature) and a TraI homolog (designated TraI), as well as one protein with no apparent similarity (the product of orf43). TraG family members are “coupling” proteins that link cytoplasmically localized DNA-processing functions and membrane-localized mating pair formation functions during conjugative gene transfer (5). TraI proteins are DNA relaxases that are critical for the initiation of conjugative DNA transfer, catalyzing the strand-specific DNA cleavage at the origin of transfer (oriT) (16). Whereas most mobilizable plasmids require the coupling protein of a conjugative system, CloDF13 encodes both a coupling protein and a DNA relaxase specific to its oriT (5); thus, it is not surprising that CloDF13 mobilization could occur even in the absence of the SXT-encoded proteins. It seems likely that orf43 also encodes a protein for which CloDF13 can supply a substitute, since, like mutants lacking traI and traD, an orf43 mutant could mobilize CloDF13 but not SXT (Table 3).

Identification of the origin of transfer.

Surprisingly, the transfer deficiency of the Δ4 mutation (which removed the region from traD to s043) could not be complemented by R391, even though the deletions of the individual genes within this region (Δ5 and Δ6) could be complemented. This suggested that the Δ4 mutation includes a _cis_-acting site essential for transfer, such as the SXT-specific oriT. Therefore, we tested whether the 550-bp intergenic region between traD and s043 contained the SXT oriT. This region was introduced into a plasmid (pCR2.1) that is ordinarily not mobilizable. Unlike pCR2.1, the resulting plasmid, pOriT, was mobilizable if SXT was present in the donor cell (Table 4); in addition, mobilization of pOriT did not require that SXT itself be transferred into the recipient cell. The sequence of this 550-bp region contains several features, including direct and indirect repeats and an area with high A+T content, that are commonly found in the origins of transfer in conjugative elements (16). These observations are consistent with the idea that the SXT oriT is located within the intergenic region between traD and s043.

TABLE 4.

Isolation of an SXT oriT

Donor straina Transfer frequency (10−5)b
Plasmid SXT
pCR2.1 <0.029
pCR2.1 + <0.024
pOriT <0.046
pOriT + 8.2

Regions containing novel genes.

There are two large SXT regions that primarily contain genes with no known function. The first of these regions, located between the antibiotic cluster and the first transfer region, consists of 17 putative ORFs (s024 to s040), 14 of which have no significant homology to proteins in the GenBank database. Remarkably, deletion of the entire region from s024 to s040 had no effect on SXT transfer or excision (Table 3, Δ2). The second of these regions is 21 kb in length and contains 16 putative ORFs (s060 to s073) likely to comprise at least three different operons based on their orientations. This region, which separates the second and third transfer regions, contains several ORFs with similarity to proteins in the GenBank database. One of these is a putative single-stranded-DNA binding protein (SSB), a common element in several conjugation systems (9). Downstream of the SSB are two ORFs (s065 and s066) that are similar to phage proteins: the recombination protein Bet of phage 933W and a gene product of unknown function. s074 and s075 encode a putative two-component system, but a role for these genes in the regulation of SXT transfer seems unlikely, as deletion of the response regulator (Table 3, Δ11) did not have any effect on SXT transfer or excision. In contrast, deletion of the region from s060 to s073 (Table 3, Δ10) resulted in a 1,000-fold reduction in the frequency of SXT transfer, although excision of SXT was not abolished. Transfer of CloDF13 was reduced to below detectable levels in this mutant (Table 3). These observations indicate that some of the gene products within this region augment but are not essential for SXT transfer. No single-gene deletion in this region has been found that has an effect comparable to the _s060_-to-s073 deletion (data not shown).

Regulatory region.

The 3′ end of SXT was found to play a critical role in regulation of SXT transfer. This region contains nine ORFs, eight oriented in one direction (s079 to s086) and a final divergently oriented gene (setR). Only three of the gene products in this region have significant similarity to proteins of known function in the database. SetC and SetD are similar to FlhC and FlhD, the master activators of flagellar transcription (17), and SetR is homologous to CI434 and other related lambdoid phage repressors. Deletion of the region from s079 to s085 (Δ13) reduced both SXT and CloDF13 transfer to below detectable limits. Additionally, unlike all previously mentioned mutations except the int deletion, this mutation resulted in the absence of a detectable excised circular form of the element (Table 3). The deficiency in SXT excision and transfer in the Δ13 mutant strain could be attributed to the activities of two of the eight deleted genes, designated setC and setD. Single deletions of either setC or setD abolished SXT excision and transfer, and these properties could be restored to the mutants by complementation with the individual genes on a plasmid (Table 3). The findings that SetC and SetD were indispensable for both SXT chromosomal excision and formation of the conjugative apparatus, two critical and distinct processes required for SXT mobility, suggested that these gene products may function as regulators.

Since SetC and SetD exhibited similarity to FlhC and FlhD, known transcription activators, we tested whether expression of an arabinose-inducible setDC could activate expression of chromosomal lacZ transcriptional fusions to genes important for SXT excision and transfer, such as the previously described int and tra genes. These lacZ fusions were created by modification of the template used to generate the PCR products for the one-step chromosomal gene inactivation (see Materials and Methods). These fragments were introduced into the chromosomally integrated SXT, generating a substitution of lacZ and cat (encoding resistance to chloramphenicol) in place of the gene of interest.

Experiments with these reporter strains demonstrated that SetC and SetD serve as transcriptional activators of genes important for SXT excision and transfer. An arabinose-induc ible setDC was introduced into strains containing lacZ fusions in place of s003, which likely represents the first gene in the _int_-containing operon, and in place of traL-traA and traG (Table 5), which are in two different putative pilus assembly operons. In the absence of arabinose, the β-galactosidase activities of these three fusions were low (≤10 Miller units [Table 5]). Induction of setDC expression from the plasmid resulted in a minimum 34-fold activation of lacZ expression in these fusions. SetC and SetD also appear to regulate their own expression, since expression of setDC resulted in a 40-fold activation of a lacZ fusion in place of setD (Table 5). In contrast, a lacZ fusion in place of floR, a gene that confers resistance to chloramphenicol and whose activity is not important for SXT transfer or excision, was not regulated by setDC expression. These results indicate that, in either a direct or indirect fashion, SetC and SetD activate the expression of genes required for SXT excision and transfer, and they suggest that the stimulatory effect of SetC and SetD is specific to SXT genes induced during SXT mobilization.

TABLE 5.

SetD and SetC stimulate SXT transfer gene expression

Site of fusiona β-Galactosidase activityb
+
Δ(traL-traA)::lacZ 1.3 53
Δ_s003_::lacZ 6.5 320
Δ_traG_::lacZ 10 340
Δ_setDC_::lacZ 8.4 340
Δ_floR_::lacZ 46 38

As mentioned above, SetR, the last ORF of SXT, has homology to CI434 and other lambdoid repressors. Interestingly, deletion of setR from SXT could be accomplished only in a strain complemented in trans with a plasmid expressing setR. We did not observe loss of the complementing plasmid in the deletion strain. In contrast, this plasmid was unstable in isogenic cells either lacking SXT or containing a wild-type (setR+) SXT (data not shown). These observations suggest that removal of SetR, presumably a CI-like repressor, is deleterious to cell growth in the presence of SXT.

DISCUSSION

The chimeric nature of SXT is evident from analyses of its DNA sequence and functional properties. SXT contains genes related to the F plasmid genes that encode the DNA-processing, pilus assembly, and mating pair formation functions of conjugative DNA transfer. This is not the case for Tn_916_ (8) and CTnDOT, two well-characterized CTns whose conjugative transfer genes are unrelated to those found on plasmids. However, SXT is not simply a plasmid that integrates; in contrast to plasmids, its genome did not contain genes required for either autonomous replication or segregation. SXT chromosomal integration and excision and the recombination events underlying these processes closely resemble lambda phage integration and excision (15). Regulation of SXT transfer may also be similar to control of lambda lysogeny. This hypothesis is suggested by our observation that setR, the lambda CI-like repressor found in the SXT genome, could not be deleted in the presence of SXT. setC and setD, SXT-encoded transcription factors with similarity to the chromosomal regulators of flagellar gene transcription FlhC and FlhD, also play central roles in control of SXT transfer.

The mosaic nature of SXT is underscored by the observation that its antibiotic resistance genes and the putative transposases that surround them were apparently a late addition to the element. The composite transposon-like structure in which the SXT antibiotic resistances are found has a different G+C content than the remainder of the element, and deletion of the entire region did not influence SXT mobility. Also, CTns closely related to SXT, such as R391 and the SXT-like elements found in contemporary Asian V. cholerae El Tor O1 clinical isolates, contain different antibiotic resistance genes found in different locations in the SXT “backbone” (13).

The SXT-encoded gene products essential for pilus assembly and DNA processing are similar to and maintain genetic organization with several recently published putative conjugation systems found in several other gram-negative bacteria, including the conjugative plasmids R27 from S. enterica serovar Typhi (29), pNL1 from Sphingomonas aromaticivorans (26), and Rts1 from E. coli (Murata et al., Abstr. 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.), and the gonococcal genetic island from the chromosome of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Dillard, personal communication). Many of the genes flanking the antibiotic resistance genes in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 (4) have significant similarity to those encoded in the SXT conjugation system; however, mobilization of the DT104 element has not been detected. Interestingly, all of these conjugation systems (with the exception of the DT104 island) also contain a _dsbC_-like allele within a putative pilus assembly operon, though its role in conjugative transfer has not been demonstrated. In addition, Rts1 (Murata et al., Abstr. 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.) and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 (4) contain a homolog of SetC but lack setD. R27, pNL1 and the gonococcal genetic island do not contain homologs of these genes.

SetC and SetD are the first examples of FlhC- and FlhD-related proteins that are involved in the regulation of conjugative transfer. FlhC and FlhD were initially described as regulators of flagellar gene transcription in E. coli (17), but more recent studies have revealed that these genes are involved in regulating diverse processes, including cell division (FlhD only), cell shape (24), virulence factor production (18), and anaerobic respiration (23). In E. coli, the products of the flhD master operon, FlhD and FlhC, form a D2C2 heterotetrameric complex that binds to class II promoters of the flagellar regulon and activates transcription (19). Our work suggests that SetC and SetD may function in a similar fashion. Both setC and setD are required for SXT conjugative transfer. Further studies are required to determine if SetC and SetD oligomerize and directly activate transcription, as is the case with FlhC and FlhD. FlhD and FlhC sit at the top of the regulatory hierarchy governing expression of the flagellar operons. It is not possible to discern from our present study whether there is a similar hierarchy regulating expression of the genes encoding the SXT conjugation system. Given the relatively weak similarity of SetC and SetD to FlhC and FlhD, it seems unlikely that these SXT-encoded regulators interact with the chromosome-encoded regulators, though this possibility remains to be examined.

Since SetD and SetC activate SXT transfer, exploring the factors regulating their production will provide insight into how SXT transfer (and thereby antibiotic resistance gene transfer) is regulated. We hypothesize that SetR, the SXT gene product with similarity to the λ CI repressor, may be involved in the regulation of setDC expression. Two observations support this idea. First, setR could be deleted only when SetR was provided in trans, suggesting that SetR represses expression of SXT-encoded genes whose overproduction is toxic. Second, overexpression of setDC was toxic in SXT-containing cells. Ongoing work is focused on the role of SetR in the regulation of conjugative transfer of SXT.

Our study illustrates the considerable value of the one-step chromosomal gene inactivation technique to carry out “functional genomics.” Using this technique, we deleted large portions of a 100-kb chromosomal element in a simple and rapid fashion. Phenotypic examination of these large deletions facilitated the identification of regions of interest for creation of in-frame deletions of single ORFs. Introduction of the promoterless lacZ allele into the vector used to generate the gene replacement product allowed the examination of regulatory circuits without disrupting the native regulatory elements. Similar vectors could be constructed for the introduction of other sequences on the chromosome to create additional transcriptional reporters, as well as fusion proteins (e.g., green fluorescent protein fusions or epitope tags). Thus, with minor modifications, the one-step chromosomal gene inactivation technique allows studies of gene expression and protein production and localization without relying on plasmid constructs.

Acknowledgments

We thank B. Davis, A. Camilli, A. Kane, and P. Wagner for critically reading the manuscript. We thank K. Datsenko and B. Wanner for strains and advice with the one-step chromosomal gene inactivation technique.

This work was supported in part by funds from NIH Training Grant AI07422 (J.W.B.), the DFG (B.H.), NIH Grant AI42347, the Pew Foundation, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (M.K.W.), and a pilot project grant from the NEMC GRASP Center (P30DK-34928).

REFERENCES